The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old September 23, 2015, 10:11 AM   #1
Mosin-Marauder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 18, 2014
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,320
Overcharges?

An Overcharge doesn't make a rifle unsafe to fire, does it? I was reloading last night and wondered this. If a rifle fired something like 1-5 grains over max, would that be enough to reset the lugs in the action or do any other damage?
__________________
Proud owner of three (four-ish) pieces of history!
K-31, Mosin-Nagant M91/30, M24/47 Mauser, Norinco SKS.
"You might as well appeal against a thunderstorm..."
William Tecumseh Sherman
Mosin-Marauder is offline  
Old September 23, 2015, 10:25 AM   #2
ckpj99
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 24, 2011
Posts: 386
In short, yes, it could potentially harm the rifle and the shooter. That's why "maximum" charges exist.

If you're lucky with an overcharge, you might just put a ring in your chamber or throat. If you're unlucky, you could be pulling the trigger on a pipe bomb that you've conveniently pressed your cheek against.

The risk of overcharging isn't necessary putting too much pressure on the lugs of the bolt. The pressure of a round going off expands in all directions. If the pressure exceeds the ability of the bullet to get out of the way fast enough, it's got to expand somewhere, likely out of the side of chamber or sides of the barrel.

All that being said, there's going to be someone who comes along and says that most modern rifle over overbuilt for the pressures of the cartridges they were designed for, and that they were careful when developing their load and they've shot thousands of rounds loaded over max through their rifle.

Of course there are exceptions, people have been hot rodding cartridges since cartridges were invented. People have also been blowing up guns since guns were invented.

Unless you have a lot of experience and completely understand what you're doing, I see absolutely no reason to exceed maximum published load data.
ckpj99 is offline  
Old September 23, 2015, 10:27 AM   #3
Mosin-Marauder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 18, 2014
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,320
I dont intend to, just was wondering.Thanks
__________________
Proud owner of three (four-ish) pieces of history!
K-31, Mosin-Nagant M91/30, M24/47 Mauser, Norinco SKS.
"You might as well appeal against a thunderstorm..."
William Tecumseh Sherman
Mosin-Marauder is offline  
Old September 23, 2015, 10:32 AM   #4
serf 'rett
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 25, 2009
Location: Stuttgart, AR
Posts: 1,569
Yes it could be unsafe, especially in older firearms (which you appear to like).
__________________
A lack of planning on your part does not necessarily constitute an emergency on my part.
serf 'rett is offline  
Old September 23, 2015, 10:38 AM   #5
F. Guffey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 18, 2008
Posts: 7,249
Quote:
An Overcharge doesn't make a rifle unsafe to fire, does it?
Rifle: No, and then there is that 'depends'. In the old days reloaders preferred Winchester cases for rifles because straight across the options the Winchester had the most capacity then there was that thing about Winchester cases weighed less than other cases by other manufacturers.

then there is that thing about barrels that are +/- in diameter. Then there is the reloader. To answer your question a reloader should know the effect pressure has on the case when fired. A case head upsets when fired. How much? normal case head upset is considered to be .00025" with factory loads. A case head that expands .001" with the first firing is the effect of the 'from 1 grain to 5 grains' over the maximum.

We spend a lot of time talking about case life.

F. Guffey
F. Guffey is offline  
Old September 23, 2015, 10:57 AM   #6
TimSr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 8, 2013
Location: Rittman, Ohio
Posts: 2,074
Some loads in some guns can be damaged before you reach max. That is why they have a starting load and tell you to "work up" from there. If max load was safe in every gun, there would be no reason for starting loads. Many people get the false idea that starting load to max load is the range that is safe for their gun as opposed to the point of where to start, and where to stop only when no problems are encountered on the way up.
TimSr is offline  
Old September 23, 2015, 11:56 AM   #7
T. O'Heir
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
"...1-5 grains over max..." One, not likely. Five, more likely.
Like F. Guffey says, then there is that 'depends'. Manuals change over time due to the testing using different powder lots, much better testing equipment, etc. And they vary from one manufacturer to another, but Max is Max.
.00025" is insignificant. That's 1/100,000th of an inch.
__________________
Spelling and grammar count!
T. O'Heir is offline  
Old September 23, 2015, 01:28 PM   #8
jwrowland77
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 23, 2012
Location: Conway, Arkansas
Posts: 1,398
The thing is, to find the max for your rifle slowly, by working up. Ken Waters discusses this in the book Pet Loads complete volume.

