|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 1, 2019, 11:21 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 26, 2005
Location: TX
Posts: 411
|
Trigger real light on a 686 in SA
I purchased a 686 today. I was dry firing the 686 and in single action it felt real lite. I felt if i sneezed it would go off. Is that normal? I have owned ruger sp101, gp100, and police service six they never felt like that.
__________________
life doesn't give you a second chance to learn from your mistakes. |
January 1, 2019, 11:48 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 7, 2009
Location: Western New York
Posts: 2,736
|
How everyone feels a trigger is actually hard to believe. I've had guys hand me guns at a match and ask me to see how fantastic it is. They stand there grinning from ear to ear waiting for my response and I'm wondering if the safety is on when I'm trying to get the trigger to break. I own two 686's and one 586. They have very good triggers on them and are a pleasure to shoot. That all being said, you can't tell how light a trigger is regardless of how it feels to you. You need to put a good trigger scale on it and take several readings to get a good average. Right now I have two TC Encore rifles that have had trigger jobs done on them. I was checking them to day to see what they actually were. Both were under three lbs., but they didn't feel that good. Trigger travel, angle, reach, etc all make a difference on feel. I've owned custom built revolvers and semi autos that had fantastic triggers on them and they were actually two lbs but felt like ounces. Summary: put a scale on it and see what it is. I think you'll be surprised that it's not as light as you think. FWIW, I used to shoot around 35,000 rounds of handgun a year and I still can't tell the weight without using an actual scale. I know good from bad, but not the weight.
|
January 2, 2019, 10:30 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 15, 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,566
|
A S&W revolver trigger in single action is usually light compared to the junk triggers in semi autos and Ruger revolvers. The S&W revolver has a double action feature so you don't have to shoot it single action if you don't want to. Ain't life great?
|
January 2, 2019, 11:16 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 16, 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,634
|
If you press on the cocked hammer with your thumb does it drop? (Unloaded gun of course...)
Was the gun purchased used? |
January 2, 2019, 12:27 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2, 2002
Location: Only1/2WayThere
Posts: 1,316
|
You need a trigger pull gauge and to check the hammer for push-off from the cocked position. My guess is you're accustomed to the horrible single-action on the Rugers and there's nothing actually wrong with the S&W.
(Apologies to all of the Ruger fans on the 'net. I once heard a gunshop clerk joking about how he hoped Ruger would introduce a 1911 so he could have a 1911 that required both index fingers to pull the trigger...) Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk |
January 2, 2019, 02:39 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 8, 2015
Posts: 1,021
|
Sounds perfect. Just be thankful and enjoy it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
January 2, 2019, 03:30 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 3, 2011
Location: Northern Colorado
Posts: 969
|
As long as it’s setting off primers you should be happy. I know I would be.
|
January 2, 2019, 03:46 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 28, 2006
Location: South Central Michigan...near
Posts: 6,501
|
Quote:
|
|
January 2, 2019, 04:32 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 13, 2013
Location: N. Georgia
Posts: 1,150
|
Regarding DA revolvers:
I've had out-of-the box Smiths with 3.5 pound single actions. I've had out-of-the-box Rugers with 3.5 pound single actions. I've had out-of-the-box Smiths with 6 pound single actions. I've had out-of-the-box Rugers with 6 pound single actions. Now on used Smiths and Rugers, it can be anyone's guess how the DA revolver will be in DA or SA. But I do like pontifical comments about how one maker's DA revolver is so much better than another. |
January 2, 2019, 04:56 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 31, 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 2,614
|
I'll echo what the others said about 1) actually measuring the SA trigger pull with a trigger gauge and 2) making sure there's no push-off in SA mode.
Beyond that, the factory SA & DA pull weights of your 686 ought to be around 4 and 11 pounds. If significantly lighter, it's possible the factory springs were swapped for lighter ones. Ideally, the ratio of the DA:SA pull weights is roughly 2.7:1. If only the SA is lighter, someone likely swapped out only the rebound spring. If the mainspring (and DA trigger is also light), you might get into reliability issues. Also check the mainspring tension screw to make sure someone didn't try to lighten the DA trigger by simply backing out the screw a bit. |
January 2, 2019, 05:08 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 9, 2002
Location: northern CA for a little while longer
Posts: 1,931
|
The best way to measure trigger pull weight for a revolver cocked into SA (or a cocked 1911) is to use weights, and know how to use them. This means being taught how to observe the cocked trigger "hold" at a weight, and then having the trigger tripped to fall with a slight movement of the gun.
Back in my S&W revolver armorer class notes, and in an older S&W revolver manual I inherited from the former head armorer, the minimum trigger pull weight for a S&W revolver cocked into single action is 3lbs. Minimum. That doesn't mean it can't be heavier in any particular revolver, depending on the tolerances and how the parts fit. Now, the perception of people can easily vary. One person's "hair trigger" is another person's "could be lighter and still be within normal spec" trigger. Also, some people haven't been trained to regulate and control the force exerted by their index fingers, and they have a hard time realizing how much force they may be exerting, and how quickly. If you're curious or concerned about it, probably the best way to know the condition and SA trigger pull weight of your 686 is to have a gunsmith check it using traditional weights. if it's a new gun, the factory could also check it under their warranty. Most people complain about how they feel new production revolvers have too heavy of a SA trigger pull, though, not too light. Might cause a factory revolver repair tech a moment's double take and chuckle. (Unless it IS too light to be within spec, or has a 'push off' problem, and then they'll correct it.) Congrats on the 686. A great (but heavy) stainless revolver. I carried a couple issued ones back in the mid/late 80's. Should've bought the last one when they offered us the opportunity to buy one ($235, I think was the price offered to us) when we transitioned to hi-cap 9's. I think I only had just over 3,500 rounds fired through the second one, and it was fine revolver for a working gun. Also, try not to have your finger on the trigger of the cocked revolver is you feel a sneeze coming on ...
