October 6, 2017, 09:35 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: December 27, 2015
Posts: 72
|
New toys
Wanted a new semi auto .22 for some cheap shooting. Liked the Ruger SR22 and the M&P22. Bought both and they are excellent. I like the M&P just slightly better. Mainly because of the bigger gun feel. Anyone else tried these? Accuracy is very good with both.
|
October 6, 2017, 09:51 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 1, 2009
Location: Stillwater, OKlahoma
Posts: 8,638
|
Wow, the perfect answer to,,,
Wow, the perfect answer to,,,
Which pistol should I buy. Buy 'em both! Aarond .
__________________
Never ever give an enemy the advantage of a verbal threat. Caje: The coward dies a thousand times, the brave only once. Kirby: That's about all it takes, ain't it? Aarond is good,,, Aarond is wise,,, Always trust Aarond! (most of the time) |
October 6, 2017, 01:21 PM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2002
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 5,313
|
Quote:
(Stick around Kramden, you're a good influence.) |
|
October 6, 2017, 10:25 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 31, 2000
Location: Texas (By Way of Illinois)
Posts: 1,376
|
I believe he already bought both (?), at least that's how I read his post.
That said, I've never owned either one but spent some time recently looking at them. The M&P looked like the higher quality firearm.
__________________
Midwestern Ramblings (my amateur firearms blog): http://martowski.wordpress.com/ |
October 6, 2017, 11:17 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 13, 2014
Location: Tonica, IL
Posts: 473
|
I love my M&P 22 Compact. Closest thing I've found to a "trainer" for the Shield I carry, but I mainly have it for introducing new or inexperienced shooters to handgun shooting and it is great for that. I really like the fact that the manual of arms is pretty close to the other firearms I own. The accuracy isn't quite as good as my father-in-law's Mark II, but I didn't buy it expecting a bullseye pistol and it is plenty accurate for my purposes.
|
October 7, 2017, 07:32 AM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: December 27, 2015
Posts: 72
|
Whats nice is my wife likes to shoot them . She has a Shield for everyday protection but she can practice with the M&P22 and have less recoil and expense. Best of both worlds.
|
October 7, 2017, 07:33 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: December 27, 2015
Posts: 72
|
Yes I did. Liked them both.
|
October 7, 2017, 07:38 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 31, 2000
Location: Texas (By Way of Illinois)
Posts: 1,376
|
Kramden, do you find one to be "smoother" and better finished? When I looked, the S&W seemed to fit that bill. Just curious.
__________________
Midwestern Ramblings (my amateur firearms blog): http://martowski.wordpress.com/ |
October 7, 2017, 03:59 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 14, 2015
Posts: 116
|
My first 22 was a Walther P22...... Big mistake. Sold it for what I paid. I decided to go cheap and bought a Sig Mosquito, I know, probably another mistake but I haven't shot it yet so we'll see. If I have to give up on this one I will spring for the S&W or Ruger. Not interested in a target style pistol.
__________________
EAA SAR k2p 9mm Beretta px4 storm Taurus pt111 g2 9mm Sig Mosquito 22lr Sig Sauer P250 9mm full size Walther PPS m2 9mm S&W Bodyguard 380 Ruger LCP 380 |
October 8, 2017, 01:38 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 1, 2013
Location: Now relocated to Texas
Posts: 2,943
|
The Smith M&P .22 Compact is one of my favorite new style rimfires, however if you look at the full spectrum my early fifties Llama .22, Star F 110 and Walther PP .22 are all around neat shooters. A S&W Kit gun is about as versitle a .22 revolver as you can find, much of the accuracy and adjustable sights of the K.22 are there for your pleasure.
|
October 11, 2017, 08:32 AM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: December 27, 2015
Posts: 72
|
I agree the M&P is abit better finished. If I had to pick only one it would be the M&P.
|
October 11, 2017, 11:53 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 3, 2011
Posts: 208
|
I love my SR22. It will eat anything which is one of the big reasons I bought it.
__________________
"If you wear flip flops you got more problems than I can take care of in this video." Jeff Quinn |
October 11, 2017, 07:48 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 15, 2016
Location: Rural PA
Posts: 1,639
|
DanPop, could you elaborate on how your p22 was "a big mistake"?
__________________
22lr, 20 gauge, 8mm Mauser, 35 Remington, 30-06, 5.56x45/223, 9mm, 380acp |
October 12, 2017, 01:01 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 13, 2014
Location: Tonica, IL
Posts: 473
|
Not DanPop, but I've heard of people having problems with them being very ammo picky or having cycling issues. I ended up spending the extra for an M&P 22 just based on the slightly better reputation.
|
October 12, 2017, 11:59 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 15, 2016
Location: Rural PA
Posts: 1,639
|
Thanks Big. I was curious. One day, I'll be shopping for one of them. They're just not high on the list right now.
__________________
22lr, 20 gauge, 8mm Mauser, 35 Remington, 30-06, 5.56x45/223, 9mm, 380acp |
October 13, 2017, 06:00 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 11, 2016
Posts: 1,089
|
I found them both to be pretty good little pistols. I eventually got a Walther PPQ .22 because I wanted something representative of a full-size semiauto. It got me hooked on Walther and now I have a Q5 Match to go with it
When I train, I'll usually run 100 through the .22. It's almost as accurate as the Match, and it's a much cheaper way to practice things like quickly coming up on target and engaging. I'll do 50 through the Q5 to practice things where recoil makes a difference, like double-taps or quick target transitions. It's a very effective combo. I can definitely see where the M&P combo (.22 compact and Shield) would be similar. I really liked the .22 Compact, I just wanted something larger. |
|
|