|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 25, 2017, 08:14 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 31, 2000
Location: Texas (By Way of Illinois)
Posts: 1,376
|
Remington RP9... A PPQ Knock Off?
I was just looking over an article and saw a pick of the new Remington RP9 pistol. Pardon me if this has already been covered here, but doesn't the slide look exactly like the PPQ? While I haven't seen the internals on this, it looks just like a PPQ M2 minues the finger grooves.
Anyone seen one of these to comment on similarities/differences with the PPQ? https://www.gunsamerica.com/blog/rem...hot-show-2017/
__________________
Midwestern Ramblings (my amateur firearms blog): http://martowski.wordpress.com/ |
January 25, 2017, 08:31 AM | #2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: January 24, 2017
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 5
|
Yeah that does look very similar. To some degree, they all have striking similarities. Everything after Beowulf is deravitive. Lol
Had to argue with someone the other day that no, the Sig P320 isn't a "Glock ripoff" just because it's black with a striker. But this is really similar. Really really.
__________________
Sig Sauer, Beretta, Walther, Remington, Browning, Smith and Wesson, Benelli, Saiga, Taurus, Mosin Nagant, others... |
January 25, 2017, 08:51 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 8, 2013
Posts: 339
|
One significant difference is that the PPQ actually functions reliably...
|
January 25, 2017, 09:32 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 28, 2002
Posts: 112
|
Egad, it really does resemble a 5" PPQ. I wonder how many product recalls the RP9 will have to go through.
|
January 25, 2017, 10:17 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 31, 2000
Location: Texas (By Way of Illinois)
Posts: 1,376
|
Yeah, I mean I know there's probably only so much originality you can put into a striker fired polymer design these days but geesh... this just seems like a blatant copy in many ways. Again, haven't seen the internals but the Remington even talks about it having a pre cocked striker that provides a single action pull... which sounds a lot like how my PPQ feels.
__________________
Midwestern Ramblings (my amateur firearms blog): http://martowski.wordpress.com/ |
January 25, 2017, 10:20 AM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
Quote:
I know that Remington's recent product introduction history certainly doesn't bode well, but I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt.
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak |
|
January 25, 2017, 11:13 AM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 8, 2013
Posts: 339
|
Quote:
I really want to see Remington produce a solid handgun as I've always been a fan of the company. Time will tell I guess. |
|
January 25, 2017, 12:14 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 11, 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 4,580
|
looks like a Umarex quality clone attempting to combine the M&P and PPQ.
Poor Remington. How the mighty have fallen.
__________________
Handguns: 2x Glock 19.4 | Glock 26.4 | HK USP 9 | HK P2000 | HK VP9 SK | HK P30 | CZ Shadow 2 | CZ P-10 C | CZ P-07 | CZP-01 | S&W 360PD Rifles: DDM4 | SGL 21 | SAM7K | Draco | PSA PDW SBR | ASA Side-Charger SBR | CZ Scorpion K SBR | Aero M4E1 9" 300blk SBR | Angstadt Jack9 SBR | Savage Mark II FV-SR Shotguns: Mossberg 590A1 20" SP | Mossberg Shockwave |
January 25, 2017, 12:47 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 29, 2011
Posts: 1,765
|
Doesn't look like a PPQ to me.
__________________
“When the people find that they can vote themselves money that will herald the end of the republic.” ― Benjamin Franklin |
January 25, 2017, 01:01 PM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: October 27, 2016
Posts: 20
|
It does seem a little bit like a knock off but what really bothers me is the logos on the grip and the slide. Just ugly.
|
January 25, 2017, 06:03 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 5, 2001
Location: NH
Posts: 343
|
It was actually designed by the guy that designed the S&W M&P. S&W was also the importer of Walther at that time. I'm sure he took ideas from both designs when he came up with the Remington.
__________________
"Quid Clarius Astris" |
January 25, 2017, 06:07 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 12,213
|
Meh. They're all polymer framed striker fired pistols. There's only so much originality you can have without going with something many people wouldn't like.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
January 25, 2017, 09:50 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 7,839
|
I really get tired of the glock and walther knockoff threads.
