|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 19, 2017, 07:22 PM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 6, 2009
Location: NorthWest Florida
Posts: 1,358
|
When you can remove a 1911 bushing with your fingers
either you have some very strong fingers, or it's time to replace the bushing and recoil spring
__________________
Marlin Specialist Calico Specialist A gun should be a tool in the hands of a deadly weapon, not a deadly weapon in the hands of a tool. |
September 19, 2017, 10:24 PM | #27 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,833
|
or...
When you CAN'T remove a 1911 bushing...
Grow stronger!!! or, you pistol is too tightly fitted... I know that today, there are pistols made that require a wrench, but if you can't remove the barrel bushing from a GI spec 1911A1 without resorting to a tool, there is something wrong, either with the gun, or with you...
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
September 21, 2017, 03:41 PM | #28 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 20, 2014
Location: Kinda near Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,254
|
Quote:
|
|
September 21, 2017, 04:49 PM | #29 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
Hi, bbqncigars and 1911_Hardball,
I won't deny that JMB was a great firearms designer, perhaps the best of the general gun designers. Others, like Garand, produced fine designs, but no one else had a record of successful designs of such a variety of arms, from vest pocket pistols to heavy machine guns. But I have long felt, (OK, had an obsession) about the JMB fans totally ignoring the role played by the Army boards in making what became the M1911 a better gun than it would have been if left to Browning alone. They are often dismissed as stupid dolts whose only role was to approve whatever "the Master" put before them. But Browning had never (as far as I know) fired a shot in anger and knew next to nothing about military tactics or the actual use of weapons in the field, let alone in combat. None, repeat none, of Browning's previous designs was made to be disassembled away from a workbench (the thought of "field disassembling" a Winchester Model 1886 is pretty frightening). It was just that sort of practical experience that was the contribution of the junior officers on the boards and made the 1911 a pioneer among the world's military pistols. Jim |
September 21, 2017, 04:58 PM | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 28, 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 11,756
|
Sorry that I am focusing on simply one small bit of your (fine!) post, but if you can honestly say that John Browning was "...perhaps the best of the general gun designers" then I would truly like to know who else you believe would round out the top five?
I'm just one guy that doesn't know much, but I can't imagine anyone comes close to what JMB accomplished in firearms design. Really, tell me who even approaches his accomplishments in firearms design?
__________________
Attention Brass rats and other reloaders: I really need .327 Federal Magnum brass, no lot size too small. Tell me what caliber you need and I'll see what I have to swap. PM me and we'll discuss. |
September 21, 2017, 05:24 PM | #31 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,833
|
I feel Browning truly deserves the title "genius", not just for the ingenuity of his designs, AND the number of them, but also for the way he did business.
And, by that I mean he gave the customer what they wanted. Browning wasn't a gunfighter, or a combat soldier, and based on what he did, he knew it. He wasn't the kind of man who claimed his designs were "perfection". If the customer (US Army) wanted changes, he made changes. Another aspect of his genius was that his designs were adaptable TO those changes. I agree, current "history" doesn't give those people who helped Browning turn his prototypes into the M1911 don't get the credit they deserve. They are "faceless" Army officers, unknown to history as individuals... The service history of the M1911 /1911A1 speaks for itself. No other combat pistol can match it. There is, however a Browning design that will surpass it, in military use, the M2 .50 caliber machine gun. In another half dozen years or so, it will pass the century mark in active service. In my opinion, if you were to choose one weapon that "won" WWII, its not the M1 Garand (though the Garand did have huge impact), and its not even the 1911A1 (which did a lot of keep individual troops alive) or the Atomic Bomb, it is the Browning .50 cal machine gun.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
September 22, 2017, 08:25 PM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 6, 2009
Location: NorthWest Florida
Posts: 1,358
|
Guilty as charged with the "too tightly fitted" bushing at the moment...
and a 24# spring...it'll work itself in over time
__________________
Marlin Specialist Calico Specialist A gun should be a tool in the hands of a deadly weapon, not a deadly weapon in the hands of a tool. |
September 22, 2017, 08:35 PM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 14, 2004
Location: NY State
Posts: 6,575
|
The 1911 was designed for the bottom edge of a magazine to be used as a bushing wrench. Need more ? Replace or stone the bushing !
The nicest take apart gun I can think of is a REVOLVER !! The French military 1873 . One screw. The end of the center pin is a screw driver .The ONE screw holds the handles together . There are cams to hold things like the mainspring . Without instruction the whole thing came apart extremely fast . For a black powder handgun this means that a thorough cleaning of corrosive powder residue is very easy !
__________________
And Watson , bring your revolver ! Last edited by mete; September 22, 2017 at 08:44 PM. |
September 22, 2017, 08:55 PM | #34 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,189
|
You can easily remove the barrel bushing of a military grade 1911 with your fingers. I was doing that when I was a teenager.
Quote:
|
|
September 23, 2017, 02:48 PM | #35 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 25, 2009
Location: SD
Posts: 198
|
Quote:
It's been many years since I came across it and have no idea to whom credit should go.
__________________
Shot placement is King, penetration is Queen. Everything else is faeries dancing on the heads of pins. |
|
September 25, 2017, 05:57 PM | #36 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 22, 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 3,623
|
Another interesting utility feature of the venerable 1911 as originally designed is that you can use a fired .45 ACP case for a lost recoil spring plug...and while I've never completely lost that high velocity cap when it escaped my greasy fingers during field stripping, I've come darn close. Rod
__________________
Cherish our flag, honor it, defend it in word and deed, or get the hell out. Our Bill of Rights has been paid for by heros in uniform and shall not be diluted by misguided governmental social experiments. We owe this to our children, anything less is cowardice. USAF FAC, 5th Spl Forces, Vietnam Vet '69-'73. |
September 25, 2017, 07:28 PM | #37 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
44 AMP wrote, "any man who can remove the safety BEFORE removing the mainspring housing is a better man that I."
It is pretty easy; I had no idea anyone would find it difficult. On JMB, "He wasn't the kind of man who claimed his designs were 'perfection' ". From some things I have read, that is exactly the kind of man he was. He fought every proposed change and idea that didn't come from him. Of course, he was good and darned well knew it, and like many people of genius, he was a proud man who did not suffer fools gladly. The military won their arguments by the power of the purse, even when their ideas resulted in a better product. As for firearms designers, many are quite rightly lauded for major contributions, but basically worked on one design. They include Garand, Kalashnikov, Stoner, Luger, Mauser, Colt*, etc. Others literally worked on dozens of designs; among them, in addition to Browning, include Mason, T.C. Johnson, Pedersen, Borchardt, Bergmann, Mannlicher, etc. *Colt really designed one gun, the basic Paterson; later percussion revolvers were improvements. Colt, of course, never played any role in the SAA and later guns. Jim |
September 25, 2017, 08:07 PM | #38 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 28, 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 11,756
|
Okay, from your second list of Gentlemen that worked on MANY designs...
Who's resume even approaches John Browning?
__________________
Attention Brass rats and other reloaders: I really need .327 Federal Magnum brass, no lot size too small. Tell me what caliber you need and I'll see what I have to swap. PM me and we'll discuss. |
|
|