March 31, 2014, 08:19 PM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 31, 2002
Location: Deep in the Heart of the Lone Star State (TX)
Posts: 2,169
|
Sad fact is that revolver calibers are waning in sales (except for the .38Spl). Auto calibers are more readily available. A GP100 in 10mm/.40S&W would sell better than one in .44SPL.
|
March 31, 2014, 08:27 PM | #27 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 8, 2013
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 365
|
Quote:
|
|
March 31, 2014, 08:33 PM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 1, 2008
Posts: 849
|
Rossi Model 720 44 Spl. Built on a "D" size frame 3 inch barrel Rossi 44 Mag ..Built on a Taurus compact frame 2.5 inch barrel Charter Bulldog 44 Spl. Frame size just slightly bigger than a J frame....21 oz.... 2.5 inch barrel I don't see the question as "Can they do it" ? but..."Why don't they do it" ? The 44 Spl. is a great round ....for Two legged and Four Legged predators !!! |
April 1, 2014, 09:12 AM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 14, 2004
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 6,117
|
http://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/w...layErrorView_Y
If you think is would be so hard to do then you haven’t seen the S&W 69. 5 shot 44 magnum L frame. And as others have put it so well, all the other guns manufactures that don’t seem to have a problem building mid framed revolvers in 44 special. Another claim is sales. Have you seen the prices of 44 caliber guns recently or how well the Bulldog is doing. I have been writing Ruger customer support every other week begging for just that gun and surprisingly I get an answer every time. Mostly that they are considering new designs but with sales as they are they can't add to their already over book production. My suggestion if you think this is a valid idea and would be interested in one use the location below and request one. Takes several minutes, that’s all. http://www.ruger.com/footer/contact.html#
__________________
It was a sad day when I discovered my universal remote control did not in fact control the universe. Did you hear about the latest study.....5 out of 6 liberals say that Russian Roulette is safe. |
April 1, 2014, 09:20 AM | #30 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Location: SC
Posts: 2,743
|
Quote:
|
|
April 1, 2014, 05:37 PM | #31 | |
Junior member
Join Date: February 11, 2014
Posts: 106
|
A .44Spl or .41Mag would have to be a five-shot. I'd be all over either one. I never would've thought there was enough market but S&W's new 69 might prove me wrong. GP's are good guns, new S&W's are of no interest.
Quote:
|
|
April 1, 2014, 06:09 PM | #32 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 19, 2012
Location: Western PA
Posts: 3,829
|
Quote:
__________________
0331: "Accuracy by volume." |
|
April 1, 2014, 06:39 PM | #33 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 11, 2014
Posts: 106
|
Better is better and deer aren't much different from people.
|
April 1, 2014, 06:58 PM | #34 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 19, 2012
Location: Western PA
Posts: 3,829
|
Quote:
Remember, "stopping power" isn't about velocity, energy, penetration, wounding potential, or any of that; it's simply about results. And studies of handgun shootings show that there's very little difference between the common handgun calibers in terms of actual results. Here's one of those studies.
__________________
0331: "Accuracy by volume." |
|
April 1, 2014, 06:58 PM | #35 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 24, 2012
Location: South Texas
Posts: 2,126
|
Deer are not able to shoot back last time I checked. Both are mammals but after that it all goes out the window. Deer can take allot of punishment, most often though they don't know where it came from, total different state of mind to a predator with a deadly goal.
|
April 1, 2014, 08:12 PM | #36 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 26, 2013
Posts: 159
|
I dearly love my Charter Arms Bulldog in .44 Special. I like shooting .44 Special rounds in my Model 29. The caliber is a perfect combination of big-bullet stopping power and easy-to-handle light recoil.
That said, Ruger is probably a long way from making a GP100 in .44 Special. Heck, I'm still waiting for Ruger to replace the Security Six (and S&W Model 19) snubbies with a GP100 with a 2.5" barrel and fully adjustable sights, also a GP100 with a 7 chambered cylinder would be nice, and a Redhawk in .357 Magnum with an 8 round cylinder is long overdue given that S&W and Taurus already offer high-capacity large frame .357 Magnums. Whatever Ruger does right, it has for some time now missed the bus on innovation. Its little .380 LCP was stolen outright from KelTec, and the influence of other models from other companies are readily apparent in some of their other firearms. Forget modern metallurgy - Ruger offers nothing with titanium or scandium. Even its piston-driven AR rifle has all been done before by others. Ruger may last forever resting on its laurels, and I hope it does, but it's a shame a company that started out so creative now has a cloudy crystal ball. |
April 1, 2014, 09:28 PM | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 29, 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,346
|
I just noticed that the S&W M69 is a .44 magnum, not just a Special. Now that is very interesting! A 5-shot L-frame .44 mag with 4.25" bbl. that is on my short list. And adjustable rear sight.
