|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 6, 2000, 08:02 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 27, 2000
Posts: 340
|
I saw a program on the Discovery Channel describing the training of US State Department Protection Team members. I thought one of their techniques was very interesting.
The trainee is hooded. He's placed in a rectangular room with curtains on all sides. He is within a box painted on the floor, and the goal is to defend that box from attackers. The trainee is armed with a handgun loaded with Simunitions. Loud Indonesian music (lots of cymbals crashing) is played on a boom box while the 'attackers' set up, preventing the hooded trainee from hearing them and anticipating the attack. The hood has a cord attached to the top that goes to a pulley on the ceiling. When the scenario is ready to start, the music is turned off and the hood is yanked off the trainee's head by jerking on the cord. The attack begins. The attacker(s) may be a single person or a group, armed or not. They may be right in the trainee's face when the hood comes off, or the room may be empty and attackers suddenly run out from behind the curtains. There may be people milling around the room, mumbling incoherently, and they suddenly turn, draw weapons and attack. Or, there may be people waving protest signs that rush the trainee and pull the signs off of quarterstaffs they were taped to, and attack him with the staffs. A screaming, aggressive man may approach from the front to distrct the trainee, and then a group of attackers rushes out from behind the curtain behind him. The variety of possible secnarios is endless. Obviously, the goal is to teach the trainee to deal with sudden, unexpected attacks from any direction, in any number, with any weapons, forcing him to choose his defense method for each attacker, use weapon retention methods to maintain control of his own weapon, and make instant shoot/don't shoot decisions. This method could be adopted to any number of training regimens, either martial arts, firearms, or both. It definitely promotes flexible tactical thinking and situational awareness. |
December 8, 2000, 07:36 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 19, 1998
Posts: 986
|
Why turn the music off?
Sounds like a hoot, but frightening at the same time. |
December 9, 2000, 09:19 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 23, 2000
Location: MN
Posts: 1,388
|
umm...wouldn't the bad guys always win? I mean if it were me I would stand behind the guy wearing the hood and shoot him in the back.
|
December 9, 2000, 11:55 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 13, 2000
Posts: 216
|
Finding enough people to make this worth doing might be difficult. You have a shooter, a person to pull the hood (although he could be replaced by a mechanical device), and at least 2 "perps" for target practice. Obviously you'd need more people for more realistic practice scenarios (bystanders, hostages, etc).
And in KKKalifornia, 2 or more people practicing "paramilitary" skills equals a criminal conspiracy and felony charges (bastards). I'm sure other states have similar "antimilita" laws. |
December 10, 2000, 08:32 PM | #5 |
Staff Alumnus
Join Date: May 2, 1999
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 3,611
|
Hopefully the State folks have updated their training program. Ten years ago it was pretty horrible - friend went through it and reported that it was reprocessed crap.
Giz |
December 15, 2000, 10:14 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 27, 2000
Posts: 340
|
Responses
Cheapo:
You could leave the music on or off. The more you vary the scenario, the better. ============================================================ Glamdring: The goal is to train the student to respond to a variety of situations, not for the instructor to 'win' every time. Presenting a student only with a no-win situation isn't very good training. ============================================================ nbk2000: The law you're referring to is quoted below. Training citizens to use a pistol to deal with deadly assaults from multiple attackers in not paramilitary training and is perfectly legal. This kind of training would be good for a shooting club, where getting a bunch of people together would be much easier. You and your buddies could also form your own 'neighborhood watch' organization. The local cops would actually *help* you. This would be a great front to divert suspicion and scrutiny from your activites. It would give you legitimacy, a reason to train together, and even a valid excuse for you and your buds roaming your neighborhood at night. You'd just have to do your other training on private land, and set it up like a three-gun match or something legal like that. Use hunting camoflauge suits instead of mil surplus, and leave them and the web gear for unarmed 'backpacking' trips. If you use your head, it's not difficult to bypass the rules safely. Quote:
Gizmo99: Your friend is probably referring to the self-protection course that State gives it's diplodorks and staffers to make them feel safer. That has nothing to do with the training of the State Dept. Protection Teams, which appeared in the program to be more comprehensive and professional than SWAT team training I've observed before. |
|
December 15, 2000, 10:37 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 23, 2000
Location: MN
Posts: 1,388
|
But being on a protective detail solo is a lose-lose situation IMHO. I understand that this is just a single exercise in their training but still think force on force training would be better.
|
December 16, 2000, 07:30 AM | #8 |
Staff Alumnus
Join Date: May 2, 1999
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 3,611
|
Ought Six - that was a booby trapped comment I made - your flat on target with your analysis. The bud was a military officer going to an attache job.
I don't have any opinion of the training you describe. Sounds interesting, but from a non-participant, hard to assess it's worth. How do these SD types mesh with the USMC guards? Supplements? Point protection/body guards? Giz |
December 19, 2000, 11:42 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 27, 2000
Posts: 340
|
Gizmo99:
The SD Protection Teams are mainly for mobile security and motorcade defense when diplomats are out and about in foreign countries. They are based in the USA, travel with the Sec of State and others, and bring their own 'war wagon' modified Chevy Suburbans to protect the diplomat's limo. The Marines guard the various embassy compounds, and are stationed at those embassies full time. ============================================================ Glamdring: The key word is protection *team*. They don't travel solo, a group of four was the smallest element I saw deployed when they showed them at work. However, with a four-man team, they are spaced in a protective perimeter facing outward in four directions, and each man is individually responsible for immediate threats coming from his sector. Thus, the individual quick-reaction training is valuable as other team memebers are busy covering their own sector. |
December 20, 2000, 02:37 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 15, 2000
Location: Sugar Land, Tx
Posts: 1,507
|
I saw the same thing awhile back...Thought it was great training. I was very impressed with the video'ed agent's weapon retention techniques (both with handgun and MP5) and I ain't no slouch. .06-Thanks for posting that law. It is chilling. The more I learn about Kalifornia, the more frightened I get. Unbelievable.
|
December 22, 2000, 01:33 PM | #11 |
Junior Member
Join Date: December 22, 2000
Posts: 1
|
Duane Dieter was mentioned in the show.
Duane DIeter was mentioned in the show.
Anyone know if he has a website? |
|
|