|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 10, 2011, 05:25 PM | #1 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: October 27, 2005
Location: Crescent Iowa
Posts: 2,971
|
Castle doc and a stand your ground law
seems to be needed in Iowa.
http://www.wowt.com/home/headlines/O...117637483.html Quote:
Quote:
Be careful, know the laws. I was unaware of this law. Quote:
|
|||
March 10, 2011, 05:56 PM | #2 |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,468
|
Moral: Never invite anyone into your home.
Although in reality I disagree with the DA on this. No sane person would invite someone into their home with the expectation of being assaulted. If someone whom I have allowed into my home decides to attack me, AFAIK I still have a legal, ethical and moral right to defend myself by whatever means are necessary and appropriate. |
March 10, 2011, 05:59 PM | #3 | |
member
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 8,462
|
Neither one would have helped the shooter in this case. Castle Doctrine laws typically only protect against people who forcibly and unlawfully enter your home. This person was invited in as a guest according to the story.
Stand your ground laws remove the duty to retreat, if you can do so safely. The shooter in this case did retreat into the kitchen before firing. From the news report: Quote:
Well, just peeked at Iowa law... and wow... not great self defense law. Iowa has no statutory "Castle Doctrine" or "Stand Your Ground" at all. The entire self-defense statute seems to be summed up as: "704.1 Reasonable force. "Reasonable force" is that force and no more which a reasonable person, in like circumstances, would judge to be necessary to prevent an injury or loss and can include deadly force if it is reasonable to believe that such force is necessary to avoid injury or risk to one's life or safety or the life or safety of another, or it is reasonable to believe that such force is necessary to resist a like force or threat. Reasonable force, including deadly force, may be used even if an alternative course of action is available if the alternative entails a risk to life or safety, or the life or safety of a third party, or requires one to abandon or retreat from one's dwelling or place of business or employment." I'm not familiar with Iowa law or case law interpreting this; but just looking at the statutes, it seems the shooter would not have been required to retreat from his home; but would have been required to retreat inside the home so long as he could do so safely. If he could not retreat safely or had tried, then he could use "reasonable force." "704.3 Defense of self or another. A person is justified in the use of reasonable force when the person reasonably believes that such force is necessary to defend oneself or another from any imminent use of unlawful force." In another odd bit of law, it seems that less-lethal munitions are considered deadly force in Iowa ess[/i] they are wielded by a police officer in which case they are no longer deadly force. |
|
March 11, 2011, 04:48 PM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 27, 2005
Location: Crescent Iowa
Posts: 2,971
|
Quote:
Didja see we voted some judges out? High court they were, now gone, too liberal. It will get better, soon too. |
|
March 11, 2011, 05:07 PM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 1, 2009
Location: Stillwater, OKlahoma
Posts: 8,638
|
Quote:
Basically if the room you were in had a window,,, You should have used it to escape. They (at least up to 1996) have no castle doctrine. When the chief of Police at my wife's station told me this,,, I made the decision then and there to leave that state. Gone in less than 6 months,,, Never looked back. Aarond
__________________
Never ever give an enemy the advantage of a verbal threat. Caje: The coward dies a thousand times, the brave only once. Kirby: That's about all it takes, ain't it? Aarond is good,,, Aarond is wise,,, Always trust Aarond! (most of the time) |
|
March 11, 2011, 05:29 PM | #6 |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,468
|
Not sure, but I believe Massachusetts (that bastion of liberty!) also requires retreat within your own home. Of course, Massachusetts is also one of the few original states whose state constitution specifically links the RKBA to defense of the state -- no personal defense allowed.
|
March 11, 2011, 06:19 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
I remember a case in Massachusetts...
... during Spring Break time-frame of 1987 or 1988, where a woman was charged with manslaughter for hitting a burglar over the head with a kid's gumball machine.
He'd broken in during the night. Startled and scared, she grabbed the first thing at hand. When he came around the corner, she hit him. IIRC, she was charged because she ambushed him, instead of retreating or even leaving the house. I don't remember how that ultimately turned out, but I do remember the very bad taste it left in my mouth for the criminal justice system in MA. |
March 11, 2011, 06:54 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 10, 2010
Posts: 317
|
lets just leave our doors open so they can steal all our stuff. when they are at it, run away.
|
March 12, 2011, 03:10 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 28, 2007
Location: Reno, Nevada
Posts: 196
|
Quote:
__________________
R.I.P Sam "Trout" Barbetta 82nd Airborne, S.F biker, friend. http://www.ahalenia.com/memorial/sbarbetta.html |
|
March 12, 2011, 03:30 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 24, 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,903
|
Part of the story doesn't look very good for the shooter.
Quote:
|
|
March 12, 2011, 06:39 PM | #11 | |
Staff
Join Date: June 8, 2008
Posts: 4,022
|
Quote:
|
|
March 12, 2011, 06:57 PM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 12, 2006
Location: NKY
Posts: 12,463
|
Quote:
__________________
"He who laughs last, laughs dead." Homer Simpson |
|
March 14, 2011, 04:19 PM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 27, 2005
Location: Crescent Iowa
Posts: 2,971
|
Quote:
The main point that gets me is the law, which needs to be changed. We have been writting letters and sending emails as a law is being considered on the very subject in a couple weeks. Guy was shot in the foot and the head so one warning shot wasnt a warning after all, this might have increased the guys anger and maybe is why he continued his attack? Be carefull, I sure am. |
|
|
|