The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > Law and Civil Rights

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old September 5, 2017, 01:35 PM   #1
TXAZ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 5, 2010
Location: McMurdo Sound Texas
Posts: 4,322
Hurricane Irma = Second Amendment appears to go out the window in US Virgin Islands?

I read this and thought "Really?" I looked for the order but didn't find it, but the article indicates the governor believes the National Guard may need the guns and ammo: "U.S. Virgin Islands Gov. Kenneth Mapp signed an emergency order allowing the seizure of private guns, ammunition, explosives and property the National Guard may need to respond to Hurricane Irma."

Would love to hear Frank and the other legal eagles discuss the Second Amendment vs. a hurricane approaching / disaster prep.

US Virgin Islands Governor Mapp seizing guns ahead of Hurricane Irma


I don't see a snowball's chance in Texas, and don't understand the logic (or legality) from the USVI governor.
__________________

Cave illos in guns et backhoes
TXAZ is offline  
Old September 5, 2017, 05:26 PM   #2
spacemanspiff
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 16, 2002
Location: alaska
Posts: 3,498
Is the National Guard planning on shooting the Hurricane?
__________________
"Every man alone is sincere; at the entrance of a second person hypocrisy begins." - Ralph Waldo Emerson
"People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use." - Soren Kierkegaard
spacemanspiff is offline  
Old September 5, 2017, 05:36 PM   #3
Aguila Blanca
Staff
 
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,459
What could the National Guard possibly do with a black powder, 1851 Colt revolver close during a hurricane?

That order has to be unconstitutional (I think), but the Supreme Court won't have a chance to say so until several years down the road. This is why we don't like permits and FOIDs (or is it FOICs?).

Tommy Lee Jones had the right idea: https://youtu.be/77ZuwtX3B80?t=10

Last edited by Aguila Blanca; September 5, 2017 at 05:43 PM.
Aguila Blanca is offline  
Old September 6, 2017, 07:44 AM   #4
steve4102
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 23, 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,952
Quote:
Originally Posted by TXAZ
I looked for the order but didn't find it,
http://dailycaller.com/wp-content/up...NATL-GUARD.pdf


Do the VI have the same Constitutional Rights and protections as US Citizens?

What about the Federal Law that was passed in 2006 that prohibits the confiscation of legal firearms from law-abiding citizens during states of emergency? Does the VI have this legal protection as well?
steve4102 is offline  
Old September 6, 2017, 07:53 AM   #5
TXAZ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 5, 2010
Location: McMurdo Sound Texas
Posts: 4,322
Thanks for the link Steve. There it is in black and white.
__________________

Cave illos in guns et backhoes
TXAZ is offline  
Old September 6, 2017, 08:12 AM   #6
Doyle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Rainbow City, Alabama
Posts: 7,167
It looks like this order is worded so as not to be a "confiscation" but a "commandeering".
Doyle is offline  
Old September 6, 2017, 11:36 AM   #7
rickyrick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2010
Posts: 8,236
I thought this was internet fakery but it keeps coming up.
Has anyone verified the statutes referred to in the document?
rickyrick is offline  
Old September 6, 2017, 12:35 PM   #8
OldMarksman
Staff
 
Join Date: June 8, 2008
Posts: 4,022
Second Amendment in the Virgin Islands? Really?

If the Bill of Rights applied in the Virgin islands, this would be more of a Fifth Amendment issue than a Second Amendment issue.

But the Bill of Rights originally limited the authority of the Federal Government. Later, through the Incorporation Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment, some parts of the BoR were extended to limit the power of state governments.

The USVI, an unincorporated and organized territory, is governed under the provisions of the Revised Organic Act of the Virgin Islands, enacted in 1954.

The territory has no constitution.

The islands were previously called the Danish West Indies, and were acquired from Denmark in 1916.
OldMarksman is offline  
Old September 6, 2017, 01:13 PM   #9
ShootistPRS
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 3, 2017
Posts: 1,583
As a US territory the US Virgin Islands have US National parks and the citizens are considered US citizens since 1927. They submitted a constitution to the US congress but it was not accepted and returned for revision but has not been resubmitted. They do have a bill of rights but I have never seen a copy of it. Beyond that, I have no knowledge of their National government.
ShootistPRS is offline  
Old September 6, 2017, 02:09 PM   #10
rebs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 10, 2012
Posts: 3,881
hummmm The NG must plan on using fire power against the hurricane ?
rebs is offline  
Old September 6, 2017, 03:23 PM   #11
TXAZ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 5, 2010
Location: McMurdo Sound Texas
Posts: 4,322
Quote:
Originally Posted by rebs View Post
hummmm The NG must plan on using fire power against the hurricane ?
Maybe they were thinking of a study in the 60's showing that using REAL firepower, aka Hydrogen Bomb, exploded inside a hurricane eye, would seriously diminish the storm, scaled down for USVI?
I believe Popular Science did an article on it.
__________________

Cave illos in guns et backhoes
TXAZ is offline  
Old September 6, 2017, 04:31 PM   #12
DaleA
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 12, 2002
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 5,312
Hurricanes and nukes...Here's an article about it on the 'National Geographic ' page:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2...clear-weapons/
Spoiler Alert: It doesn't seem practical.
DaleA is offline  
Old September 6, 2017, 05:49 PM   #13
TXAZ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 5, 2010
Location: McMurdo Sound Texas
Posts: 4,322
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaleA View Post
Hurricanes and nukes...Here's an article about it on the 'National Geographic ' page:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2...clear-weapons/
Spoiler Alert: It doesn't seem practical.
If I remember right, the 'dispersal of radiation' kinda made it a bad idea back then.
__________________