There's ways to do it as well. Like Guffey mentioned, using a case with more case capacity. Then there's loading longer than book OAL (not at lands or into lands.
jwrowland77 is offline  
Old September 23, 2015, 02:06 PM   #9
Slamfire
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 27, 2007
Posts: 5,261
Lets assume the cartridge case does not rupture. Firearms are built to carry a load, but they are not built to indefinitely carry a load, a reasonable number of load cycles would be between 5000 and 10000 rounds. At the end of its service life, you would expect cracks in the locking mechanism due to fatigue failure. A locking mechanism could be built that fired indefinitely, but it would be awfully heavy.

So given the action is to carry a load, and the lifetime is around 5,000 to 10,000 rounds, if the load is increased, the fatigue life is lessened. How much is very unpredictable, about the best answer is sooner.


These are examples of modern mechanisms that cracked, obviously with over pressure loads. If gas has spilled back into the action, because of cartridge rupture, the shooter could have been hurt. All I know is that these pictures were posted on the web, and I assume the shooter walked away unhurt.

Commercial Mauser FN 264 Win Mag






M70 FNSPR 300 WSM






__________________
If I'm not shooting, I'm reloading.
Slamfire is offline  
Old September 23, 2015, 02:35 PM   #10
kilimanjaro
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 23, 2009
Posts: 3,963
One thing to consider about reloads, is that you check your work as you go and check it again, then check it again. Rule No. 1 is, if in doubt, throw it out, just like the stuff in the refrigerator. At least you get to dismantle the round and use the components again in the correct amounts. If someone gives you some handloads, and you were not present when they were made, to verify the loading, accept them if you must, but dismantle them and use the components yourself. Pope Francis could give me a box of his favorite Swiss Guard loads, and I would not fire them, be they blessed or not.

Damage to your rifle is cumulative, like hearing loss. The metal is malleable to a point, then brittleness occurs and it's a given that failure can then occur at any time, even without a hot load. The right combination of receiver temperature and the next pressure event, meaning the next round fired, can cause a failure.

In addition, a lot of rifles are old. As in 75 years old, for a rifle made in 1940. Look for signs of metal aging and fatigue in your surplus rifles, such as surface cracks or crazing. Use a good magnifying glass. Wartime production lines may not have used the best components or processes to make the steel, or properly treated the metals, or have been reliable about rejecting minimally acceptable materials or machining that would not have been tolerated in peacetime.

There are lots of reasons not to use hot loads, certainly a lot more than there are excuses to use them.
kilimanjaro is offline  
Old September 23, 2015, 02:50 PM   #11
jmr40
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,792
Depending on the load, powder, rifle bullet, etc., it isn't unusual to see guys load .5-1 gr over published max loads. Occasionally as much as 2-3 gr. But they are working very close to the edge in my opinion. That load might be safe in 1 individual rifle, but not another. It might be safe at 70 degrees, but not at 100 degrees.

As said in some combos it could be dangerous even below a max load. I 've never known of anyone trying 5 gr over max listed loads. I wouldn't advise going over published numbers.

Now at times you'll see numbers in one loading manual that are 2-3 gr different for a max charge compared to another manual. I might use the load showing more powder, but would start low and work up carefully.
jmr40 is offline  
Old September 23, 2015, 05:03 PM   #12
Average Joe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 29, 2005
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,323
Just to be safe, I always stay a grain or two under max.
Average Joe is offline  
Old September 23, 2015, 07:42 PM   #13
iraiam
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 6, 2012
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 1,057
Yes, an overcharge can certainly make the rifle unsafe to fire, that's a pretty vague statement, I know. But I can share a anecdotal story I witnessed many years ago. During a rifle target shoot, A rifle was loaded with a hand load and fired. Whatever was wrong with the round caused the bolt action to fail and the bolt came out and struck the shooter in the face. It was fortunately not a serious bodily injury, but a smack to the face is not any fun.

I did not personally know the re-loader/shooter so I did not become privy to all the specifics, but the incident did leave a lasting impression on me.

