The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Hunt

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old July 28, 2014, 11:20 AM   #1
Unlicensed Dremel
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2014
Location: Flathead Valley, MT
Posts: 2,187
.22 Mag enough for big Canadian beavers?

You know, the kind that can weigh half again as much as a lower-48 coyote? (50, 60, 70 lbs). I've found myself in the past recommending .22 hornet / .218 Bee as an ethical minimum for yotes, so if it's half again as heavy of a critter, it seems at least that much gun is in order. But on the other hand, .22 mag intuitively seems enough for any beaver. Certainly it is with head shots, but what about vitals shots?

Last edited by Unlicensed Dremel; July 28, 2014 at 12:03 PM.
Unlicensed Dremel is offline  
Old July 28, 2014, 04:39 PM   #2
mete
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 14, 2004
Location: NY State
Posts: 6,575
Didn't they have in the " old days" a 300 lb beaver in Canada ??
Get yourself a 416 Rigby !
__________________
And Watson , bring your revolver !
mete is offline  
Old July 28, 2014, 05:19 PM   #3
Gunplummer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 2010
Location: South East Pa.
Posts: 3,364
I shot a lot of really big raccoons out of trees with body shots, and it usually knocked them back out of the tree.
Gunplummer is offline  
Old July 28, 2014, 05:39 PM   #4
Ruger480
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 23, 2013
Location: Central Iowa
Posts: 720
Quote:
it usually knocked them back out of the tree
So does that mean the 22 mag has "knock down" power?
Ruger480 is offline  
Old July 28, 2014, 05:57 PM   #5
WWWJD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 9, 2011
Location: Central KY
Posts: 552
Ditto; 22 mag has ended a few very large raccoons back on the farm with a shot in the vitals. Similarly sized critters.
__________________
~Mark

NRA Endowment FTW
WWWJD is offline  
Old July 28, 2014, 07:41 PM   #6
Mobuck
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
It would seem that beavers would be shot at much shorter ranges than the normal coyote shot. In nuisance control, I've shot beavers with the 17HMR and it works well w/o fur damage. With the right ammo the 17 is capable of head shots @100 yards which is better than I've seen with the 22 mags of the past.
A 22 mag should have more penetration than the 17 HMR so would be more suitable for body shots on large beaver.
Mobuck is offline  
Old July 28, 2014, 09:23 PM   #7
Unlicensed Dremel
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2014
Location: Flathead Valley, MT
Posts: 2,187
No, the big beavers I mention weigh 3 to 8 *times* what a raccoon weighs. 6 to 20 lbs, vs. 45 to 70 lbs. Apples & Cantaloupes.

.22lr is plenty for raccoon of any size. This is at least the difference between deer and elk (raccoon vs. beaver). I'm not talking about little southern beavers. They grow 'em BIG up north. They can live up to 24 years, and keep growing throughout their life, like fish. Body weight is the main determinant of how much gun is appropriate.

Google is your friend, mete!

Mobuck, I think you're right - beavers are always shot close, in the woods, where a head shot is easier (especially if they're swimming and the head is all you can see).

Last edited by Unlicensed Dremel; July 28, 2014 at 09:31 PM.
Unlicensed Dremel is offline  
Old July 29, 2014, 08:05 AM   #8
Gunplummer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 2010
Location: South East Pa.
Posts: 3,364
What is the difference? The heart is probably the same size on both. 20 pounds? I have skinned out a lot of coons in my time. I think you are confusing porcupines and raccoons, although I have seen some massive porcupines in my time.
Gunplummer is offline  
Old July 29, 2014, 11:13 AM   #9
kraigwy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,061
In my Alaska days I met a lot of trappers who would shoot muskrats with 22 shorts.

In the late spring, days got longer and you can set out in the twilight and fill your boat with muskrats.

Often they would get a shot at a beaver and had no problem using the 22 shorts.

They would shoot when they saw the critters swimming and you could only see the head. The shorts worked just fine.

The thing that would concern me is the 22 mag would leave two holes in the hide where most of the time the shorts only left one.

The more holes the less you get for the hide.
__________________
Kraig Stuart
CPT USAR Ret
USAMU Sniper School
Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071
kraigwy is offline  
Old July 29, 2014, 06:42 PM   #10
Blindstitch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 14, 2013
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 2,685
If 22 mag can take down a deer then it should work on beaver but not those 300 pound beavers. I think they call them bear.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castoroides
Blindstitch is offline  
Old July 30, 2014, 06:47 AM   #11
mete
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 14, 2004
Location: NY State
Posts: 6,575
http://jalopnik.com/evil-beaver-atte...ree-1612969216

Use more than a 22 short ! Thosw beavers are evil dangerous !!
__________________
And Watson , bring your revolver !
mete is offline  
Old July 30, 2014, 11:15 AM   #12
Panfisher
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 30, 2010
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,337
I would think that the .22 WMR would be enough, however the accuracy and crappy triggers in nearly every .22 Mag I have ever owned would create problems with bullet placement. Something like a .17 HMR with a nice scope and good trigger would work well. Since I have a .22 Hornet and its one of my favorite rifles I like it, but I wouldn't feel undergunned if I was shooting them with a .17HMR or .22 WMR. Does it need to be an "instant kill" so as not to lose them or is that a concern.
Panfisher is offline  
Old July 30, 2014, 11:26 AM   #13
JD0x0
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 30, 2013
Posts: 1,037
A 40 grain FMJ at just under 2000FPS should have no problem penetrating deeply enough to get the job done.
JD0x0 is offline  
Old July 30, 2014, 09:37 PM   #14
6.5swedeforelk
Member
 
Join Date: April 14, 2014
Location: N. Canada
Posts: 92
The 22 lr solid, not hollowpoint, works just fine for our huge beavers.

