|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 22, 2015, 12:02 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 10, 2011
Location: Leesville SC
Posts: 2,652
|
Is a .454 RB enough for deer?
I'm not sure if this will go well here instead of the hunt. But is a .454 RB enough for deer at close range. Say 40 yards or less. Bow hunting range. Will it do enough damage to leave a good blood trail? We will have a couple short range stands this coming season, and it will be awefully hard not to skin the Remington if one is close enough.
__________________
"I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery." - Thomas Jefferson |
January 22, 2015, 12:29 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 13, 2013
Posts: 173
|
I've heard the Colt Walker could drop a deer, but there was no information about the powder charge or the ranges involved. Someone with more experience can give you more information,but I'd be willing to bet that a full charge at a short distance could do the job. Not will, but could.
|
January 22, 2015, 12:59 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 7, 2008
Location: pa.
Posts: 2,450
|
you shoot that .454 RB thru both lungs it will kill the deer, deader than a door nail. i have killed deer with a .440 RB thru the lungs, as a matter of fact it killed them very quickly. eastbank.
|
January 22, 2015, 01:12 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 10, 2011
Location: Leesville SC
Posts: 2,652
|
Thanks guys for the replies, I was just thinking that my revolver may not be able to push that ball fast enough to do it ethically. But I certainly will try it.
|
January 22, 2015, 02:14 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 7, 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,246
|
Check these videos out (one of six):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WNYGs2_UZw He also has one in which he shoots a Colt Army with various projectiles and standard Goex. If you use Swiss, Olde Eynsford by Goex, or Triple 7 you can achieve some fairly powerful loads. If you use most any other powder you'll be pushing it to get 300 ft/lbs with it. But then a patched ball from a rifle kills deer just fine and often giving a complete passthrough at 100 yds or so, and it has about 300-400 ft/lbs at that point. I'd prefer a bullet for hunting though, and one with a wide meplat. It's why I had this made: http://accuratemolds.com/bullet_deta...=45-195C-D.png Note that at 195 grns it's only as long as a ball (.460") and has a very wide meplat. You can still get a full charge of powder behind it, and using Mr. Beliveau's testing in the ROA and using Triple 7 I'd imagine I can easily get 500 ft/lbs with it. But I found my accurate load is 35 grns in my Ruger and 30 grns in my Pietta Remington '58. I use 3F Triple 7 or Olde Eynsford powders and they both hit the same POI with the same favored charge and give the same size groups. The Pietta frame had to be modified to load these bullets though. The Walker was designed to kill a horse at 100 yds. It will certainly kill a deer at close range with that small rifle charge. There's a fellow who hog hunts with his Walker and uses 2F Triple 7 with a ball. His friends, including Kaido, use Kaido's bullets (modified Lee 255 grn .45 Colt bullets). The Walker fellow claims a greater wound by the ball within 25 yds. |
January 22, 2015, 03:58 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 30, 2010
Posts: 1,635
|
Quote:
I believe this myth started from the fact that these kinds of pistols were known as "horse pistols", which meant they were meant to be carried on a horse using saddle holsters. The name "horse pistol" is no more indicative of the intended target than the name "belt pistol" or "pocket pistol" is. Having read the correspondence, it's my opinion that Colt's intention was simply to produce a cavalry arm on par in performance with the existing musket cavalry arm it was to replace. There is, however, a record of a Mexican soldier being shot off of a horse at 100 yards. And I do not doubt this. I can hit a man-sized target off-hand with a single hand with my Uberti Walker at 110 yards. That said, I have no doubt that the Walker, with it's maximum load of 60 grains, is quite capable of killing a deer, or a horse. It's muzzle energy was not matched by another handgun until the advent of the .357 magnum. You can easily approach 500 ft-lbs of energy. Steve |
|
January 22, 2015, 04:20 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 7, 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,246
|
Looking at sources seemingly reliable most do not mention the design for use against horses as well, though I did find one so far.
http://firearmshistory.blogspot.com/...t-dragoon.html I guess I've accepted it as such because it's been said all too often. |
January 22, 2015, 04:44 PM | #8 |
Junior member
Join Date: April 22, 2014
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,549
|
Check your states hunting regulations first. Some states have energy requirements and ball size requirements. Some like my silly state just publish statements that blackpowder revolvers may be used for hunting of small game and forest grouse and completely forget that walkers and dragoons ever existed.
