The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Semi-automatic Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old January 21, 2014, 08:37 PM   #226
DT Guy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 4, 2001
Posts: 959
Instead of a grip safety, call it a 'reverse HK squeeze cocker' and charge $1800 for it; they won't be able to keep them on shelves.


Larry
__________________
He who fights and runs away had better run pretty damn fast.

Government, Anarchy and Chaos
DT Guy is offline  
Old January 21, 2014, 08:52 PM   #227
Fishbed77
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 23, 2010
Posts: 4,862
chris in va,

The Joker called. He wants his gun back.
Fishbed77 is offline  
Old January 21, 2014, 09:16 PM   #228
Sweet Shooter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 17, 2011
Posts: 672
Beautiful. Stunning. I want one. I was totally almost going PPKS, now I'm all like going R51.
-SS-
Sweet Shooter is offline  
Old January 22, 2014, 01:25 AM   #229
stormyone
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 30, 2005
Location: midwest
Posts: 532
This handgun makes me throw up a little bit in my mouth. It might be a nicely made and perfect operating handgun... I'm talking purely on looks.
stormyone is offline  
Old January 22, 2014, 02:16 AM   #230
jimbob86
Junior member
 
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: All the way to NEBRASKA
Posts: 8,722
Quote:
Exactly.

We're so used to guns looking like a variation of a 1911 or Glock. This type of barrel system could revolutionize handguns if proven reliable.

I submit this design for thinking 'out of the box'.



It's an Olympic target free pistol. Nobody makes fun of this design, why can't....
"Specialization is for insects", and THAT is one. ugly. bug!

There, I made fun of it.

I am a fan of "Practical" (IPSC is so NOT practical!)...... "Free Pistols" ? Nonesuch, in Reality. "Free Pistols" are are "IPSC Spaceguns" on 100 years of steroids.

I go back to The Good Colonel's Question: "What is it FOR?"

In this Age of Information, the Answer is still the same: "To SELL, of course!", but nowadays, the buyer is so much better informed ....... the Market is, and has always been, the final arbiter on what remains on the market ..... if the R51 can live up to it's Press ..... they won't be able to make enough of them for YEARS.
jimbob86 is offline  
Old January 23, 2014, 12:02 PM   #231
gyvel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 30, 2009
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 7,172
I freely admit that I have neither handled nor shot one of these, only seen pictures of it.

BUT: I stand by my original statement that the lack of a manual safety would concern me (YMMV). Since this a SAO gun, it tells me that there is, much like the early 51s, an internal hammer that must be cocked when the chamber is loaded. That means that the only thing between you and disaster is a grip safety, albeit a hellish one from what I have read.

Also, while this probably has no bearing on this particular gun, the original 51s had what I consider a major flaw in that the breech block was a delicate part, especially in the back portion of it where the roller is located.

Last edited by gyvel; January 23, 2014 at 10:06 PM.
gyvel is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.06808 seconds with 8 queries