|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 6, 2012, 09:53 PM | #26 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,833
|
At least some returning vets were allowed to purchase their sidearms, and rifles, if they so desired. And some of those "purchases" never involved Uncle Sam actually getting any money!
Lots of them were just "kept", others were "bought" from the supply sgts (who often pocketed the money and just combat lossed the guns) and some were actually bought and paid for, with all the proper paperwork. Over the years I have met vets who retained their service arms in each of these ways, so I do know it happened.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
December 7, 2012, 11:02 AM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 2, 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 243
|
My understanding from the talk was that there was no security in most places so you could take most of anything you wanted. And that the government was not much interested in accounting for, and storing, and inventorying tons and tons of equipment that was no longer needed for anything, would soon be obsolete, and maybe still didn't work good.
I know even long after the war of purchasing things left over for $1. They just wanted to get rid of it. The one written account, and published that I know of is Andy Rooney, in his book, about his WWII experience. He took his jeep with him. No one said anything, or cared, as they did not want to inventory, account for, ship back, etc a jeep that they could not then sell. Other than for $6. It wasn't worth it to the government. dc |
December 8, 2012, 02:20 PM | #28 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,833
|
The father of one of my friends, was a radio station operator, and upon his return to the states for discharge at San Francisco, he had a carbine and a .45. They asked him to pay for the carbine (which he was issued, per his rating) but not for the .45 (which had been given to him at his duty station). So he did, both.
There was more than a little variation on the practice, especially depending on who was on duty, and the time of day. Clearance personel at 2am, trying to process a shipload of troops tend to cut a few corners to get finished so they can all get some sleep.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
December 8, 2012, 02:37 PM | #29 |
Member
Join Date: August 24, 2012
Posts: 49
|
Gee, we've gone from weapons to jeeps.
I think the top response here is from old0311-1. And, if jeeps, why not b-29's and P-51's? Gotta love this stuff. |
December 9, 2012, 07:53 AM | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 8, 2006
Location: South Florida
Posts: 176
|
My grandfather, USMC, kept his 1911 after leaving the Pacific. He simply told me that he was able to bring it home with him. He never did talk much at all about WW2 and I wish he had but can understand why he wouldn't.
|
December 9, 2012, 09:12 AM | #31 |
Member
Join Date: August 24, 2012
Posts: 49
|
Had an opportunity to speak with another old grunt at the range yesterday. He assured me that upon return to the states, they were stripped of all US weaponry, and had to have all souveniers OK'd and signed over, as the photos erlier in this thread attest to. Also noted that upon release from the service they had to sign paperwork in which the Marine had to describe his physical condition, etc. Said if a man refused to sign, they would be held at base until they did, and that most guys just wanted to be on their way. I have also heard this from those who served in the army, that to get the ruptured duck, they had to indemnify the government from any future claims by signing paperwork establishing their physical and mental well being. Interesting.
Also interesting to note that all the "stories" of men keeping arms they had in combat appear to be largely just that, stories, and that the most likely true source for those arms was post war civilian purchase, in spite of what "Grandpa" said. |
December 9, 2012, 10:15 AM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2,313
|
The fact is, weapons were brought home, in both approved ways and un approved.
My father was a WWII vet of Europe. He told me that an uncle brought home an M1 Thompson SMG...the uncle served on a navy ocean going tug which pulled landing craft off invasion beaches. My uncle was in the beach party under fire, and armed only with a 1911. He picked up the Thompson, and kept it for the rest of the war. When my uncles ship docked in San Diego, he walked off with his sea bag and the Thompson over his shoulder, and nobody stopped him. According to my dad, they fired it one time at an Ohio farm in the late 1940's. My dad said it scared great grandfather so much, that the old man took the gun and buried it somewhere. They are all dead now, and no doubt, that Thompson is a pile of rust. My father was a weapons expert in his Cav unit. He had a collection of German automatic weapons on his armored car...MG42, MG34, and others. He used them to familiarize other units in the German weapons. He had arranged to have them dewated in France to bring home, when he got dysentery and went in the hospital. When he got out, his unit had shipped out for the Pacific, and all his stuff was gone. As an aside, the atom bombing in Japan meant that his unit beat him home...their ship just changed course mid trip. My father brought home two pistols from his service, both properly papered. I have one, and my brother has the other, and we both have the paperwork. Mine is my most reassured possession...it is sad that future generations won't get to have such heirlooms of the service of their relatives.
