March 13, 2018, 08:44 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2, 2012
Location: upstate New York
Posts: 90
|
Ruger 500 magnum
Ruger makes one of the strongest revolvers out there, why haven't they developed a 500 frame magnum?
|
March 13, 2018, 08:50 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 29, 2010
Location: Shoshoni Wyoming
Posts: 2,713
|
Wright them and ask.
|
March 13, 2018, 10:11 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 30, 2006
Posts: 308
|
Back to a kinder response.
Ruger already has revolvers chambered in 454 Casull and a very interesting .480 Ruger and I suspect they are currently waiting to see if the giant cartridges catch on. Ruger seems to be a very intelligent company following their customers wishes based on practicality and popularity. |
March 13, 2018, 01:06 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 20, 2009
Location: Helena, AL
Posts: 4,424
|
The 480 Ruger propels a 400gr Bullet @ 1200fps, which is more than I could handle. I'm with gnystrom, 500 is a niche round and Ruger wants it's name on those.
|
March 13, 2018, 03:21 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2012
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Posts: 1,752
|
The 500 magnum is S&W's baby.....the 480 Ruger is Rugers big bore baby .
It's the same reason S&W doesn't have a 480 Ruger ! The gun companies have been playing this cartridge name game since self contained ammo hit the market . |
March 13, 2018, 03:43 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 24, 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 768
|
I don't like the long cylinders of the 500 Magnum, but Ruger could give a shot to a .500" that would fit in the SRH cylinder, kinda like the 500 JRH but with properly reamed brass t accept the big heavies. I don't know that they would rip off the 500 JRH and put their own name on it, but they could (and SHOULD) come out with a 500 of their own that fits in regular sized revolvers, not monstrous clowns guns.
|
March 13, 2018, 05:25 PM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 20, 2014
Posts: 2,084
|
Quote:
|
|
March 14, 2018, 12:26 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2010
Posts: 271
|
Hamilton Bowen and other gunsmiths make SBH and RH
Capable of firing the .500 linebaugh. Granted, they are boutique firearms for a niche crowd.
__________________
S&W highway patrolman 28-2/ Springfield mil spec 1911 (semi custom)/ Sig P220 match elite .45 acp/Kimber micro 9 stainless/ Remington 870 tac14/ Taurus pt22/ S&W 629-1 3" .44 mag/ S&W 629 PC V-Comp/ Beretta M9/ Stevens/Savage 311A 12 ga double bbl/ Magnum research Desert Eagle XIX .44 mag/ S&W 460 xvr/ Glock g40 10mm longslide/ H&K usp compact .45 acp/ Ruger SuperBlackhawk Lipsey Edition/ S&W 686+ 3-5-7 talo edition |
March 14, 2018, 01:03 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
|
"...boutique firearms for a niche crowd..." So's the .500 S&W. Starts at roughly $40US per 20. The .480 Ruger isn't any better except from Hornady's $30 per 20.
The .500 has more factory options than the Ruger at Midway. Five loads for the Ruger. Thirty-two for the Smith. However, like gwpercle says, Ruger doesn't make a .500 because it's not a Ruger.
__________________
Spelling and grammar count! |
March 14, 2018, 02:56 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2017
Posts: 1,868
|
I think S&W should chamber a detective special for it! :-)
|
March 14, 2018, 03:31 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 7, 2008
Posts: 3,224
|
Since no one needs one, who would buy one? Are there enough people that would buy such an impractical firearm that it would be quite lucrative to make them? It's a gamble that would cost a lot of money and might not pay off. Who knows; they did make the Charger, but it's based upon the very well established 10-22 and uses inexpensive 22LR ammo. It was probably much less of an expensive gamble than what's being suggested here.
|
March 14, 2018, 04:02 PM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 8, 2015
Posts: 1,021
|
Quote:
This is correct. It’s why only Ruger is doing 327 mag (right now) and 480. It’s why only s&w does 460 and 500 and why they won’t do a smaller framed gun in 454. The manufacturers like to stake out their little caliber niche and then if you like that caliber you have to buy their product. You know when a caliber has “arrived” when multiple manufacturers start chambering for it. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
March 16, 2018, 06:12 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 21, 2013
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,695
|
I'll bet like others that Ruger kinda' took it on the chin with the lack of shooters big bore love from their 480 cartridge. No sense rubbing salt on open wounds by trying to gain big bore market share. The 500's are a small niche market. (strictly just my opinion)
__________________
"To be old an wise you must have been young and stupid" |
March 16, 2018, 07:01 PM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 11, 2014
Posts: 754
|
The 500 smith is a silly cartridge that needed a silly long revolver to handle it. I see no need for Ruger to accommodate it when a standard length 500 would do all one needs a handgun to do and it wouldn't need a wheeled carriage to maneuver it.
