The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Semi-automatic Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old July 22, 2021, 03:53 AM   #1
Classic12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 12, 2020
Posts: 696
Beretta 92 series

Some people love them, some loathe them. I like them and accumulated a few over the years

I bought my first one in 1989, Lethal Weapon was all the rage then. It was a second hand 92 F made in 1986. Shot it a lot, then tinkered with it, threaded barrel and B&T silencer, Tasco pro point on a B square mount. I still use it occasionally and it’s still going strong.





In 1999 I had the opportunity to acquire this 93r at a bankruptcy auction, complete with box, two mags and folding stock. Undated but the serial number is close to the 92 F above, so it might be a 1986 too. I asked Beretta but they sadly never bothered to respond.





In 2010 I bought this 92 FS made in 1993, I prefer the straight dust cover vs the slanted one



It also has an accessory, an 8” sport barrel.



A hard to find one that took me a long time to get. 92 Combat made in 2001





Another not so common one, I had an instant crush on it, 92 steel I from 2010



Classic12 is offline  
Old July 22, 2021, 03:55 AM   #2
Classic12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 12, 2020
Posts: 696
Finally I recently bought a M9A1, NIB from a private seller 40% below list price



Family photos







Classic12 is offline  
Old July 22, 2021, 10:50 AM   #3
Pumpkin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 18, 2020
Location: Seguin Texas
Posts: 422
Berettas (92s, 96s, 87s, 85s, 1935s, etc.) are like Ferraris, Maserati's and Sophia Loren, Sexy Italians
Pumpkin is offline  
Old July 22, 2021, 01:16 PM   #4
hub1home
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 15, 2014
Posts: 182
Very NICE collection! Thank you for taking the time to show it to us. I have a 92F that I bought in 1985. When I first got it, I fired misc. junk ammo including reloads through it as fast as I could pull the trigger. I could not get it to jam!
hub1home is offline  
Old July 22, 2021, 04:08 PM   #5
Metric
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 4, 2016
Posts: 344
How would you describe the evolution of Beretta's QC from the mid 1980's to the present?
Metric is offline  
Old July 22, 2021, 04:28 PM   #6
TailGator
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 8, 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,787
Great stuff. I only have one 92, an Inox wearing walnut grips like yours. I have an 84 that I bought used, a PX4 Compact in 9 mm, and even a Neos. (I know, the Neos styling leaves a lot to be desired, but it is quite accurate and reliable, and young people actually take to it.) I like them all.
TailGator is offline  
Old July 22, 2021, 06:44 PM   #7
GaryED50
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 19, 2012
Location: Dawsonville Georgia
Posts: 542
Very awesome love the pics thank you
GaryED50 is offline  
Old July 22, 2021, 06:51 PM   #8
Pahoo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 16, 2006
Location: IOWA
Posts: 8,783
A Classic

Quote:
Berettas
In my book, they are a classic !!!! ......

Thanks for the eye-candy and;
Be Safe !!!
__________________
'Fundamental truths' are easy to recognize because they are verified daily through simple observation and thus, require no testing.
Pahoo is offline  
Old July 22, 2021, 09:00 PM   #9
wild cat mccane
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 3,626
On the 93R, is that a lanyard loop poking kinda out of sorts? I'm confused on the bottom of the grip.

Thanks!
__________________
My wife is a pulmonologist (respiratory Dr) and epidemiologist. If you have any questions on COVID, please reach out to me in PM.
wild cat mccane is offline  
Old July 23, 2021, 01:56 AM   #10
Hawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,188
Beretta has a better finish but I like the Taurus PT92 better because of the safety. I would prefer it without the decocker tho.
Hawg is offline  
Old July 23, 2021, 05:02 AM   #11
jetinteriorguy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 28, 2013
Posts: 3,175
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawg View Post
Beretta has a better finish but I like the Taurus PT92 better because of the safety. I would prefer it without the decocker tho.
You would like the PT99 then, it’s safety only, no decocker.
jetinteriorguy is offline  
Old July 23, 2021, 07:21 AM   #12
jmr40
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,808
I've had a few over the years. I can certainly respect the guns, but don't particularly like the styling or design. I've let all of mine go. If spending my money on a pistol I prefer other designs. But if I were issued one I'd carry it with complete confidence. They are reliable and accurate.
__________________
"If you're still doing things the same way you were doing them 10 years ago, you're doing it wrong"

Winston Churchill
jmr40 is offline  
Old July 23, 2021, 09:04 AM   #13
Classic12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 12, 2020
Posts: 696
Beretta 92 series

Quote:
Originally Posted by Metric View Post
How would you describe the evolution of Beretta's QC from the mid 1980's to the present?

I have other older Berettas (not 92 series), I yet have to own one with quality issues.

Oh the medallion on the wooden grip of the st 92 FS fell off once.
Classic12 is offline  
Old July 23, 2021, 09:05 AM   #14
Classic12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 12, 2020
Posts: 696
Quote:
Originally Posted by wild cat mccane View Post
On the 93R, is that a lanyard loop poking kinda out of sorts? I'm confused on the bottom of the grip.

Thanks!