Cave illos in guns et backhoes
TXAZ is offline  
Old September 6, 2017, 06:06 PM   #14
Bartholomew Roberts
member
 
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
Well, using federal funds to confiscate or disarm lawful owners would be in violation of federal law: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/109/hr5013/text

I'm skeptical the USVI is not relying heavily on federal funds as a territory. I'm also 100% certain the NRA is salivating at the prospect of the USVI attempting to comandeer legally owned firearms given their legislative and litigation success after Katrina.
Bartholomew Roberts is offline  
Old September 6, 2017, 08:07 PM   #15
Mike38
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 28, 2009
Location: North Central Illinois
Posts: 2,710
Around 30 minutes ago, the Governor of the USVI was interviewed via telephone by Tucker Carlson of Fox News. The Governor was asked no less than 3 times to clarify this situation. He said that there is no way he legally can, nor does he want to, confiscate firearms and / or ammunition from citizens of the USVI. After the interview, it seemed to me that Tucker Carlson had his doubts the Governor was speaking the truth just then, so take this for what it's worth.
Mike38 is offline  
Old September 6, 2017, 08:26 PM   #16
Aguila Blanca
Staff
 
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,459
Here's a link to a copy of the actual order: http://dailycaller.com/wp-content/up...NATL-GUARD.pdf

Quote:
... the Adjutant General is authorized and directed to seize arms, ammunition, explosives, incendiary material and any other property that may be required by the military forces for the performance of this emergency mission, in accordance with the rules of force promulgated by the Virgin Islands National Guard and approved by the Virgin Islands Department of Justice.
The language of the order (if that purported copy floating around on-line is a genuine facsimile of the actual order) seems to very clearly call for confiscating ("seize" does not carry with it any connotation of taking by eminent domain) arms and ammunition. I wonder how the governor thinks he can tell Tucker Carlson he has no authority to order that when he just ordered that. Is he acknowledging that he issued an unlawful order?
Aguila Blanca is offline  
Old September 6, 2017, 08:47 PM   #17
rickyrick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2010
Posts: 8,236
That's kinda why I think the order is a fake. Everyone is posting the link from the Daily Caller... seems the governmental website would post such an order on its page.
rickyrick is offline  
Old September 6, 2017, 08:51 PM   #18
rickyrick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2010
Posts: 8,236
I guess because of the storm the website for the governor is down... I checked
rickyrick is offline  
Old September 7, 2017, 03:27 AM   #19
dreaming
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 19, 2016
Posts: 186
The order isn't fake, but it isn't about confiscating firearms from folk. Tucker Carlson interviewed the Governor of the U.S. Virgin Islands and I have read the order which was posted. It empowers the National Guard to obtain firearms from retailers, if they are needed in the emergency, without going through regular purchasing channels. The government must still pay for the weapons. Resident's firearms are not being taken.
dreaming is offline  
Old September 7, 2017, 05:04 AM   #20
Aguila Blanca
Staff
 
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,459
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreaming
The order isn't fake, but it isn't about confiscating firearms from folk. Tucker Carlson interviewed the Governor of the U.S. Virgin Islands and I have read the order which was posted. It empowers the National Guard to obtain firearms from retailers, if they are needed in the emergency, without going through regular purchasing channels. The government must still pay for the weapons. Resident's firearms are not being taken.
That may be what you think it means, and it may even be what it's supposed to mean, but on its face that's not what it says. However, it references Title 23, Section 1520, Virgin Islands Code. Without knowing what that section of the VI Code says, we don't know what the order actually does and doesn't authorize.

Note that the word "retailers" does not appear anywhere in the order.
Aguila Blanca is offline  
Old September 7, 2017, 09:23 AM   #21
Tom Servo
Staff
 
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
Quote:
The USVI, an unincorporated and organized territory, is governed under the provisions of the Revised Organic Act of the Virgin Islands, enacted in 1954.
To follow up, the US Constitution and its applicability in the USVI is something of a gray area. A series of SCOTUS decisions known as the Insular Cases will likely be used to defend the Governor's actions. It's not as clear-cut as the NRA case against New Orleans in 2006.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change.
--Randall Munroe
Tom Servo is offline  
Old September 7, 2017, 04:10 PM   #22
Paul B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 28, 1999
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,801
Surely the NG in the VI have their issued M16 rifles, right? Why would they need any civilian firearms? Definitely sounds like confiscation to me.
Paul B.
__________________
COMPROMISE IS NOT AN OPTION!
Paul B. is offline  
Old September 7, 2017, 06:20 PM   #23
Bartholomew Roberts
member
 
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
Quote:
It's not as clear-cut as the NRA case against New Orleans in 2006.
Well, they haven't identified any parties with standing yet. So that's a big hurdle.
Bartholomew Roberts is offline  
Old September 7, 2017, 07:25 PM   #24
rickyrick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2010
Posts: 8,236
On the surface, a militia not under the purview of the US Constitution but has governmental authority sounds pretty ominous to me... especially one ready to disarm citizens.
rickyrick is offline  
Old September 11, 2017, 04:13 PM   #25
hdwhit
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 22, 2017
Posts: 1,011
Quote:
Bartholomew Roberts wrote:
Well, using federal funds to confiscate or disarm lawful owners would be in violation of federal law:
No. Not under the statute you cited. That statute derives its authority from the Second Amendment which does not exist in the Virgin Islands.
hdwhit is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.10130 seconds with 8 queries