September 22, 2015, 09:19 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 2, 2015
Posts: 500
|
Nightsights
Does anyone have some photos of tritium nightsights new and nightsights after a decade or other long period of time?
Not quite sure if these sights that came with a handgun need to be replaced. They seem a bit dim. |
September 23, 2015, 02:11 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 2, 2007
Posts: 641
|
9x18,
I've had Trijicons or Meprolights in some of my pistols for about ten years and they still seem to function fine. The thing to remember is that the green tritium sights will lose about half of their brightness every 12 years. The red and yellow lose brightness in about half that time. Sorry I don't own a camera to take pics. best wishes- oldandslow PS- if you want to get the sights relamped the easiest way is to send the slide to a company called Tooltech ( www.tooltechgunsight.com) who will replace the tritium vials with new ones for a reasonable price. |
September 23, 2015, 02:13 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 2, 2015
Posts: 500
|
Thanks.
I just bought a LEO-trade in USP that had some nightsights on it, but they seem pretty dim to me. To what am I comparing? Nothing. I'm taking a hunch. Well, I just purchased a new set of Trijicon HDs, so we will see how much I can sell the old ones for... |
September 23, 2015, 02:21 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 19, 2012
Location: Western PA
Posts: 3,829
|
I'm no photographer, but it seems to me that using a photo won't work well. Considering tritium is only visible in low-light situations, it's going to be really hard to tell if the difference is due to the brightness of the tritium or the camera settings. Or just the overall quality of the camera.
A better way is to try to determine how old your sights are. The half-life of tritium is about 12 years; so in 12 years they should be about half as bright as when they were new. If they're factory sights and the box came with a little manila envelope that holds the test-fire casings, often the date on the package will tell you when it was test-fired in the factory, which should be pretty close to its manufacture date. The oldest set of tritium sights I had were made by Meprolight, and I started to notice them getting dim at around the 8 year mark. Even then, they were still definitely usable as night sights. I never found out how much more noticable the dimness became after that because I sold that handgun soon after. EDIT: Oops, forgot to refresh my browser before answering; when I wrote this response there were no replies yet.
__________________
0331: "Accuracy by volume." |
September 23, 2015, 02:51 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 2, 2015
Posts: 500
|
Thanks Theo.
The USP is from 2004, so I'm guessing the sights were probably put on then. I'm pretty well versed in physics/chemistry, but the half-life is pretty useless to me when I've actually never seen the brightness of new nightsights. I'm doubtful the LE agency would have replaced the sights, but I have a pusher and Trijicon HDs on the way! |
September 23, 2015, 09:17 AM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
|
Quote:
Example Which of these is "correct" the same compass, same illumination from the glow in the dark, but different exposures on the camera.: (Images (c) Wogpotter 2014)
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”? Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.” |
|
September 23, 2015, 02:25 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 2, 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 365
|
I'd just take the gun outside at night and sight down the gun under a few different low light conditions. Then decide if they are bright enough for your needs. The percentage of original brightness doesn't seem as important as if they will still work for your needs.
__________________
What part of "... shall not be infringed" do you not understand?! NRA Life |
September 23, 2015, 04:56 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 4,811
|
Yep, that will work.
I have a 18 year old Betalight operated compass. Its dimmer than it was, but its still enough to work fine. Just make sure to let your eyes night acclimatize for 15~20 minutes before testing.
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”? Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.” |
September 24, 2015, 06:13 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 2, 2015
Posts: 500
|
Hmmm... I am a bit disappointed.
The new Trijicon HDs came in and they look to be the same brightness as the old Meprolights? What the *?@!. Guess I'll be returning them. Last edited by 9x18_Walther; September 24, 2015 at 06:35 PM. |
September 24, 2015, 07:24 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 2, 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 365
|
Don't you hate it when that happens; you think you are upgrading and it turns out to be no better. Man I hate when I blow money that way. At least now you know.
__________________
What part of "... shall not be infringed" do you not understand?! NRA Life |
September 24, 2015, 09:22 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 2, 2015
Posts: 500
|
Quote:
Honestly, I never knew how "bright" night sights were supposed to be. Now I know! Looks like the sight pusher was for nothing... Maybe I'll put night sights on something else. |
|
September 24, 2015, 10:34 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 19, 2012
Location: Western PA
Posts: 3,829
|
Most people seem to put way too much emphasis on night sights. To me, tritium night sights are a bonus, but what I'm really looking for is a good pair of sights that work well during the time of day where I use them most: Daylight.
That's what makes Trijicon HDs so good; they have an excellent daytime sight picture with the large, bright front dot and the wide, black U-notch rear. The fact that they also have tritium vials for use in low-light situations is a bonus, but it's not my primary concern. Keep the HD sights; in my opinion they're a big upgrade over your old sights, which I'm guessing were three-white-dot sights, which I hate.
__________________
0331: "Accuracy by volume." |
September 24, 2015, 11:02 PM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 2, 2015
Posts: 500
|
Quote:
|
|
September 24, 2015, 11:21 PM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 19, 2012
Location: Western PA
Posts: 3,829
|
Quote:
__________________
0331: "Accuracy by volume." |
|
September 24, 2015, 11:56 PM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 2, 2015
Posts: 500
|
Quote:
|
|
September 25, 2015, 12:22 AM | #16 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: April 19, 2012
Location: Western PA
Posts: 3,829
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
0331: "Accuracy by volume." |
||
September 25, 2015, 12:33 AM | #17 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 2, 2015
Posts: 500
|
Quote:
The brightness of the tritium in both was about equal. I didn't realize that the Trijicon's require light exposure for the paint outline to glow. I think I would go with tritium + fiber optic in the future. |
|
September 25, 2015, 02:20 AM | #18 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: April 19, 2012
Location: Western PA
Posts: 3,829
|
Quote:
And that shows how useless photoluminescent sights are: I've used Trijicon HDs for three years now and I never noticed it. Every time I've trained with an HD-equipped gun I was either drawing from a holster in the dark or I was outside and the light had gradually gotten dimmer and the photoluminescence had dimmed until it wasn't noticable. Either way, I've never seen the photoluminescence; the only glow I've ever noticed was from the tritium in the sights. To me, that just reinforces the fact that's it's a good idea to pick your sights based on their daytime performance. And that's where the HDs really stand out in my opinion. Quote:
__________________
0331: "Accuracy by volume." |
||
September 25, 2015, 02:53 AM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 2, 2015
Posts: 500
|
Quote:
|
|
September 26, 2015, 08:01 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 1, 2013
Posts: 150
|
I once read a post from a guy who was worried to death that his newly installed Tritium sights were so bright that they would illuminate his face when he brought his pistol up, thus making him a target for the bad guy. Well at least you don't have to worry about that.
|
September 27, 2015, 02:10 AM | #21 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 2, 2015
Posts: 500
|
Quote:
I'm sure they found night vision plus an infrared laser far more tactical. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|