That’s where the folding stock attaches



Classic12 is offline  
Old July 23, 2021, 09:27 AM   #15
Hawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,188
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetinteriorguy View Post
You would like the PT99 then, it’s safety only, no decocker.
That looks like a winner.
Hawg is offline  
Old July 23, 2021, 10:04 AM   #16
adamBomb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 19, 2015
Location: coastal NC
Posts: 645
Dude, that's awesome! Seriously one of the coolest/sexiest guns. 92FS is my home defense pistol as its got so many qualities that make it perfect for home/range.
adamBomb is offline  
Old July 23, 2021, 01:41 PM   #17
Victor252
Member
 
Join Date: January 26, 2021
Posts: 19
Massad Ayoob likes them too:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TN--QZp8S0U

I think it's a good gun for beginners because it's a very safe-handling gun.
Victor252 is offline  
Old July 23, 2021, 02:56 PM   #18
Metric
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 4, 2016
Posts: 344
Quote:
Originally Posted by Classic12 View Post
I have other older Berettas (not 92 series), I yet have to own one with quality issues.

Oh the medallion on the wooden grip of the st 92 FS fell off once.
I ask because my impression (from a sample size of 10, dating from the 70's, 80's, 90's, and 00's) is that quality peaked in the mid-to-late 80's. Little imperfections started to become more noticeable, the more recently they were made. Nothing horrendous, just little things like internal tool marks, slide action smoothness, etc.

Then I was rather shocked to see some very recent pictures (2020) of markings like this one:


By comparison, this one from 1987 (I picked it up surplus last year for a song) is pretty clearly the best-finished of any Beretta I've ever had. Slide finish is a near mirror blue that looks like it was cut out of obsidian. MSRP would be $1000+ if it were made today.





As I mentioned, this has been my experience, but it could be just a statistical fluke.
Metric is offline  
Old July 24, 2021, 04:22 AM   #19
hemiram
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 6, 2005
Location: Toledo, ohio
Posts: 762
My first 92 was bought about 6 months after I turned 21 in early '78. I loved it, and shot it a lot. I was moving back to Ohio in '82, and sold it to a friend who still has it. Since then, I've had 3 more, and the last one was the best one, all around. A LEO trade in 92FS, barely a mark on it, with night sites, 8 mags, the case, paperwork, etc. I even found out who it was issued to and found a pic of him online, along with an artlcle about his retirement after 45 years as a cop. I bought the gun less than a month later. Sadly, I had to sell it in 2013 when I got hit for a huge tax bill. Now I just have a Taurus PT-92, and it's OK, but not as smooth as any of my "real" 92's were.
hemiram is offline  
Old July 24, 2021, 06:14 AM   #20
stuckinthe60s
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 31, 2017
Location: Va., Ct., Mo..
Posts: 877
seals dumped the 92f in 1990 due to single rail cracking issues. they went to the 226.

I do enjoy the dual rail guns. they point like a charm.
__________________
Retired Military Aviation
Former Member Navy Shooting Team
Distinguished Pistol Shot,NRA Shotgun/Pistol Instructor
NSSA All American, Skeet/Trap Range Owner
stuckinthe60s is offline  
Old July 24, 2021, 09:00 AM   #21
Siggy-06
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 2, 2014
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,148
My Italian 92FS is my go to pistol for home defense and longer range pistol shooting. I changed out the spring to a D spring and added some Lok thin g10 grips. It’s a tack driver, even at 25+ yards. I might get a 92X eventually too.
__________________
Flicks just like a lighter, just a different kind of fire.
Siggy-06 is offline  
Old July 24, 2021, 11:24 AM   #22
ChasHam
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 27, 2018
Location: Deep South
Posts: 130
In 1981, I picked up an old model Taurus PT92 at a gun show. It was a bit rough cosmetically so I got it for a real good price. But mechanical/function-wise, it was and still is fine.

Flawlessly digests a wide assortment of self-cast lead RN, commercial lead RN as well as jacketed HP and ball reloads flawlessly.

I must report though that the lead rounds do tend to leave a little something behind in the barrel to remember them by. I used to put a magazine of ball through to end the range session making cleaning easier. But with the current price of ammo and components, I've reverted to elbow grease.

Bottom line? An ugly duckling that shoots pretty decent groups and functions quite reliably.
ChasHam is offline  
Old July 24, 2021, 12:29 PM   #23
Wharf Rat
Junior Member
 
Join Date: July 24, 2021
Posts: 2
My M9. Love it, love it, love it.
Wharf Rat is offline  
Old July 24, 2021, 02:48 PM   #24
101combatvet
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 25, 2011
Posts: 667
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metric View Post
How would you describe the evolution of Beretta's QC from the mid 1980's to the present?
Don't shoot 9mm ammunition specifically made for submachine guns, and you can avoid eating the slide.
__________________
Special Operations Combat Veteran
Gunsmith, BS, MFA, Competitive Shooter
NRA Certified Firearms Instructor [9 Certifications]
101combatvet is offline  
Old July 24, 2021, 05:07 PM   #25
tdrizzle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 11, 2007
Location: St Paul
Posts: 209
My 92 Centurion is a way more accurate than I am, and very light shooting.

I also had a G model decocker only put on, and added a 15 lb main spring for slightly easier DA trigger pulls. Doesn't seem to affect primer strikes, but I read not to go lighter either, for that reason.
tdrizzle is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.09972 seconds with 8 queries