|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 15, 2009, 05:04 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: September 29, 2009
Posts: 50
|
1860 Army Belgium made ?
I have noticed in the past a few 1860 Armys being listed as Belgium made on Gun Broker .
Does anyone know the true value of these cap and ball pistols ? Seems the bidding is higher than on the more common Italian made reproductions . |
October 15, 2009, 05:14 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,188
|
They're not exactly clones but more like reissues. in 1853 Colt gave a license to Union d'Armes de Liege to manufacture Colt pistols. These were made under that same license to Colt specs in the 60's and 70's. They called it the 1960 Centaur.
|
October 15, 2009, 05:52 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 2, 2007
Location: Northern Orygun
Posts: 4,923
|
They go for $400 -$450 on GB normally. They a well made, good steel. Not uncommon for them to need work. There is a member here who has rebuilt many of them.
|
October 15, 2009, 06:37 PM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 15, 2005
Location: Central Connecticut
Posts: 3,166
|
Here's the Friends of the Centaur Society website:
http://www.1960nma.org/ Quote:
|
|
October 15, 2009, 08:26 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Naples, Fl
Posts: 5,440
|
Yup!
When you hold a Centaure it seems just a bit heftier than a Pietta, or a ASP or ASM. I never measured the dimensions of the pistol, but it just seems slightly bigger.
I like mine but I don't shoot it any more. I have "rifleo" rehab it and then retired it.
__________________
Seek truth. Relax. Take a breath. |
October 15, 2009, 10:13 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 8, 2006
Location: Northern Michigan
Posts: 2,772
|
Here's a comparison of the Centaur with a Pietta and a Euroarms (Armi San Paolo) example. I don't know that the Centaur is any larger; it seems a bit heavier, however. I'll have to weigh them all one of these days.
|
October 16, 2009, 02:40 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 30, 2007
Location: Hofheim/Germany
Posts: 102
|
Did some comparative measurements of 1 2nd gen Colt Army and 2 Centaures a while ago. For details see www.1960nma.org, Production page.
Muzzle dia # 2nd gen. #207514 (1982): .655 # Centaure C418 (1961): .675 # Centaure 12307 (1972): .686 Rifling groove dia # 2nd gen. #207514: .458 # Centaure C418: .448 # Centaure 12307: .445 This would make the Centaures slightly more front heavy. Bootsie aks Long Johns Wolf |
October 16, 2009, 06:00 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Naples, Fl
Posts: 5,440
|
And....
I think I remember holding mine next to other examples and realized that the barrel is longer by about 3/16 inch.
I am on travel so I can't get to them now and this issue is simply way to urgent to wait until I get home to redo the comparison.
__________________
Seek truth. Relax. Take a breath. Last edited by Doc Hoy; October 16, 2009 at 06:01 AM. Reason: Poor spelling |
|
|