|
January 22, 2015, 06:44 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 16, 2013
Location: Eastern NC
Posts: 3,047
|
It wouldn't be legal here, and I don't think I'd use it if it were
Too much risk of killing the deer, but not quickly enough to find it, since I'm doubting you'll get a blood trail
__________________
One shot, one kill |
January 22, 2015, 07:47 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 7, 2010
Posts: 330
|
Doesn't look to be legal in Idaho. Yesterday, out of curiosity, I loaded 40 gr. equivalent Pyrodex (27.5 weighed) with Speer round balls (.457-in., 143.3 gr.)and CCI #11's and shot six thru my chronograph. Six shot avg. was 1060 fps which yields @357 ft/lb energy. About 38+p or low 9mm figures. Of course the bullet makes a 45 cal hole going in, so not exactly apples/apples in actual killing effectiveness. I'd get close. I know one thing, I would NOT want to be on the receiving end.
__________________
"I should have picked alcohol, drugs, or beating my wife..." Pete Rose Last edited by Idaho Spud; January 22, 2015 at 07:50 PM. Reason: typo |
January 22, 2015, 08:15 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 25, 2012
Location: Eaton Rapids, MI
Posts: 445
|
I live in Michigan and am here to tell you I have taken many deer with a Colt Walker. In fact, I took two doe's at the same time with one. A group of six came in at around 50 yards away. I pulled my pistol, aimed and dropped the first one. The rest stood around wondering what happened so I cocked it again and dropped the second one before the remaining four ran off. I have also taken many a deer in a standing corn field with a black powder pistol. up close and personal! I now prefer my ROA.
I also know that Steve is hung up on the fact that there is no documentation proving that the Colt Walker was designed for killing horses. At the same time he loves them and shoots them regularly. It is my personal belief documentation or not, the Walker was indeed designed to kill horses. I believe Walker wanted a pistol to shoot the horses out from underneath the Indians. If you get them on the ground, they are not riding all around you slinging arrows at you. Why on earth would Walker want such a powerful pistol simply to shoot Indians and not horses? I am also here to tell you, that I can shoot a 6 inch group at a hundred yards with a Colt Walker. I have done it many times, using a rest of course. To answer the question, is a .454 ball big enough to kill a deer? Absolutely. Just my 2 cents, Birch
__________________
Black Powder: Not because it is easy, but because it is hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win... |
January 22, 2015, 08:28 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,876
|
In regards to you Shawn. Best to have all 6 loaded and ready to light up.
Honestly that 58 Remington of yours throws a pretty big ball sir and no doubt makes a wide wound channel. At close range and spot on. I don't see much tracking involved. But as we both already know anything is possible when a big game animal is wounded. |
January 22, 2015, 09:35 PM | #13 |
Staff
Join Date: November 2, 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 21,824
|
Good hunting stories BirchOrr.
BTW, deerslayer303, shot placement is everything.
__________________
Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt. Molon Labe! |
January 22, 2015, 09:57 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 7, 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,246
|
Using a .45 cal pistol at 25 yds is no different than using a .45 cal rifle at 100 yds. It's done often enough and typically gives complete passthroughs. If that doesn't leave a blood trail then you aimed too high... But then most seem to claim a pileup in short order.
|
January 22, 2015, 10:41 PM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 14, 2010
Location: Border of Idaho & Montana
Posts: 2,584
|
Quote:
__________________
Shot placement is everything! I would rather take a round of 50BMG to the foot than a 22short to the base of the skull. all 26 of my guns are 45/70 govt, 357 mag, 22 or 12 ga... I believe in keeping it simple. Wish my wife did as well... |
|
January 23, 2015, 02:01 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 7, 2010
Posts: 330
|
http://fishandgame.idaho.gov/public/...s/?getPage=299 - it says muzzleloading rifle or musket.
edit: OK, I see you mean the general season. I was thinking of the ML season. You may be right. By all means use your pistol.
