April 28, 2022, 12:07 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 20, 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 10,446
|
S&W Hammer push off?
I have a bit of a conundrum with my S&W 629-6 as I recently had to replace the hammer in order to correct a case of hammer push off. I noticed that the SA trigger on my revolver had become extremely light and, while I've seen worse cases, when tested the gun did have a case of hammer push off. Now, we all know that the most common cause for hammer push off is amateur gunsmithing but I know that such was not the case with my revolver as I bought this gun brand new roughly 15 years ago and have never modified the internals other than to swap out the mainspring and rebound slide spring (the factory springs have since been re-installed). In examining my old hammer, the SA notch did appear to be worn as compared to the new one (though the notch is so small it's difficult to tell) and I also noticed what appeared to be a small chip on the SA "leg" of the hammer.
Replacing the hammer with a new one seems to have cured the problem as I can no longer produce hammer push off with reasonable pressure and the SA trigger is back to what I'd consider normal. Does anyone have any idea what might have caused the abnormal wear to the original hammer? I have a couple of hypotheses, but I'm not sure how likely they are. One possibility is that several years ago I did have the firing pin break (it was repaired by S&W) and perhaps part of the firing pin swimming around in the action chipped the SA "leg" of the hammer which, with several years more wear, caused the problem (though I'd think S&W would notice the damage to the hammer when the gun was sent in for initial repair). The other possible cause is that I polished the exterior of the gun (though I did not remove the sideplate or internals when I did so) and perhaps a bit of polish found its way into the action and gradually wore the SA notch of the hammer (though the trigger exhibits no abnormal wear that I can detect). |
April 28, 2022, 01:47 PM | #2 |
Staff
Join Date: November 2, 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 21,833
|
Hammer sear gets worn. If it's mim, then once the hardened surface is gone, it wears out rather quickly.
__________________
Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt. Molon Labe! |
April 28, 2022, 06:48 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 28, 2006
Location: South Central Michigan...near
Posts: 6,501
|
If I remember correctly, it has nothing to do with MIM. The hammers and triggers, etc. were case hardened way before there were MIM parts and once the case is worn through, softer steel underneath wears more rapidly as you stated.
|
April 29, 2022, 11:55 AM | #4 | |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,832
|
Quote:
No idea if that true, or not, just that's there's a lot of talk...
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
|
April 29, 2022, 03:03 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2013
Posts: 3,824
|
Do you shoot a lot of SA? If you do, the sear engagement will get worn to negative to cause push-off.
It can be repaired, but it is a professional job. Replacing parts is easier. Applying good grease to the engagement surfaces will help lengthening the life of the proper engagement. -TL Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk |
April 29, 2022, 04:11 PM | #6 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,466
|
Quote:
But I think you were implying that the hammer and trigger are case hardened. I doubt that S&W was using case hardening 15 years ago. I think those parts would have been heat treated, which would generate a much more homogeneous through hardening.
__________________
NRA Life Member / Certified Instructor NRA Chief RSO / CMP RSO 1911 Certified Armorer Jeepaholic |
|
April 29, 2022, 06:49 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,248
|
The problem with hammer push-off usually has nothing to do with the hammer. It's usually the trigger. Recutting the trigger usually solves the problem.
You either know or you don't know. The trick is knowing what box you fit in.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs. But what do I know? Summit Arms Services |
May 11, 2022, 08:53 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 28, 2006
Location: South Central Michigan...near
Posts: 6,501
|
Quote:
As for how long or when S&W used case hardening on hammers and triggers, I do not know other than the conventional wisdom in the gun rags has been that they were in fact case hardened way back in the sixties when I was reading most of the gun rags in those days. There was always a sage warning not to "take too much off when polishing the contact surfaces or one would remove the case hardening and initiate fast wear." Furthermore, seems that years ago the hammers were showing case hardening colors. However, I am old and may not be remembering correctly. |
|
May 11, 2022, 11:50 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 7, 2006
Posts: 10,984
|
dahermit is correct.
Case hardening is used to give a hard surface to an otherwise ductile steel/iron part. If hammers were hardened all the way through, they would break often from impact. I have a brand new (3-4 years old) model 37. The hammer and trigger are case hardened. I have an M&P from the 1940s and the hammer and trigger are color case hardened-as is the trigger on my 3rd model; Safety Hammerless from the 1940s. |
May 15, 2022, 09:32 AM | #10 |
Staff
Join Date: November 2, 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 21,833
|
Earlier S&W hammers were case hardened. We were warned (back in '84) not to stone the surface too much lest we go past the case hardening.
As to the pushoff, that's generally because the single action notch on the hammer failing to hold. Worn SA notch on hammer will cause this. Open her up and take a look-see.
__________________
Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt. Molon Labe! |
|
|