The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old August 20, 2014, 01:01 PM   #1
dangthathurt
Member
 
Join Date: February 6, 2012
Posts: 54
223 Rem and Barnes 70 gr TSX loads?

I'm working up some "Hog Hammer" rounds.
I have LC 223 brass, CCI 400 primers, and Barnes 70 gr TSX bullets.
For powder I have on hand H335 and TAC.

Any suggestions?
dangthathurt is offline  
Old August 20, 2014, 01:32 PM   #2
Marco Califo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 4, 2011
Location: LA (Greater Los Angeles Area)
Posts: 2,598
Barnes 5.56 Loads

If you can shoot 5.56 loads you are in luck. Barnes lists those two powders for that bullet.
http://www.barnesbullets.com/wp-cont.../5.56-Nato.pdf
Note that these loads are different from their 223 loads.
http://www.barnesbullets.com/wp-cont...mingtonWeb.pdf
I have pierced some CCI 400 primers, and switched to #41's for that reason.
I have only shot these at paper, but accuracy was good.
Others will post that the 70 grn copper bullet is tough and will not expand dramatically; and recommend lighter weight copper bullets.
__________________
............
Marco Califo is offline  
Old August 20, 2014, 10:12 PM   #3
dangthathurt
Member
 
Join Date: February 6, 2012
Posts: 54
I'm surprised by the difference in max loads using TAC.
223 REM max. 23.5 grains
5.56 NATO max. 26.0 grains

My RRA AR is rated for 5.56 NATO with a Wylde chamber.

Should I just jump in with the 5.56 data?
dangthathurt is offline  
Old August 20, 2014, 10:55 PM   #4
Marco Califo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 4, 2011
Location: LA (Greater Los Angeles Area)
Posts: 2,598
Yes, I would use the 5.56 starting load

Yes, I would use the 5.56 starting load as a starting point.

You need 1:9 or faster twist to shoot the 70 grs. Barnes says 1:8 or faster, but I have shot these in a 1:9 and found them to be accurate at least to 100 yards. I would also see how long you can seat them in your magazine. I understand the Wylde chamber accommodates the longer M855 62 gr bullet, and that is the main distinction between 223 and 5.56. I shoot these and other heavy bullets in a Savage Edge/Axis and it has a long throat that lets me load to a longer OAL, like around 2.40 in the magazine and chamber no problem. I bought another Savage a Model 10 variant, and it does NOT like long bullets at all. 2.25 tops.
__________________
............

Last edited by Marco Califo; August 20, 2014 at 11:07 PM.
Marco Califo is offline  
Old August 20, 2014, 11:06 PM   #5
Water-Man
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 23, 2008
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 2,126
Hog Hammer's are 62gr. loads.
Water-Man is offline  
Old August 20, 2014, 11:14 PM   #6
dangthathurt
Member
 
Join Date: February 6, 2012
Posts: 54
Mine will be called the "Long Pig Hammer"
dangthathurt is offline  
Old August 20, 2014, 11:17 PM   #7
dangthathurt
Member
 
Join Date: February 6, 2012
Posts: 54
I'm going to seat them magazine length.
Do you think this would make them compressed loads at the higher charges?
dangthathurt is offline  
Old August 20, 2014, 11:28 PM   #8
Water-Man
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 23, 2008
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 2,126
What twist rate do you have?
Water-Man is offline  
Old August 20, 2014, 11:54 PM   #9
Marco Califo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 4, 2011
Location: LA (Greater Los Angeles Area)
Posts: 2,598
Quote:
would make them compressed loads at the higher charges?
No unless your mag is shorter than 2.25" That is the COAL Barnes used and with TAC that is 94% case load density.
__________________
............
Marco Califo is offline  
Old August 21, 2014, 12:30 AM   #10
dangthathurt
Member
 
Join Date: February 6, 2012
Posts: 54
I have a 1:8 twist.

I know it stabilizes 77gr SMK's like a dream. I got into the 500 yard prairie dog club with them.

Thanks guys.
dangthathurt is offline  
Old August 21, 2014, 06:01 AM   #11
steve4102
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 23, 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,955
Ramshot TAC 223 data.

Code:
 70 BARNES TSX-BT Start=21.6, 2,658fps,... Max=24.0,  2,884fps, 54,544psi, 2.260 OAL
http://www.ramshot.com/wp-content/up...ec_1-23-14.pdf
steve4102 is offline  
Old August 21, 2014, 12:40 PM   #12
dangthathurt
Member
 
Join Date: February 6, 2012
Posts: 54
Thanks for the data!
dangthathurt is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.06936 seconds with 8 queries