I never go over published numbers, and in some cases I stop well short of published maximums, either because of pressure signs or it's more accurate that way.
__________________
NRA Lifetime Member Since 1999

"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people except for a few public officials." George Mason
iraiam is offline  
Old September 23, 2015, 08:12 PM   #14
4runnerman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 16, 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,577
Most cases- 1 GN- probebly not-5 GN's-probebly yes. Most rifles will handle hot loads to a point. Not one I would want to find out though. Also IMHO- I have never found a load in the max range that has shot as accurate as a Mid Range load, so no reason to go there. It is also hard on brass.
Re-edit- 1 Gn in rifle loads-probebly not-Pistol loads it could be very bad JU JU depending on what powder you are using. Titegroup--1 GN is very badddddd JU JU.
__________________
NRA Certified RSO
NwCP- Performance Isn't Optional
4runnerman is offline  
Old September 23, 2015, 08:40 PM   #15
steve4102
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 23, 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,949
depends on a lot of things, case volume for one.

5gr over in a 223 will be bad, 5 gr over n a 300 Rum would hardly make a difference.
steve4102 is offline  
Old September 23, 2015, 11:54 PM   #16
Pistol 14
Junior Member
 
Join Date: September 22, 2015
Posts: 5
https://youtu.be/gfiXFyIbOZw

I'd encourage you to check this video out. It tells us a lot about overcharging.
Pistol 14 is offline  
Old September 24, 2015, 12:07 AM   #17
Clark
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 4, 1999
Location: WA, the ever blue state
Posts: 4,678
CAUTION: The following post includes loading data beyond or not covered by currently published maximums for this cartridge. USE AT YOUR OWN RISK. Neither the writer, The Firing Line, nor the staff of TFL assume any liability for any damage or injury resulting from use of this information.

In strong rifles, I work up to brass failure, and back off on the powder charge by a safety margin I design per the variables involved.

I wear safety glasses and hearing protection when target practicing or varmint hunting.
I do not wear safety glasses or hearing protection while big game hunting.

When I am trying to blow up a gun, I do it with a work up, and write down everything that happens. I try to distinguish primary failures from secondary failures. I try to calculate the gun's strength and predict what will fail at what load. Lots of strong guns will not break in a work up, but when the brass fails, gas cutting will damage a lot of the gun. Lots of weak guns just blow up. What separates weak guns from strong guns is the thickness of the steel. It does not matter WHAT kind of steel it is, if it is 5 times thicker, it is stronger.
__________________
The word 'forum" does not mean "not criticizing books."
"Ad hominem fallacy" is not the same as point by point criticism of books. If you bought the book, and believe it all, it may FEEL like an ad hominem attack, but you might strive to accept other points of view may exist.
Are we a nation of competing ideas, or a nation of forced conformity of thought?
Clark is offline  
Old September 24, 2015, 12:18 AM   #18
briandg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 4, 2010
Posts: 5,468
There can't be a generic answer. A caseload of bullseye may blow the receiver to dust an overcharge of other powders could cause metal fatigue and weakening. Your case may rupture, and if the metals of the gun are weak, who knows what will be damaged?

Any quality firearm is able to withstand high pressure and abuse. They all have limits.

I have a book by one of the best designers ever, and he stated that 5000fps was right around the corner. He predicted that over fifty years ago. This tells me that no matter what we do, there are limitations. Projectile weapons in this class may never go much farther than what we have achieved. If we could design powders that accelerated, so that the pressure remained constant, who knows?
briandg is offline  
Old September 24, 2015, 06:25 AM   #19
TimSr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 8, 2013
Location: Rittman, Ohio
Posts: 2,074
Its funny but I have found some rifle loads where the case wouldn't even hold published max.


Then you have .25 acp where 1 grain over max would be a double charge.
TimSr is offline  
Old September 24, 2015, 09:24 AM   #20
Clark
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 4, 1999
Location: WA, the ever blue state
Posts: 4,678
Quote:
TimSr
Then you have .25 acp where 1 grain over max would be a double charge.
Cartridge brass is C26000 [ 70% copper, 30% zinc] temper H06 [extra hard] that has a tensile yield at 65,300 psi.