__________________
"I should have picked alcohol, drugs, or beating my wife..." Pete Rose Last edited by Idaho Spud; January 23, 2015 at 02:10 AM. |
January 23, 2015, 02:40 AM | #17 |
Junior member
Join Date: April 22, 2014
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,549
|
Idaho Spud
Load the Walker correctly not no 40 grains use 50 and 60 grains and then chronograph it. Yes you would have to use it for modern season or for grouse, yotes, cougar, bobcats, bear.... |
January 23, 2015, 02:52 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 7, 2010
Posts: 330
|
Mine were shot in a ROA. Didn't realize the OP meant a Walker specifically. I guess 20 more grains of powder would make the load a little zippier. Any idea what velocity that might be?
__________________
"I should have picked alcohol, drugs, or beating my wife..." Pete Rose |
January 23, 2015, 06:33 AM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 7, 2008
Location: pa.
Posts: 2,450
|
i shot a doe standing facing me at about 50 yards with a tc hawkin flint lock in .45 cal with a .440 prd. i hit her high on the white spot center chest, at the shot she wheeled around and went into a death roll flopping and kicking as she went down for good. when i was about to gut her i inserted my knife point at the rear of her utter and hit the ball with the knife point, the ball had just about gone clear thru her lenth wise and was expanded to .47 calibier. while i do like a heavier ball and calibier the .440 and .454 rb,s will kill. eastbank.
|
January 23, 2015, 07:00 AM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 14, 2009
Location: Sunshine and Keystone States
Posts: 4,461
|
Quote:
Sorry, couldn't resist. |
|
January 23, 2015, 09:32 AM | #21 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: August 30, 2010
Posts: 1,635
|
Quote:
Quote:
I have not located nor been presented with any primary nor secondary sources with citations that indicate a design intent by either Colt nor Walker to be able to shoot horses. Now granted, I cannot say my research on this was exhaustive. I bought and through inter-library loan read several books on the topic, including Sam Colt's Own Record 1847 which includes all the known correspondence surrounding the development of the Walker. Full previous discussion on this topic can be found in this thread: thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=539837 Anyway, to date, I have found no citation indicating a desire from either Walker, Colt, nor Whitney about the expected firepower or use of the Walker, other than to indicate the caliber and charge. If it was a standard tactic of the day to de-horse adversaries then it's possible there is documentation to support that outside of the context of the Walker revolver. I have not researched that. What Walker himself stated of the Walker revolver was that it was as good as a rifle and better than a musket at 100 yards. That is what I think Colt was aiming for. I am of course quite open to evidence which supports the idea that shooting horses was a design requirement. Steve |
||
January 23, 2015, 10:18 AM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 6, 2014
Location: Frozen North
Posts: 272
|
As in everything, it depends on your ability to put the bullet where it counts. You could just wound a deer even with a 12 gauge slug if your shot placement is poor. Marksmanship aside, anything that can kill a man can kill a deer. I have known of deer taken with 10 gauge BB shot and even with a 22, but wouldn't recommend it.
__________________
Cry HAVOC! and let loose the chihuahuas of war. My wife told me that I can't have too many guns, I agreed and told her I can never have too many guns...and then the trouble began |
January 23, 2015, 10:41 AM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 10, 2011
Location: Leesville SC
Posts: 2,652
|
Thanks guys for all the informative replies. The 58 will accompany me and the .50 Hawken the entire up coming season. I am very confident with the Remington out to 40 yards. I do quite well with minute of cheap dollar store paper plates, which is equivalent to the boiler room on a whitetail. I may work with some swiss, or 777 as suggested for a little more thump. The scoped centerfires will stay home this year.
|
January 23, 2015, 02:20 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 25, 2012
Location: Eaton Rapids, MI
Posts: 445
|
^^^
Go get "em!!!!!
All the best to you gentleman, great thread!!!!!! Birch
__________________
Black Powder: Not because it is easy, but because it is hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win... |
January 26, 2015, 10:34 AM | #25 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 8, 2013
Location: Rittman, Ohio
Posts: 2,074
|
Quote:
I tend to follow your first instincts. Unless you have a Walker, your looking at a .38 spl comparison. I sure wouldn't take a 40 yard shot on a deer. I'd be hesitant at 25 yards. General Custer was known for killing buffalo with them, but he basically chased them around on a horse, and got right up next to them, and kept putting multiple balls into them (with multiple guns) until they eventually went down. In one account he shot his own horse in the head and killed it when grabbing the reign with a cocked revolver in hand. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|