|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 3, 2013, 01:05 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: August 21, 2013
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 78
|
First time shooting a revolver
Went to the gun range, with my semi that I bought two days earlier.
Decided to rent a revolver, a S&W 386, however I decided to shoot 38 Special rounds. I liked the feel of the revolver, sturdy, the grips could be better, but here's the big problem .... the damn gun didn't fire all the rounds ?!?!?! Yes it managed to misfire three times .. I thought to myself, fine maybe since it's the first time shooting a revolver I counted the rounds wrong (yeah fat chance of that) .. but when unloading the rounds .. yup ... one fresh non fired round .. this happened three times I reused the non fired rounds ... so they all fired eventually Remarks ? Comments ? ... Bad ammo ... or ... a worn out gun not properly maintained at the range Reason it really bothers me is because when I was looking for a gun I was thinking either a reliable 45 ACP or a 357 revolver |
September 3, 2013, 03:19 AM | #2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 3, 2012
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 449
|
Quote:
|
|
September 3, 2013, 05:00 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 24, 2006
Posts: 1,903
|
While I carry a semi auto and primarily own semi autos I have a few revolvers. All of my revolvers have been reliable shooters. A range gun could have a weak spring, or most likely you had some bad ammo. My wife has a Ruger SP101 .357 and loves it. She shoots .38 special +P primarily and has never had an issue one.
|
September 3, 2013, 06:40 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 12, 2006
Location: NKY
Posts: 12,463
|
That sounds like a worn out range gun. If you buy a reliable revolver, Smith or Ruger for example, you'll get a revolver that fires every time.
Don't discount them due to one bad experience. Generally speaking, a revolver is going to be equal to, or better than the mos reliable auto.
__________________
"He who laughs last, laughs dead." Homer Simpson |
September 3, 2013, 06:47 AM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 8, 2013
Location: Rittman, Ohio
Posts: 2,074
|
Quote:
One or the other. Revolvers are typically everh bit as reliable as your semi-auto. |
|
September 3, 2013, 09:23 AM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 30, 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,952
|
Quote:
|
|
September 3, 2013, 09:29 AM | #7 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
It takes a lot of shooting to wear out that gun; I suspect a dirty gun or maybe even something broken. Believe me, that is unusual for any good quality revolver.
Jim |
September 3, 2013, 03:14 PM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: August 21, 2013
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 78
|
That's what I thought as well, in fact I expected a revolver to be more reliable than a semi auto pistol
|
September 3, 2013, 03:44 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 20, 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 10,446
|
I see three possible reasons for the issue. The most likely is that the strain screw was backed out too far. This is probably the most common cause of light strikes on a S&W revolver because it's something that amateur gunsmiths can't help but tinker with. You see, there is a screw on the bottom front of the gripframe that should be bottomed out in order to keep proper tension on the hammer spring (it may have been covered by the grips on your rental gun). Too often, people mistake this for a "trigger pull adjustment screw" and try to back it out in order to lighten the trigger pull only to cause light strikes.
The second most likely cause is the ammunition. If you were shooting reloads or "remanufactured" ammunition (both of which are commonly sold by ranges) then this would be a likely cause. If whoever loaded the ammunition did not get the primers seated completely, then they will be pushed forward by the firing pin which may reduce the crushing force on them enough to cause a misfire. When a cartridge misfires on the first attempt but goes bang reliably on the second strike, that's an indicator that the primers weren't seated deeply enough. The final, and least likely, possible explanation is that the gun has a short firing pin. S&W revolvers with scandium-alloy frames (which the 386 has) are known to sometimes have light strike issues because they are fitted with shorter firing pins that steel-frame models. S&W does this to ensure that they won't have issues passing California's rather ridiculous drop test so that these models can be sold in that state. I have heard that if a scandium-frame revolver has issues with light strikes and is returned to S&W for repair, they will install the longer standard-length firing pin for non-CA residents. |
September 3, 2013, 09:24 PM | #10 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
I suppose anything is possible Cuckooland, but that firing pin is very small and light; it is hard to conceive of any test where it could be made to fire a gun by inertia.
Jim |
September 4, 2013, 05:00 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 20, 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 10,446
|
Quote:
Like you, I have a difficult time imagining that the primer could be detonated by inertia, but I've seen the issue referenced on several forums including this one in the past. |
|
|
|