__________________
The past is gone...the future may never happen. Be Here Now. Last edited by amd6547; December 9, 2012 at 10:22 AM. |
December 9, 2012, 10:20 AM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 2, 2007
Location: Northern Orygun
Posts: 4,923
|
One thing can certainly be said about "bring back" discussions.
The first liar doesn't stand a chance! |
December 9, 2012, 11:01 AM | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 26, 2005
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 6,141
|
It's not hard to see why the M1 rifle was still being manufactured in the 1950s.
__________________
Shoot low, sheriff. They're riding Shetlands! Underneath the starry flag, civilize 'em with a Krag, and return us to our own beloved homes! Buy War Bonds. |
December 9, 2012, 08:04 PM | #35 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 21, 2010
Location: Central Georgia
Posts: 1,863
|
Quote:
__________________
NRA Life Member Read my blog! "The answer to any caliber debate is going to be .38 Super, 10mm, .357 Sig or .41 Magnum!" |
|
December 9, 2012, 08:40 PM | #36 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 2, 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 243
|
" Gee, we've gone from weapons to jeeps.
I think the top response here is from old0311-1. And, if jeeps, why not b-29's and P-51's? Gotta love this stuff." Ketland You don't have to go far from here to see still the old graveyards of surplus aircraft from the military. After WWII they had hundreds of them, which were dumped out in the desert and sat there for many years rotting and rusting. You usually could buy one for $1. You had to move it, store it, repair it, etc., and there are still many of them in operation today where exactly that was done. They did the same with ships. In San Francisco Bay there is a back bay called Suisun Bay (Susan Bay) where there are still dozens or more old ships, sitting, rusting. They revived one from WWII to use as a museum (the vets did, not the govt) and it was here in San Pedro for many years. I don't know where it went to now. A supply ship. Lane Victory. Here is a link. dc http://www.suisunbay.com/ http://www.lanevictory.org/ |
December 11, 2012, 10:11 AM | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 29, 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 6,126
|
Not just planes and ships. During the war the government built brand spanking new factories and after the war sold them for pennies on the dollar and in some cases gave them away.
The movie Tucker gives an example of that. Which is why it rings a little hollow when people say America should have had a Marshall Plan of it's own. We had the most modern industrial system in the history of the world, all paid for by Uncle Sam. By the way Israel armed itself to a great extent by buying "scrap" metal. Tons of surplus armaments were sold as scrap. The toaster you bought in 1948 could have been a bazooka in 47. |
December 11, 2012, 11:41 PM | #38 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 13, 2005
Posts: 4,700
|
One book I read about Korea said the Marines held onto many of their vehicles, amphtracs, etc., even got hold of Army vehicles, repainted them Marine Corps green. When the Korean War started they were much better prepared than the Army. Weapons have always been sensitive items in Uncle Sam's military, I doubt that many were brought back legally. Did Uncle Same EVER allow serving or retiring personnel to purchase their weapons?
|
December 12, 2012, 01:06 AM | #39 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
Gee, I didn't know those guys were able to bring home tanks and trucks and cannons and everything. I guess it was pretty free for all back then.* I don't mind that my neighbor brought home his B-29 from WWII, but it's got this big round thing underneath that he keeps fooling with. Should I move?
*Or a lot of WWII vets told a lot of lies. Jim |
December 12, 2012, 01:37 AM | #40 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2008
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 2,863
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Winchester 73, the TFL user that won the west |
||
December 12, 2012, 08:31 AM | #41 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 1, 2012
Posts: 280
|
Check out Gunther's biography here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%BCnther_Rall
|
December 12, 2012, 09:12 AM | #42 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,808
|
My dad was in Germany on VE day. They had recently occupied a small German village and had rounded up all civilian weapons. They were prepared to destory them when they got the word that the war had ended. An officer gave them permission to take anything they wanted.