But as a cartridge case it is not a simple shape and is not just in tension. To calculate the stress on a case to predict the pressure at which the primer pocket will get loose, the accurate way to do it is with Von Mises calculations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Von_Mises_yield_criterion

If we do that for various cartridges and compare it to the registered SAAMI max average pressure, we see we live in some kind of Bizarro world where things may be the opposite of expectations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bizarro_World

The hierarchy I have found through experiment along with a theory freind has calculated with Von Mises calculation:

Starting at the weakest going to the highest strength:
10mm
25acp
7.62x39mm Large Boxer primer pocket
.
Mauser case head with Large Boxer [22-250, 30-06, etc.]
.
Belted magnums
.
222 Win case head [223 rem]
--------------------------------
So strong it does not matter below this line
-----------------------------------
6mmBR [small Boxer]
.
30-30 [despite the nonsense in the Speer load book]
.
.
32 S&W [ strongest case known to man, registered at 15 kpsi]
__________________
The word 'forum" does not mean "not criticizing books."
"Ad hominem fallacy" is not the same as point by point criticism of books. If you bought the book, and believe it all, it may FEEL like an ad hominem attack, but you might strive to accept other points of view may exist.
Are we a nation of competing ideas, or a nation of forced conformity of thought?
Clark is offline  
Old September 24, 2015, 04:04 PM   #21
44 AMP
Staff
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,677
Quote:
An Overcharge doesn't make a rifle unsafe to fire, does it?
What do you think a proof load is????

As others have stated, "safe" or not depends on specifically what the overcharge was and the individual rifle it happened in.

I know of a Remington rifle (.308Win) that got fired with about a half case full of pistol powder. Case rupture, vented gas, some small parts broken, too a gunsmith to open the action and remove the ruptured brass.

Indications were it survived 90-110,000 psi. Rifle was repaired and returned to use, and has been fine for over 40 years since.

A different rifle model might not have fared so well.

Remember that the listed MAX loads are NOT max loads for blow up safety, they are the safe max WORKING loads with the particular combination of gun and ammo components tested.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
44 AMP is offline  
Old September 24, 2015, 07:43 PM   #22
Slamfire
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 27, 2007
Posts: 5,261
Quote:
What do you think a proof load is????
American's seem to think a proof load is a destructive load, I think they got that from Hatcher's Notebook. A proof load is, more or less, a historical test. Most of the proof loads are a 30% over standard load. It is not meant to blow up the rifle, but rather, to put a calibrated one time over stress situation. You could call it a workmanship test, and prior to 1920, it would have been a valid test. I am of the opinion that in today's manufacturing environment, with consistent materials, and consistent production processes, that a proof load is un necessary.

Very high pressures will blow up a gun, but so will metal fatigue. Don't discount metal fatigue. The British Comet, an early jet airliner, three of these jets fatigue fractured with a loss of everyone on board.
__________________
If I'm not shooting, I'm reloading.

Last edited by Slamfire; September 25, 2015 at 09:00 AM.
Slamfire is offline  
Old September 24, 2015, 07:48 PM   #23
higgite
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 21, 2010
Posts: 1,024
Doesn't the term "overcharge" pretty much say it all?
higgite is offline  
Old September 25, 2015, 12:11 PM   #24
F. Guffey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 18, 2008
Posts: 7,249
Quote:
Doesn't the term "overcharge" pretty much say it all?
Yes, again, I was accused of being involved in some very risk stuff. I did not agree.

Then I purchased 4 rifles for $25.00 each with the understanding they were suspect, I did not agree, I tested all 4 receivers with one barrel and one bolt. The length of the chamber varied .001" from one receiver to the next. With the loads that were considered to be 'risky' the length of the chambers did not change.

There are loose barrels, tight barrels, then there are chambers, I am the fan of cutting down on all that case travel. I want nothing between my case and the chamber but air, not a lot of air, I understand air is fluid, I understand air flows, I understand air can be compressed.

F. Guffey
F. Guffey is offline  
Old September 26, 2015, 11:17 PM   #25
reynolds357
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 10, 2012
Posts: 6,161
Mosin, a lot depends on what cartridge and what type powder is being used. 5 grain overcharge in a .30-30 winchester and a 5 grain overcharge in a .30-378 WBY are a world of difference in what they will do to the pressure. .30-30 is a small case that uses fast powder. 5 gr over would be devesdating. .30-378 WBY. Huge case, extremely slow powder. 5 gr. overcharge would probably not even blow the primer.
reynolds357 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.10606 seconds with 8 queries