|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 26, 2018, 10:12 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 17, 2016
Location: Montana
Posts: 184
|
Person to Person FFL Transfer
Howdy everyone, I have a question.
I am trying to sell a mossberg shockwave to a person who lives in the same state as me but hasn't obtained residency yet, though they do possess a MT driver's license. According to the interweb you have to live in Montana 12 months before becoming a resident. So I'm pretty sure I need to go through an FFL. I called the only one open this late today and they said they'd have to have the other person's FFL paperwork as well and that confused me. They won't have one since they live here. Or am I missing something? Last edited by Kwik2010; May 26, 2018 at 10:17 PM. |
May 26, 2018, 10:24 PM | #2 | |
Staff
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,990
|
Quote:
If the person is a resident of MT that satisfies the requirement regardless of how long they've been a resident. If the buyer has an MT DL and the address on the DL is an MT address where the person actually lives then I think you're good to go.
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
|
|
May 26, 2018, 11:02 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 17, 2016
Location: Montana
Posts: 184
|
Thanks for the info. It feels like a grey area and to be honest it's making me nervous. I would assume what you're saying is correct but I don't want to lose my rights nor end up in prison because I thought it was ok. I don't know what the feds consider a resident to be. If all it takes is a MT DL with a MT address then that'd be great. But I dunno how to find out.
|
May 26, 2018, 11:03 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 17, 2016
Location: Montana
Posts: 184
|
The time requirement seems to change for each thing. For tutiton it's one year. To hunt or fish it's 6 months. I can't find anything pertaining to gun ownership.
|
May 26, 2018, 11:10 PM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 19, 2012
Location: Western PA
Posts: 3,829
|
Quote:
In other words, if you're living in a state, then you're a resident of that state. There is no time requirement. See ATF Ruling 2010-6. Keep in mind that there are different state and federal definitions of residency depending on whether you're dealing with things like taxes, voting, drivers licensing, a military home of record, etc. But this is simply regarding the federal rules of residency as it specifically pertains to transferring firearms, because that's what governs the private firearm transfer rules in most states. Some states have more restrictive rules than the feds do regarding private transfers, but I doubt MT does. I also doubt they use a different definition of residency than the feds do when it comes to firearm transfers.
__________________
0331: "Accuracy by volume." Last edited by Theohazard; May 26, 2018 at 11:32 PM. |
|
May 27, 2018, 12:14 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 17, 2016
Location: Montana
Posts: 184
|
That clears up a lot thank you.
|
May 28, 2018, 06:36 AM | #7 |
Staff
Join Date: July 28, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 8,821
|
Yes, timelines & definitions may seem fairly malleable, depending on the topic one is researching. I haven't dug into this issue, but a requirement that one live in MT for 12 months before becoming a resident seems like an awfully long time. . . . particularly in light of the fact that "[a] person who has resided in Montana for more than 60 consecutive days is considered to be a resident for the purpose of being licensed to operate a motor vehicle and must be licensed under the laws of Montana before operating a motor vehicle." Mont. Code Ann. § 61-5-103 (West). So for purposes of a DL, someone who has resided there for 60 days is considered a resident.
And for federal law purposes, JohnKSa & Theohazard right. There's no specific minimum time limit. That said, were I in your shoes, I'd be more than a little uneasy. A DL is a very quick, very easy proof of residency and you already know that your buyer doesn't have that.
__________________
I'm a lawyer, but I'm not your lawyer. If you need some honest-to-goodness legal advice, go buy some. |
May 28, 2018, 08:29 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 17, 2016
Location: Montana
Posts: 184
|
I think you may have misread. He does have a MT Driver's License.
|
May 28, 2018, 09:39 AM | #9 | ||
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,468
|
Quote:
Quote:
If federal law for purposes of firearms purposes makes residency as simple as living there, and the state of Montana says 60 days is enough residency to get a drivers license and the person has a Montana drivers license ... what's the basis for saying the person hasn't obtained residency? The BATFE has established that, basically, where you sleep is where you live. Not to the point of hotel rooms, but a person who owns a vacation house in a second state is considered by the BATFE to be a resident of that second state while living in said vacation house. Yet the person would not qualify for a driver's license in the second state ... so possession of a drivers license is a less than perfect indicator, but would seem to me to be more than safe. Last edited by Aguila Blanca; May 28, 2018 at 12:18 PM. Reason: typo |
||
May 28, 2018, 11:33 AM | #10 | |
Staff
Join Date: July 28, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 8,821
|
Quote:
Sorry.
__________________
I'm a lawyer, but I'm not your lawyer. If you need some honest-to-goodness legal advice, go buy some. |
|
May 28, 2018, 12:04 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 17, 2016
Location: Montana
Posts: 184
|
Oh no need for apologies haha. Just making sure everyone was on the same page.
|
|
|