The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Semi-automatic Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old February 2, 2017, 09:20 PM   #76
agtman
Junior member
 
Join Date: July 26, 2001
Location: midwest
Posts: 2,374
Quote:
Why did DoD reject the S&W M&P?
Because it wasn't a Glock?
agtman is offline  
Old February 3, 2017, 01:34 AM   #77
JohnKSa
Staff
 
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,971
Quote:
Because it wasn't a Glock?
Yeah, that's probably the reason. Probably also the reason that they rejected the Glock entry.
Quote:
If people have seen Glock frames melting then it must be true.
Maybe the car was on fire. A Glock frame should stand up to temps anywhere under 400 degrees F. It will not melt until it gets above 400 degrees F. The actual temperature limit is probably significantly higher than that, but that's a good safe number.

The plastic does soften somewhat (which is not the same as melting) at lower temps, but as long as the frame is under about 260 degrees F it should be strong enough to be fired without cooling it down first. If it's over 260 degrees F, it should be allowed to cool before firing.

260 degrees is well above the boiling point of water which is 212 degrees F. So as long as you're not getting a Glock frame up well over the boiling point of water, you can fire it (with gloves) without fear that it will be damaged.

This video shows a dashboard getting up over 190 degrees F with the outside temperature of about 110 degrees F.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnpSABil6zg

This study, performed in Iraq, suggests that temps can "approach" 212 degrees F (100 degrees C).

https://www.researchgate.net/publica...tomobile_Cabin

That is still not nearly hot enough to melt a Glock frame--or the frame of any other pistol made from a polymer similar to what Glock uses. In fact, it's not even hot enough to soften it to the point that it would be unsafe to use it.

By the way, here is the 350+ page document that the military put out to explain what they were looking for and how to submit entries.

https://www.fbo.gov/utils/view?id=6b...5fdbc3e97ee8e2

That doesn't include all the detailed specifications for the pistol. There are other documents that apparently aren't available for public download.

The above document does state that the reliability of the handgun would be evaluated "in both extreme high temperature and extreme low temperature environments". One could assume that the military wrote several hundred pages specifying what kind of pistol they wanted but then forgot that they should have reminded the manufacturer that it shouldn't melt when left in a vehicle in the desert. But I don't think that would be the most reasonable assumption to make.
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
JohnKSa is offline  
Old February 3, 2017, 07:15 AM   #78
Texas45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 20, 2016
Posts: 223
Likely because they wanted a MHS aka modular hand gun system. And SIG is the only one that is truly that.
SW nope
Glock nope
SIG yup the sn part is the trigger group which is swappable between the frames in different sizes and calibers.

Truly a modular set up.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Texas45 is offline  
Old February 3, 2017, 08:40 AM   #79
zincwarrior
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 1, 2011
Location: Texas, land of Tex-Mex
Posts: 2,259
Its almost like they wrote rules for the firearm manufacturer they wanted. Thats never ever happened before in government...
zincwarrior is offline  
Old February 21, 2017, 12:07 PM   #80
tipoc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 11, 2004
Location: Redwood City, Ca.
Posts: 4,114
This is an important part of the solicitation:

Quote:
The MHS procurement is intended to be an open caliber competition, which means the choice of caliber is left to the discretion of the
Offeror. Offerors are permitted to submit up to two (2) proposals configured to the specific caliber it chooses for evaluation. If an
Offeror chooses to submit two (2) proposals, their submissions must each be chambered in a different cartridge of the Offeror's
choosing. In addition, each proposal must be submitted independently from each other.
Ya gotta like how they left this bit up to the manufacturers. They could not decide on a caliber. At first it was that they wanted something that hit harder than a 9mm. This sparked a few years of gun store and internet discussion about what they were maybe gonna switch to. Smart bets were they would stay with the 9mm and ball ammo, which is what they ended doing.

On the other hand it did present any manufacturer who had some new ammo they wanted the Army to look at, a chance. Well something that resembled a chance anyway. Mostly it gave the military an opportunity to say that they gave manufacturers a chance.

Someday we may learn exactly who, other than FN, submitted any guns in any other caliber than 9 and a few 40 S&Ws.

tipoc
tipoc is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.05420 seconds with 8 queries