July 14, 2022, 11:39 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 10, 2014
Posts: 1,380
|
5.56 Powder Question
Up front I’ve loaded for close to 60 yrs. Loaded 223 since it came out , for bolt actions. Used BC-L2 / 55gr bullets. Now I have broke down and bought AR-15.
I want to load GI dupe for 55gr FMJs. What is the most economical powder to do this? I’ve not used many of the powders on market today. I’m running out of stash. I’m not wanting to use up my BC-L2 for AR loads. Have lots of IMR powders but not the best for 5.56 and POA to tap down in case. |
July 14, 2022, 11:42 AM | #2 |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,061
|
It's no more economical than BL-(C)2, but H335 is canister grade WC844, which is the ball powder used by the military for M193. BL-(C)2 is canister grade WC846, which was first used in 303 British during WWII and was later adopted for M80 7.62 ammunition.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle |
July 14, 2022, 11:48 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 21, 2012
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 3,973
|
I have used several powders for my AR. with 55, 62, and 75g bullets. I have tried, Benchmark, Varget, BL-c2, h335, CFE223 and TAC.
so far I have found TAC, Varget, and BL-c2 to work best with heavier bullets. Benchmark was low on the velocity size for duplicating military loads, but was very consistent. I have had good results, breaking 3000fps out of a 16in barrel with a 55g bullet with CFE223. It is a pretty sooty powder, but the soot cleans up easily. with magnum primers SD and ES were acceptable, but were not good with standard primers. I have more testing to do with H335, velocities have been low so far at Hornady max, but from my reading other manuals go higher.
__________________
I don't believe in "range fodder" that is why I reload. |
July 15, 2022, 05:18 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 28, 2013
Posts: 3,175
|
For 55gr bullets I’ve had good results with H335. For heavier bullets it’s pretty much a dead tie between H4895 and Varget.
|
July 15, 2022, 06:24 AM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 17, 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,894
|
Quote:
|
|
July 16, 2022, 01:34 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 23, 2008
Posts: 1,091
|
CFE223 and Varget are my established 52 and 55 grain loads, although I'm testing some 4895 in 62's and 68's and it looks promising.
__________________
"What most people forget is that the first country the Nazi's conquered was their own." 44AMP on thefiringline.com |
July 16, 2022, 07:58 PM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2012
Posts: 6,165
|
Quote:
|
|
July 16, 2022, 09:07 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 21, 2013
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,695
|
All the above mentioned powders are excellent for gas gun 556. The only problem is they are the most popular powders so good luck finding any.
My goto far less popular gas gun 556 powder that is possible to find currently ? Win 748.
__________________
"To be old an wise you must have been young and stupid" |
July 16, 2022, 10:01 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
|
Ball powders are seldom, if ever, used in rifle competition to win and set records.
|
July 16, 2022, 10:40 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 1999
Location: NW Wi
Posts: 1,671
|
Quote:
It has performed better (accuracy) in 5.56 with mag primers, including rem 7 1/2's, in my experience. |
|
July 16, 2022, 10:48 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2012
Posts: 6,165
|
|
July 17, 2022, 08:08 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 21, 2013
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,695
|
My bulk gas gun 556 55 gr ammo is running 25.6 gr of W748 . I like using this load as 100 yd SR reduced High Power training. W748 isnt perfect but it's a dam versatile powder that also works very well in 308. W748 is a dirty powder , and it's somewhat temp sensitive but again i've had good sucess finding this powder during panics when the shelves are stripped of Varg / 4895 / 335 and so on.
__________________
"To be old an wise you must have been young and stupid" |
July 17, 2022, 08:11 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 1, 2001
Posts: 6,331
|
IMO, TAC and CFE223 are great AR15 powders
|
July 17, 2022, 08:12 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 17, 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,894
|
Does the Gentle Reader include spherical AA 2520 in this "... meh..." category ?
|
July 17, 2022, 01:11 PM | #15 |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,061
|
I think 2520 is likely to do best with a magnum primer and with bullet weights at 62-grains and up to keep fouling down. With the 55-grain bullets he's looking to load for, I've used powders as fast as Reloader 10X and even IMR 4198. Benchmark and H322 are other possibilities for that weight. As with any quicker powder, you just want to be sure your gun functions well with them. They won't produce tip-top velocities without going over pressure, but I've found them good for general range fodder.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle |
July 17, 2022, 04:41 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
|
Most 55 gr bullets sit on powder charges of 22 to 26 gr, with a few outlying powders that range as low as 19 gr and as high as 28 gr.
Unless you really want to use an outlier, it doesn't matter too much which powder you choose. (So using what is available to you shouldn't be a big deal.) However, I have found RL-10X and CFE223 to be absolutely filthy in all applications where I have tried them. Avoid those powders if you don't like excess soot and grime. My ARs eat a lot of Ramshot TAC.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. |
July 17, 2022, 05:35 PM | #17 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 17, 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,894
|
Quote:
GoTo AR (Hvy) Load w/ AA2520 |
|
July 17, 2022, 05:41 PM | #18 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2012
Posts: 6,165
|
Quote:
|
|
July 17, 2022, 07:16 PM | #19 |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,061
|
Keep in mind that peak pressure has a lot to do with fouling levels. Too little temperature and pressure and you wind up with more fouling than when pressures are run nearer the top of the range.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle |
July 17, 2022, 07:27 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,541
|
I tried hard to like AA2520, it metered so well. But in two .308 barrels and a .223, it was just not quite as accurate as extruded powders. MY barrels. Good luck with yours.
|
July 17, 2022, 09:46 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 1, 2009
Posts: 4,232
|
TAC is cheap and available, works great with 69 and 77 SMK's out to 600 yards
__________________
“How do I get to the next level?” Well, you get to the next level by being the first one on the range and the last one to leave.” – Jerry Miculek |
July 18, 2022, 11:29 AM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2012
Posts: 6,165
|
|
July 18, 2022, 05:36 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 15, 2011
Location: Chesterton Ind.
Posts: 822
|
I was able to get 16 lbs of LT-32. It shoots great with 55 grain bullets it’s just a dirty girl of powder
|
July 18, 2022, 09:22 PM | #24 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 14, 2012
Location: Bowling Green, Ky
Posts: 706
|
Quote:
Bart B is absolutely correct I never had any great luck with ball powders at all as far as accuracy, and in bigger cases like 30-06 you really need a magnum primers to ignites those the best. I have several jugs of 846, 844 just sitting on the shelf now to be used for plinking purposes |
|
July 18, 2022, 10:35 PM | #25 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 28, 2006
Location: South Central Michigan...near
Posts: 6,501
|
Quote:
Wouldn't the G.I. duplication load use Midwest Powders WC844? Isn't that the supplus powder obtained by pulling down G.I. 5.56/55fmj loads? |
|
|
|