Dad picked out this. A brand new pre war FN produced SXS with hang tags still on it. He built a wooden box and it cost him $1.50 to mail it back home. He could have just as easily have mailed back home a Luger, M-1, 1911 or anything else he could have gotten his hands on. I'm sure many others did. |
December 12, 2012, 10:37 AM | #43 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 5, 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 252
|
Quote:
|
|
December 12, 2012, 12:53 PM | #44 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 27, 2005
Posts: 288
|
I once spoke to a Korean War veteran (USMC) who told me he tried to bring back a Chinese burp gun and a M1911 on the troop ship back to the States. They were nearing port when they were told their bags would be checked for contraband, he got nervous, so over the side they went. He added that their bags were not checked after all.
__________________
"Remember, the people on the Internet are just like you - ignorant, delusional, and dangerous." |
December 12, 2012, 10:57 PM | #45 |
Staff
Join Date: November 2, 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 21,838
|
madcratebuilder - what's a Jap. consolation bag? Do they stuff ashes in it or what?
__________________
Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt. Molon Labe! |
December 14, 2012, 04:31 PM | #46 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 7, 2008
Location: pa.
Posts: 2,450
|
i know for a fact that GI,s were the worst kind thiefs, a friends dad told the story of breaking down doors and taking away all they could carry,another told of stealing(liberating) a very fine double barrel with two or three barrels,shotgun-shotgun,rifle-rifle, rifle-shotgun. as he had the shotgun-shotgun, i ask what happened to the other barrel,s and he said there is no honor amoung thiefs, some SOB stold them. eastbank.
|
December 14, 2012, 04:51 PM | #47 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 26, 2005
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 6,141
|
You may be shocked to learn that GIs might steal from one another (I think the word was "swipe"). No doubt Marines are above that sort of thing. Still, it's hard on the morale of your little unit, just like someone stealing someone's lunch at work.
__________________
Shoot low, sheriff. They're riding Shetlands! Underneath the starry flag, civilize 'em with a Krag, and return us to our own beloved homes! Buy War Bonds. |
December 15, 2012, 03:29 PM | #48 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 29, 2008
Location: now living in alabama
Posts: 2,433
|
Dad brought home a few from the pacific. His garand (his claim) an ariska (mum intact) and a set of swords taken in battle by him. Korea turned up a carbine. He never revealed how he got them home. All of which came into my possesion after his death. The Swords were not military issue and shortly after he passed, I returned them to the Japanese consulate to be returned to the proper family by custom. Dads rifles are kept in a glass case along with his medals in my gun room. I have no reason to doubt his word.
__________________
No such thing as a stupid question. What is stupid is not asking it. |
December 20, 2012, 08:29 PM | #49 |
Member
Join Date: August 24, 2012
Posts: 49
|
Dad brought home a few from the pacific. His garand (his claim) an ariska (mum intact) and a set of swords taken in battle by him. Korea turned up a carbine. He never revealed how he got them home. All of which came into my possesion after his death. The Swords were not military issue and shortly after he passed, I returned them to the Japanese consulate to be returned to the proper family by custom. Dads rifles are kept in a glass case along with his medals in my gun room. I have no reason to doubt his word.
__________________ Hmm, are you sure about the sword claim? Almost all, that being 99.999% of the "Samurai" swords brought back from battle, were production blades made in factories prior to, or during the war, and would not have been signed by the maker. Heirloom quality blades did make their way back to the US in some limited quantities, however those blades were either bartered or forfeited during the postwar occupation of the japanese homeland. This is how they come attached with a family pedigree, as well as the makers mark on the tang of the blade (known as Nakago, in japanese). Not here to disturb your fathers credibility, but the battle pick up story does not wash. The Garand and carbine story have some issues also, As I have researched this issue deeper, it turns out that the take home your rifle issue has been pretty much put to rest. If he did keep his garand, he would have had to jump some hoops to steal it. nuff said. |
December 20, 2012, 08:48 PM | #50 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 29, 2008
Location: now living in alabama
Posts: 2,433
|
I have no Idea what hoops he had to jump through but he had them. Yes, the blades were signed by maker and confirmed by consulate. They were very happy to get them back. Again, I have no reason to doubt his voracity.
__________________
No such thing as a stupid question. What is stupid is not asking it. Last edited by sc928porsche; December 20, 2012 at 08:54 PM. |
|
|