Quote:
|
|
March 16, 2018, 07:52 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 22, 2016
Posts: 3,887
|
Because .50 caliber revolvers, and handguns in general, aren't sensible. Unless you're an elephant hunter, there's nothing that a .454 or .460 won't do for you in the Western Hemisphere and do it for less.
Also, I think there's Ruger wanting to support the .480 as their biggest big bore revolver and not give their competitor S&W a boost with a .500 S&W Magnum chambered revolver. Also, IDK if the Ruger cast frames can handle the .500 Magnum. Not without them having to make an even larger frame and go from the Super Redhawk boat anchor to a small asteroid.
__________________
"We always think there's gonna be more time... then it runs out."
|
March 17, 2018, 12:37 AM | #16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
|
Quote:
My 12 y/o, 80 lb niece thought mine was fun to shoot when she had a chance to run full power 375s. The response from most other experienced shooters was "Oh, that's not bad, at all!" It is a niche round, though. Of course, I believe .500 S&W to have an even smaller niche. There just isn't a big enough market for Ruger to develope a Megahawk frame for the cartridge. (The Redhawk and Super Redhawk don't have large enough diameter cylinders.)
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. |
|
March 17, 2018, 07:39 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 7, 2016
Posts: 122
|
I would note that the Ruger Super Redhawk 454 Casull is already the most powerful 6-shot production revolver in the world. One could argue that it is already the most powerful and practical revolver available.
Smith & Wesson has demonstrated that there is niche for an even larger and more powerful 5 shot revolver, but I am not sure Ruger is giving up much by letting S&W have that market to themselves. How big is the market really for revolvers that are larger and less practical than the Super Redhawk? And if you made a 50 caliber round that fit in the Super Redhawk, could it do any job that the 480 Ruger could not?
__________________
My blog: http://straightshooterjake.blogspot.com/ |
March 18, 2018, 12:36 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 960
|
I have a 460 XVR and a Super Blackhawk in 480 and if I had bought the 480 first, I might have had a much harder time justifying the 460 purchase.
On the other hand, the 460 Magnum is a bad mammy jammy..... I was looking at the BFR in 500 JRH, but it's not really gonna do anything I can't do now. If you wanna Ruger in 500, just get the BFR as it's basically a big Blackhawk. |
March 18, 2018, 06:30 AM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 21, 2013
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,695
|
Quote:
__________________
"To be old an wise you must have been young and stupid" |
|
March 18, 2018, 10:53 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 960
|
^^^ That is huge and sweet. What kind of velocities do you get with that long barrel? I have the "normal" one, the XVR. The 460V is sweet as well.
I really like the 480 in the SBH. I like a 410g LBT about 1100 fps, if that don't kill it, it deserves to live. Oh yes, I love the big boomers too. |
March 19, 2018, 05:51 AM | #21 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 21, 2013
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,695
|
Quote:
__________________
"To be old an wise you must have been young and stupid" |
|
March 19, 2018, 07:26 AM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 26, 2018
Posts: 380
|
I fired a 4 inch barreled .500 once. MY ENTIRE HAND TINGLED AFTERWARDS. I put it down, much to the entertainment of the owner.
I was fine with his laughter. |
March 19, 2018, 08:56 AM | #23 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: November 26, 2016
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 960
|
Quote:
The 460 has the classic 45 style recoil impulse that is revered by so many 1911 shooters, just more of it. :-) I have a 400 grain hand load that's leaving my 8-3/8" XVR around 1680 that will wake you up and yet it's not an intense recoil that hurts like I hear about from so many 500 owners. And the 460 shoots 454 Casull like they are 22 magnums. But still, the gun is big and heavy and is nearly two POUNDS heavier than my 480 Ruger SBH which is heavy itself at about 50 ounces. (75 for the XVR) Quote:
|
||
March 19, 2018, 09:07 AM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 29, 2010
Location: Shoshoni Wyoming
Posts: 2,713
|
When I wrote "write them and ask" I was not being flippant.
Ruger actually listens to customers. Try them. If people call and ask for something enough times they will probably do it! |
March 20, 2018, 01:32 AM | #25 |
Member Emeritus
Join Date: August 19, 2004
Posts: 7,133
|
Not enough demand to repay R&D.
Seriously, that's it right there. Denis |
|
|