|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 2, 2017, 09:20 PM | #76 | |
Junior member
Join Date: July 26, 2001
Location: midwest
Posts: 2,374
|
Quote:
|
|
February 3, 2017, 01:34 AM | #77 | ||
Staff
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,971
|
Quote:
Quote:
The plastic does soften somewhat (which is not the same as melting) at lower temps, but as long as the frame is under about 260 degrees F it should be strong enough to be fired without cooling it down first. If it's over 260 degrees F, it should be allowed to cool before firing. 260 degrees is well above the boiling point of water which is 212 degrees F. So as long as you're not getting a Glock frame up well over the boiling point of water, you can fire it (with gloves) without fear that it will be damaged. This video shows a dashboard getting up over 190 degrees F with the outside temperature of about 110 degrees F. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnpSABil6zg This study, performed in Iraq, suggests that temps can "approach" 212 degrees F (100 degrees C). https://www.researchgate.net/publica...tomobile_Cabin That is still not nearly hot enough to melt a Glock frame--or the frame of any other pistol made from a polymer similar to what Glock uses. In fact, it's not even hot enough to soften it to the point that it would be unsafe to use it. By the way, here is the 350+ page document that the military put out to explain what they were looking for and how to submit entries. https://www.fbo.gov/utils/view?id=6b...5fdbc3e97ee8e2 That doesn't include all the detailed specifications for the pistol. There are other documents that apparently aren't available for public download. The above document does state that the reliability of the handgun would be evaluated "in both extreme high temperature and extreme low temperature environments". One could assume that the military wrote several hundred pages specifying what kind of pistol they wanted but then forgot that they should have reminded the manufacturer that it shouldn't melt when left in a vehicle in the desert. But I don't think that would be the most reasonable assumption to make.
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
|
||
February 3, 2017, 07:15 AM | #78 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2016
Posts: 223
|
Likely because they wanted a MHS aka modular hand gun system. And SIG is the only one that is truly that.
SW nope Glock nope SIG yup the sn part is the trigger group which is swappable between the frames in different sizes and calibers. Truly a modular set up. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
February 3, 2017, 08:40 AM | #79 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 1, 2011
Location: Texas, land of Tex-Mex
Posts: 2,259
|
Its almost like they wrote rules for the firearm manufacturer they wanted. Thats never ever happened before in government...
|
February 21, 2017, 12:07 PM | #80 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 11, 2004
Location: Redwood City, Ca.
Posts: 4,114
|
This is an important part of the solicitation:
Quote:
On the other hand it did present any manufacturer who had some new ammo they wanted the Army to look at, a chance. Well something that resembled a chance anyway. Mostly it gave the military an opportunity to say that they gave manufacturers a chance. Someday we may learn exactly who, other than FN, submitted any guns in any other caliber than 9 and a few 40 S&Ws. tipoc |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|