|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 22, 2010, 02:12 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 22, 2007
Posts: 1,996
|
Scope choices for my Ishapore Enfield
I recently picked up an S&K scope mount for my Ishy enfield in .308. I'm waffling about what scope to mount on it. The rifle's main task will be punching paper out to 300 yards. I'm thinking of the following scopes:
- Mueller Hybrid 3-9x40 - Redfield Revolution 3-9x40 - Sightron si 3-9x40 I'm sure there are some opinions on these choices out there...lets hear them. Also, what other scopes have I overlooked in the $100-150 range? |
September 22, 2010, 02:19 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 7, 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 333
|
Any of them would do...
But I would not scope the rifle at all unless I was going to make a clone sniper verse of the Enfield that Holland and Holland built. Of course I am prone to putting a $100 saddle on a $5 mule. |
September 22, 2010, 04:56 AM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 22, 2007
Posts: 1,996
|
Quote:
|
|
September 22, 2010, 06:37 AM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: September 15, 2010
Location: Missouri
Posts: 66
|
The Mueller or Sightron.
|
September 22, 2010, 07:34 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 11, 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,198
|
In that price range, there are plenty of decent scopes to choose from. What I'd do is go down to the local pawn and gun store and look around. They have a section with just used scopes.
Glad to see someone else has one of these. I have a 2A and I think they're sweet. I just took mine in to Peterson's to have the Laquer stripped off and I'm going to have it blued or parkerized. Maybe duracoated. The gunsmith gave me a bit of a hard time about spending money on an indian gun. I only paid $180 for it. Oh well, last gunshow io went to had some beat-upo ones for $355 each!! How long have you had yours? Good luck with the scope and all.
__________________
"An angry prophet, denouncing the hypocrisies of our time" |
September 22, 2010, 09:10 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
|
FWIW i had a 3~9X40 on a #4 Enfield it seemed "bulky & klutzy" to me so I went down to a 2~8X32 & it was MUCH more suitable & I frankly never noticed the loss of the 1X in magnification.
Check out the Leupold, Burris & Nikon Monarch in the slightly lower power/smaller glass & see what you think. 3~9X40 Burris FF2 2~8x32 Nikon. for size comparison a classic the Weaver K-4 scope. I know it doesnt look like a huge difference, but handling, balance & overall "feel" were much close to the 4X Weaver with the 2~8 than with the 3~9 even though both are good scopes I'd go with the smaller versions every time now I've done a side-by-side comparison. |
September 22, 2010, 12:40 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 7, 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 333
|
Nice little package there sir
|
September 22, 2010, 09:39 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 22, 2007
Posts: 1,996
|
wogpotter, thanks for the pics. They have made me reconsider my scope choice. The smaller objective is much more proportional.
Quote:
Last edited by wnycollector; September 22, 2010 at 09:48 PM. |
|
|
|