I would still like a 3" GP100 5-shot .44 Special. |
April 3, 2014, 08:03 PM | #38 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 12, 2012
Location: Land of Enchantment
Posts: 436
|
If Ruger offered a 5-shot 44 Mag in its GP-100 frame I'd buy one in a heartbeat. I'm patiently waiting for the new S&W 69 (L frame) to become available.
|
April 4, 2014, 07:14 PM | #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 12, 2012
Location: Land of Enchantment
Posts: 436
|
Got lucky... Just picked up the first Model 69 the LGS has ever seen. Seems like a really handy little big bore.
This is the second new Smith I've bought in the last month or so, and the triggers on these new guns are really, really good right out of the box. I'm looking forward to shooting it. Will probably reserve my powerhouse 44M loads for the Redhawk. I think Ruger is missing out by not offering something similar. |
April 4, 2014, 08:49 PM | #40 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 8, 2013
Location: Rittman, Ohio
Posts: 2,074
|
I've never really seen a big bore revolver, even short barreled versions, that I didn't think was a little big and bulky for CCW. I too considered .44 spl, but was turned off by the size of those guns chambered for it. I carry a 5 shot .38 snubbie, and wouldn't want anything larger for CCW.
|
April 4, 2014, 09:27 PM | #41 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 26, 2006
Posts: 1,102
|
Magnums sell, but the M69 might just be one of the best things to ever happen to the .44 Special.
'Specially if it spurs Ruger into making a GP .44 Mag.
__________________
.44 Special: For those who get it, no explanation is necessary. For those who don't, no explanation is possible. |
April 5, 2014, 06:38 PM | #42 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Location: SC
Posts: 2,743
|
Quote:
Now you have the problem of whether the barrel is big enough, which I don't think it is. It's just the wrong platform, seems to me. The Alaska is way too beefy for just .44 Special, so Ruger is not really in the game in double action. Their Super Redhawk is goofy looking, so that's not the answer. |
|
April 5, 2014, 09:17 PM | #43 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 1, 2008
Posts: 849
|
If S&W can stuff it in there "L" frame...Ruger can in theres....now if they will or not ..thats the problem....
But I must say...I'm very happy with my Rossi 720 44 Spl. ...for my use...self defense for two legged critters... I'd have purchase a GP100 5 shot revolver...I just would... |
April 6, 2014, 02:41 AM | #44 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 29, 2006
Posts: 1,066
|
Search online and local shops for a used Redhawk (not the Super Redhawk) in .44 magnum, then shoot .44spl out of it.
|
April 6, 2014, 03:05 AM | #45 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 29, 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,346
|
The Redhawk is a big brute itself. Heavier than a S&W M629. The M29 Mountain Gun I have is handier, but the M69 lframe or a GP100 .44 would be even lighter and smaller.
|
April 6, 2014, 07:56 AM | #46 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Location: SC
Posts: 2,743
|
I have the Redhawk in 45 Colt, 4.2", and can say that the gun is too heavy and bulky to be a good .44 Special., especially to conceal. It is a 6 shot.
|
April 6, 2014, 09:07 AM | #47 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 29, 2006
Posts: 1,066
|
Maybe, but the OP didn't specify anything other than a GP100 in 44spl. The Redhawk is the closest thing to that and .44magnum could be used as well. I had a 4.5" Redhawk in 45Colt once and found the trigger on it so much nicer than my GP100 trigger due to the trigger return and hammer spring being one and the same.
|
April 6, 2014, 07:42 PM | #48 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 12, 2012
Location: Land of Enchantment
Posts: 436
|
Here's a photo of the new S&W 69 compared to a Redhawk. Both are 44 Magnum, but the 69 fits nicely into a GP100 holster.
|
April 6, 2014, 08:57 PM | #49 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 11, 2014
Posts: 106
|
The Redhawk is overbuilt for the .44Mag, silly huge for a .44Spl.
|
April 6, 2014, 09:27 PM | #50 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 29, 2006
Posts: 1,066
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|