__________________
Retired LE - firearms instructor & armorer |
January 2, 2019, 05:30 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 11, 2000
Posts: 824
|
My 6” S&W 19-4 is set up like a target gun; its SA trigger feels much lighter than my 4” LE turn-in 19-5 — different gunsmiths/armorers with different objectives. The 19-4 is only used at the target range with wadcutters. My 686 is very similar to the LE turn-in with a smooth, crisp but not overly light trigger.
|
January 2, 2019, 05:42 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 2, 2001
Location: Out West in Rim Country
Posts: 1,093
|
coolride, If it is substantially lighter than the other revolvers you mention, I would suspect that something has been modified internally. I've owned quite a few S&W revolvers since the '60s. None had SA triggers so light as to cause me any concern. I have handled revolvers with internal modifications resulting in SAs so light, that if loaded, might have gone off if I'd sneezed....
Using my little Lyman digital gauge, I weighed the SA triggers of couple S&W revolvers, a Colt DA, and a Ruger DA. All break cleanly, none push off, and none feel unusually light or heavy to me. But I admit that I couldn't really tell you exact pull weights without a trigger gauge. The average was 4 1/8#, with a 686 being the heaviest at 4 3/4#, and a late '50s Colt 3-5-7 model lightest at 3 1/2#. PS, fastbolt, a 686 was the last revolver I carried before we transitioned to semi-autos. Fine revolver, and with the L-frames, I routinely picked up a point or two in qualification over my scores with the Model 66
__________________
COTEP 640, NRA Life |
January 2, 2019, 05:48 PM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 26, 2013
Location: on the lam
Posts: 1,735
|
Quote:
|
|
January 2, 2019, 05:54 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 16, 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,634
|
They were designed to fire in single action just as much as they were designed to fire double action... What single action revolver does S&W sell that would be comparable to a 686? What single action revolver does anyone sell that would be comparable to a 686?
|
January 2, 2019, 07:15 PM | #16 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: October 28, 2006
Location: South Central Michigan...near
Posts: 6,501
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
January 2, 2019, 07:22 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 14, 2004
Location: NY State
Posts: 6,575
|
My M29 has a clean 2.5 lb SA and a very smooth 9 lb DA. I target and hunt SA . SA hunting I remove the padding over the last joint to get more trigger feel. a good practice for that job.
__________________
And Watson , bring your revolver ! |
January 2, 2019, 07:32 PM | #18 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 16, 2006
Location: IOWA
Posts: 8,783
|
Worth checking
Quote:
Would not hurt to check it with a trigger gauge. .. Be Safe !!!
__________________
'Fundamental truths' are easy to recognize because they are verified daily through simple observation and thus, require no testing. |
|
January 2, 2019, 07:40 PM | #19 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: May 31, 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 2,614
|
Quote:
Short version: Swapping in just a lighter rebound spring will impact the SA weight more dramatically than the DA pull weight. Longer version: The rebound spring applies force to the trigger, whereas the mainspring applies force to the hammer. So yes, reducing either spring will lower the DA trigger pull weight (since you're actuating the trigger and hammer); but to break the SA sear, you really only move the trigger, so the SA trigger pull weight is dictated by the strength of the rebound spring only and not by the mainspring. As such, swapping in just a lighter rebound spring will impact the SA weight more dramatically than the DA pull weight. |
||
January 2, 2019, 08:13 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 16, 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,634
|
What single action Colt comes in .357 is stainless steel, adjustable sight, swing out cylinder and under cost $1,500? Or has any of those features for that matter? Is it really that hard for you to understand that someone might want a gun that fires SA and DA?
|
January 2, 2019, 10:48 PM | #21 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: October 26, 2008
Posts: 557
|
Quote:
Quote:
Also used to shoot NRA metallic silhouette and once again all the revolver shooters used their guns in the SA mode. I could less about humps or bumps . I'll just shoot the gun the way I want. |
||
January 2, 2019, 10:55 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 26, 2005
Location: TX
Posts: 411
|
NoSecondBest
I will look into a scale to see how the lbs on the trigger. Thanks for the info.
__________________
life doesn't give you a second chance to learn from your mistakes. |
January 2, 2019, 10:58 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 26, 2005
Location: TX
Posts: 411
|
dahermit
I do plan on using it in double action for the most part. There are times I would like to shot is single action.
__________________
life doesn't give you a second chance to learn from your mistakes. |
January 2, 2019, 11:00 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 26, 2005
Location: TX
Posts: 411
|
rock185,
I bought is used and it is a 686 with no dash and has what appears to have an M stamp.
__________________
life doesn't give you a second chance to learn from your mistakes. |
January 3, 2019, 12:06 AM | #25 |
Member
Join Date: October 9, 2012
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 73
|
coolridelude,
I have a 1980's pre-lock 686 4" bbl that I've owned since new. The DA trigger has lightened a bit with lots of use and the SA trigger pull is decent, but not light. A few months ago, I bought a new 686 Plus and took it to the range a couple weeks ago. The DA pull was a bit heavier than my older 686 and the trigger return travel was rather notchy and gritty. However, the SA pull was VERY light - I would guess 3lbs or less (haven't measured). The revolver is accurate - VERY accurate - with the SA trigger, so I have no complaints on how light the trigger pull may be. I shot it initially SA to check on the revolver's accuracy. Once satisfied, I shoot DA and find it easy to 'stage' the trigger when shooting DA to still achieve accuracy - whether with my old 686 or the new. Enjoy your 686 and shoot it a lot! |
|
|