I did beaver control work for years, along with dam blasting.

Shooting them with shorts is another of those poor ideas where someone actually managed to kill one, but how many were lost?

Dremmel, they usually are not shot "in the woods", they are water animals & very cautious when on land.

Thirty beaver a day was quite good, the heaviest that I got was 80lbs and stretched out at 80 inches (l+w).

Only head shots, between eye & ear, or back of head, frontal slope can cause a glance-off. I have never heard of anyone taking body shots.
Why damage the pelt?

Last edited by 6.5swedeforelk; July 30, 2014 at 09:57 PM. Reason: soften language somewhat
6.5swedeforelk is offline  
Old July 31, 2014, 02:53 PM   #15
Longshot4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 22, 2014
Posts: 868
I have never shot a Beaver. Although If trapping at point blank or at 100+ yards I am a 22Hornet guy. You can reload with a non fragment bullet and med. vel. And count on a clean kill head shot. If you want to back off a bit use a 17 Hornet. Being remote would drive me to load my own with LilGun powder and # 6 1/2 rem primers. It's easy to load for. I like the Ruger 77 bolt it's light weight to carry. Let us know how your choice works out.
Longshot4 is offline  
Old August 1, 2014, 05:32 AM   #16
Geezerbiker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 20, 2011
Location: Willamina, OR
Posts: 1,908
Outta curiosity are this hunted only for the pelts? The reason I ask is on a certain Scandinavian cooking show I saw, they showed making stew from beaver meat...

They're protected here so no hunting them at all even if they're damaging your trees...

Tony
Geezerbiker is offline  
Old August 3, 2014, 01:10 AM   #17
6.5swedeforelk
Member
 
Join Date: April 14, 2014
Location: N. Canada
Posts: 92
Quote:
Outta curiosity are this hunted only for the pelts?
The reason I ask is on a certain Scandinavian cooking show I saw,
they showed making stew from beaver meat...
They're protected here so no hunting them at all even if they're damaging your trees...
Some families do eat beaver (we prefer elk).

The meat is excellent bait for marten, fisher, wolves etc.

There is nothing that will bring in a bear better than a ripe beaver.

The castors (scent glands) which weigh up to a quarter pound, are used in everything from perfume to tobacco enhancers.

Even the scaly tail covering is made into wallets & hats.

As far as "protecting" the beaver... they must be managed.

Your home state is making a big mistake!
6.5swedeforelk is offline  
Old August 3, 2014, 08:38 AM   #18
Gunplummer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 2010
Location: South East Pa.
Posts: 3,364
I agree with that. I used to bow hunt a place in Maryland that had a small dammed lake loaded with bank beaver. They finally allowed trapping there when the beaver were going over 100 yards from water and dropping trees into the wires along the road. I remember one year they drug off the picnic tables and dropped a couple purple martin houses. They jammed the stuff into little fingers and corners where the water reached in along the bank of the lake. I found it quite humorous, but the Maryland Game Commission did not. Hard working little buggers!
Gunplummer is offline  
Old August 3, 2014, 12:28 PM   #19
Unlicensed Dremel
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2014
Location: Flathead Valley, MT
Posts: 2,187
Quote:
What is the difference?
They're 3 to 8 TIMES the size of raccoons - that's the difference - as I said above. Not half again as big; not even 1.5 or 2 times the size.

Quote:
The heart is probably the same size on both.
No it's not. Not even close. Heart size correlates roughly to body size. Making the heart size 3 to 8 times as big.

Quote:
I have skinned out a lot of coons in my time. I think you are confusing porcupines and raccoons, although I have seen some massive porcupines in my time.
I'm not confusing anything. You are confusing porcupines with beavers. I was comparing raccoons and beavers (since someone brought up and alleged that coons are the same size - which they're not. I pointed out that they're 3 to 8 times as big - as I said above), not raccoons and porcupines.

Quote:
Thosw beavers are evil dangerous.
Indeed they are:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-injuries.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...th-attack.html

There are countless stories of serious injuries from beavers - they are not to be trifled with - and that's including the little one.

But I trust kraigwy who says .22 shorts / .22lr is enough (making .22 mag plenty enough), at least on head shots, since Alaskan beavers are the same size as Canadian - roughly. However, I still doubt that either is ideal ("enough") for a body shot for 60 pounder - that's two coyotes worth of animal with a lot of fat. But I guess that since you'll be shooting them in the water 9 times out of 10, you'll of necessity be taking head shots only, 9 times out of 10, which skews the "needed" round quite a bit (since heck, .22lr is enough to kill a cow with a head shot at close range, let alone a large rodent).

Last edited by Unlicensed Dremel; August 3, 2014 at 12:38 PM.
Unlicensed Dremel is offline  
Old August 4, 2014, 12:07 AM   #20
Geezerbiker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 20, 2011
Location: Willamina, OR
Posts: 1,908
I live in Oregon. The fish and game laws are only the tip of the iceberg for stupidity from the state capital...

Tony
Geezerbiker is offline  
Old August 5, 2014, 07:36 PM   #21
Jack O'Conner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 11, 2005
Location: Manatee County, Florida
Posts: 1,974
My experiences with the 22MAG as a rifle cartridge is limited to Winchester ammo featuring the 40 grain hollow tip bullet. This bullet hits like a little grenade causing much tissue damage. I'm certain that I could topple a deer with this rifle except for that act being illegal in Pennsylvania. I'm not an outlaw.

Jack
__________________
Fire up the grill! Deer hunting IS NOT catch and release.
Jack O'Conner is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.10464 seconds with 10 queries