The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Gear and Accessories

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 6, 2010, 10:17 PM   #1
Regolith
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 30, 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 400
Weaver Classic V-Series Rifle Scope 1-3x 20mm

Anyone have any experience with one of these?

I want to put a compact scope on my Mini-14 without paying a whole lot, and wanted to know if anyone has had any experience with them.

Last edited by Regolith; May 6, 2010 at 10:18 PM. Reason: title fix
Regolith is offline  
Old May 6, 2010, 10:21 PM   #2
draggon
Member
 
Join Date: April 16, 2009
Posts: 96
Got one on a 45-70 Ruger No.1. Good eye relief, satisfactory optics and not broken yet after about 100 max loads and lots of milder loads.
draggon is offline  
Old May 15, 2010, 09:37 PM   #3
dwwhite
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 9, 2008
Location: Southwest Tx
Posts: 187
I had one on a .45-70 as well, though mine was a Marlin 1895. I also had several hundred rounds of STOUT loads through the gun and never had a single problem.

If I had a Ranch Rifle instead of a standard Mini, I'd have kept the scope when I sold the Marlin, but alas, no easy, solid mounts for the older Mini's.

The only thing, don't expect the light gathering capabilties of a 50mm scope with this thing. It's a great little scope, and if you've read the reviews on the Midway site, I think a lot of people agree, it's just not built for precision shooting at long ranges in low light.

That said, if you take a 20mm lens, divide by 3 power, you still have an exit pupil of 6-7 mm, this is about as big as the pupil of your eye is going to get, even in low light, so even discounting some light loss through the lens, you've still got just about as much light as your eye can handle, even at the highest power.
dwwhite is offline  
Old May 15, 2010, 09:42 PM   #4
Regolith
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 30, 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 400
Quote:
it's just not built for precision shooting at long ranges in low light.
Neither is the Mini.

Thanks for the reviews; they help confirm what I was seeing on Midway.
Regolith is offline  
Old May 16, 2010, 08:45 PM   #5
griz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 31, 2000
Location: Middle Peninsula, VA
Posts: 1,588
I have one mounted on a Savage 12/223 combo gun. It's seen maybe a few dozen 3 inch mags (mostly turkey loads) and several hundred 223 rounds and the zero has never drifted. I'm happy with it and it strikes me as perfect for a Mini.
griz is offline  
Old May 17, 2010, 06:12 AM   #6
lmccrock
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 23, 2007
Location: Red Rock. TX
Posts: 820
Never used one, but they are popular as a beginning scope for 3-gun competitions on 223 rifles.

Lee
lmccrock is offline  
Old May 22, 2010, 03:25 AM   #7
bamaranger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 9, 2009
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 8,308
No weaver but.......

I put a Leu 1-4, bought used from ebay, on my Mini-30. I don't know what Weavers policy is, or the price of a new weaver, but I figure the Leu was a bargain and lifetime speedy repair.

The mini's have a rep as scope eaters, that bolt and op rod running back and forth I guess. My mini-30 has destructed several bushnells and a Tasco.
bamaranger is offline  
Old May 22, 2010, 03:28 AM   #8
bamaranger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 9, 2009
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 8,308
same same

I just looked at your OP and the add, and that's about what I paid for the used Leu. I rather have the USA Leu used, than the import weaver.

Leu will upgrade the reticule to your choosing for about $55 bucks down the road later if you want, also.
bamaranger is offline  
Old May 22, 2010, 09:52 AM   #9
dksac2
Member
 
Join Date: May 17, 2010
Posts: 62
For the money, the Weaver scopes are pretty decent.
I have several older Weavers sitting in a box.
The other day I pulled them out and looked at them.
Not bad optics for old scopes.
Weaver has made thousands of scopes and many of us grew up with a weaver on our rifles.
Should hold up on your mini just fine.
Put a 45 auto type recoil buffer on the spring righ up against the receiver. It helps cut down on shock by the OP rod.
Some people also put buffers over the gas piston to lessen shock when the op rod makes contact with the gas block.
I don't care for them as they sometimes stop the rifle from going into battery.
Shaving them to about half width is popular, but I still won't use them.
I want my Mini to be 100% reliable (thats why I bought a mini. not an AR:barf, so I don't use a front buffer. The rear buffer has never caused a problem.

Best Regards, John K
dksac2 is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.05862 seconds with 10 queries