|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 10, 2016, 10:43 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 9, 2016
Posts: 270
|
My original Winchester 1873
I've got an original 73 carbine from 1887 in 44-40, in original condition, with all their original parts and fully functional though his external condition isn't the best one. I cannot blame on it because obviously it is a legend by itself.
Attached you can see it sided by a Colt bowie and a Pietta Bison. The rifle is not much accurate, although their rifling is in very good condition, so I suppose their issue is that today bullets are of a smaller caliber than the gun. 44-40 ammo I found is .427 and the rifle is almost .432. Do you know any place where I could buy a set of molds for .432 or .434 caliber? Is my problem the only one or a common one? |
May 10, 2016, 01:50 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 6, 2009
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 2,832
|
No idea about molds, but Midway has some rather affordable 431 bullets
__________________
I used to love being able to hit hard at 1000 yards. As I get older I find hitting a mini ram at 200 yards with the 22 oddly more satisfying. |
May 10, 2016, 02:40 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 16, 2007
Location: Southern Arizona
Posts: 3,888
|
Nice looking rifle.
|
May 10, 2016, 02:59 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 9, 2016
Posts: 270
|
From the time when things were made to last not a lifetime but several.
|
May 10, 2016, 03:37 PM | #5 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
"...when things were made to last not a lifetime but several."
Not really, at least as far as the 1873 goes. They actually wear out pretty rapidly if fired very much, which is why it is hard to find a good, tight, '73. Mostly, the links and pins wear, along with the iron receivers themselves where the bolt rubs. The use of hot modern loads in '73 clones is not a great idea, even though the materials are better than in the original guns. They were better than the bronze '66's but not really a very good or durable rifle by today's standards and expectations. Jim |
May 10, 2016, 03:49 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 9, 2016
Posts: 270
|
Mine for sure was not very much used...since it is still very tight.
Regarding the rest of your comments I agree that contrary to popular belief these old guns were not as strong as we think they are. |
May 10, 2016, 05:20 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 16, 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,634
|
I would guess that most 44 Magnum bullet molds will drop bullets around .432 to .434.
I would have to agree that the guns from the 1860's to 1880's were quite a bit more fragile than the stuff even low end manufacturers are putting out today. The advances made in the early 1900's in design and metallurgy were huge. |
May 10, 2016, 09:01 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 27, 2008
Posts: 555
|
FWIW, Since you can only use bullets of a diameter that allow you to
chamber a loaded round, The OP might want to measure the interior diameter of a fired case to see what diameter bullet can be safely reloaded. Soft 40-1 bullets might help to bump up for bore seal if you cannot use bullets that match the bore when reloading. The above cast bullet ratio helped me with an '86 and a high wall that were both chambered in 40-82. Both rifles had .4085 bores but the chambers would only accept .406 bullets. I could have inside neck reamed the cases, but the thin case mouth and neck on a .44-40 precludes that solution. Fired with duplexed black powder of course. JT |
May 11, 2016, 01:42 AM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 30, 2009
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 7,172
|
Quote:
__________________
As always, YMMV. __________________________________________ MIIAA SIFE |
|
May 11, 2016, 08:41 PM | #10 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
As others have said, modern copies are of much better material than the originals, but true copies are still weak actions, kept locked by links that lock up just past dead center. I think if you compare the lockup of a '73 to that of a '92 or a '94, you will see that the newer guns have a big advantage in strength even beyond the use of modern steel instead of 19th century wrought iron.
I do not have one of the Miroku '73's, but AFAIK is it a true copy. Some lever actions, like the modern Henry rifles, are made to look like the old timers, but have a redesigned and much stronger action underneath the old appearance. To try and answer the specific question, I would think it is probably a good idea to stick to moderate loads in that .357, but you could contact Winchester and see what they say. Jim |
May 12, 2016, 08:11 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 7, 2008
Location: pa.
Posts: 2,450
|
if you want a 44 mag,buy one. the 44-40 was not intended to be a 44 mag. in a good safe to start 1873 rifle and a 44-40 cast 200gr bullet at 1100-1200fps will not harm the rifle. not the same rifle,but a bigger clone of the 1873, the 1876 was shot to untill it was disabled when in came out by winchester, google up the tests, it may surprise you. i shoot three 44-40 rifles useing unique powder and 200gr cast bullets and have killed several deer with broadside double lung shots at less than 100yrds with complete pass thru,s with little tracking being needed. again if you need a hopped up 44, buy a mag. eastbank.
|
May 12, 2016, 01:02 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 9, 2016
Posts: 270
|
Since it is an original old warrior, I'll never ask him to perform like a modern 44.
I'll try to get a new mold to improve its accuracy and that's all. Thks! |
May 12, 2016, 07:02 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 17, 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 366
|
The '66 & '73 from what I have read were in production up until 1919 27 years after the introduction of their logical replacement, the '92. Probably not that many were sold after the introduction of the '92 but they were still available. If the toggle link is that bad why would someone buy one when the price was not that far apart?
__________________
357 Taurus Gaucho, 22 Heritage RR, 2-Pietta 1858 44 NMA Remingtons, Pietta, Euroarms & ASM 36 1851 Navies, 31 Uberti 1849, 12 ga H&R Topper, 16 Ga Western Field, 43 Spanish Remington Rolling Block, 44 ASM Colt Walker, High Point C9 9mm, Winchester 1906 22, Rossi 62 22 rifle, Uberti 1860, H&A & IJ 32 S&W BreakTop, 36 Euroarms 1858, 32 H&R 04, 22mag NAA SS BP revolver, .44 Rodgers & Spencer, IJ 38 S&W BreakTop, IJ 22 Sealed 8 |
May 12, 2016, 07:09 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,189
|
Seems to me your best bet is getting a bullet mold/dies for heeled bullets.
|
|
|