I've had to argue that the Ruger SR22 is not a Walter P22 copycat. the Canik TP9SF is not a walther PPQ knockoff(ealier TP9 variants most certainly were, but later gens have distinguished themselves as a whole new animal) The Ruger SR series is not a glock knockoff the springfield XD is not a glock wannabe the S&W M&P is not a glock wannabe(but perhaps it should be, the trigger design sucks IMO) the lists go on and on and on. I had a guy try and argue that the RP9 was a direct copycat of a glock. personally, I could care less if it is guilty of infringing on every walther patent in the book. the RP series need serious refinement and is a perfect testament to the shoddy quality of Remington handguns(coughR51coughcough). I picked one up in the LGS, the ergonomics were amazing but it is a seriously topheavy beast and it failed to return to battery after performing a presscheck. recoil spring felt light and weak to begin with, I can't imagine how poorly it would do once it actually had to strip a round from the magazine.
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar. I never said half the stuff people said I did-Albert Einstein You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin |
January 25, 2017, 10:47 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 31, 2000
Location: Texas (By Way of Illinois)
Posts: 1,376
|
Certainly there is only so much originality that can be built into the current polymer frame striker fired format at this time. However, it struck me even aesthetically just looking at the Remington slide that it's very much copying the PPQ's design. Kind of like when a clothes designer copies another one. There's only so many ways you can make a shoe, but it's apparent when there's intentionality around copying another design.
In the end what does the mean? Not a lot, but then a lot of what we all discuss is inconsequential in the grand scheme of things. Such is the case with casual casual dialogue
__________________
Midwestern Ramblings (my amateur firearms blog): http://martowski.wordpress.com/ |
January 26, 2017, 05:22 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2005
Location: AZ
Posts: 3,113
|
Yeah, it looks like a Sigma frame with a Walther slide, and an M&P style nose job.
I'm not bothered by it. That look is what's fashionable these days. If they can't make a pistol that works good, they might as well make it look like one that does . |
January 26, 2017, 11:54 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 27, 2000
Location: Somewhere in 14T NT
Posts: 730
|
Hmm, looks like my PPQ but my PPQ works every time and has the superior paddle magazine release lever as well. Sorry, but IMHO, the last original handgun design Remington came up with was in 1875!!
|
January 26, 2017, 01:49 PM | #17 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
Quote:
For those who haven't seen it, when MM says "many malfunctions," this means "dozens." The gun routinely misfed when >15rds were loaded in the magazine, with the top cartridge jamming between the feed ramp and feed lips, which pushed the barrel upwards into the slide with so much force that the slide was barely operable unless the mag was dropped first. THEN it started refusing to go into battery. Ugh! Quote:
OTOH the RP9 is certainly a "Me-Too" product, which makes the initial MAC test doubly vexing, as there are literally dozens of similar competitors that function properly out-of-the-box.
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak |
||
January 26, 2017, 02:08 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 24, 2013
Location: Michigan
Posts: 641
|
The slide looks a lot like the PPQ's for sure and the frame similar to the M&P's. Overall the RP9 is not as aesthetically pleasing as the other two to my eye. I don't see it as a big if someone says that a new gun resembles another or a combination of several. Aesthetics is one thing. Then there are things like ergonomics, accuracy, trigger characteristics, reliability, and shootability that matter more and can't be judged from a photo.
Manufactures can still be creative aesthetically wise. The current line of Steyr's or the Beretta's APX would be some recent stand outs. Even the 320 looks Sigish and unlike other striker models. Since I'm not a manufacturer with skin in the game. I say the more good options/choices the better. It drives innovation, improvements, and lowers cost for the user. |
January 26, 2017, 02:25 PM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 12,213
|
Quote:
While I have no love for modern Remington, it was a test of one pistol. It doesn't bode well for sure, but the big question is if we see similar reports. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
January 27, 2017, 12:17 AM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 27, 2000
Location: Somewhere in 14T NT
Posts: 730
|
Quote:
|
|
January 27, 2017, 12:25 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 7,839
|
the model 51 was very reliable from what I've heard. the R51 on the other hand is complete and utter junk.
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar. I never said half the stuff people said I did-Albert Einstein You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin |
January 27, 2017, 11:00 AM | #22 |
Member
Join Date: January 5, 2017
Posts: 67
|
I hate defending Remington, but guns are like movies at this point. It is difficult to design one without similarities to others. Many don't agree, but I still think HK's VP series looks like the Walther PPX.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|