April 9, 2014, 12:19 AM | #51 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 7,839
|
Funny that 30-06 was good enough for snipers at 600 yards for nearly 50 years but deer are apparently much tougher than your average soldier wearing a leather trench coat and metal helmet
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar. I never said half the stuff people said I did-Albert Einstein You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin |
April 9, 2014, 12:33 AM | #52 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 8,249
|
Quote:
As far as pistols that deliver 2000 ft-lbs of energy at close range I'd like you to name one other than a 500 S&W that carries that much energy past 25 yards and that isn't based off of or shooting a rifle cartridge and fired from a single shot pistol? Not every state that you can hunt elk in allows sabots for ML hunting, Colorado, Oregon, and Idaho don't. However, realistically even a 225-250 grain saboted .35 caliber bullet isn't going to have 2000 ft-lbs much past 100 yards. I never even mentioned shotguns, but what saboted slug will carry 2000 ft-lbs to 75 yds?
__________________
NRA Life Member |
|
April 9, 2014, 07:08 AM | #53 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Rainbow City, Alabama
Posts: 7,167
|
Quote:
In hunting, the quicker the kill the better. |
|
April 9, 2014, 11:16 AM | #54 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 8,249
|
Doyle, while I won't deny that for the average soldier a wounding shot is as good as a kill. However, for the sniper as referenced by the OP they are trained to kill and not wound. So the OP has a valid point of the 06 being used as a sniper cartridge to 600 and beyond.
__________________
NRA Life Member |
April 9, 2014, 11:29 AM | #55 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Rainbow City, Alabama
Posts: 7,167
|
Taylor, it is still really apples to oranges. While a sniper does intend to kill, a human is physically incapable of running 200 yds in a matter of just a few seconds even healthy, much less wounded. A mortally wounded deer can easily do that and more.
|
April 9, 2014, 11:39 AM | #56 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 7,839
|
there's also the difference between a FMJ against people and a bullet designed to inflict maximum damage for hunting.
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar. I never said half the stuff people said I did-Albert Einstein You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin |
April 9, 2014, 11:29 PM | #57 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 8,249
|
Quote:
__________________
NRA Life Member |
|
April 9, 2014, 11:30 PM | #58 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 27, 2014
Location: southeastern Vermont,USA
Posts: 325
|
@taylorce1
if you interprited my post that way then you did not read. i did not say anything about energy and pressure being the same. i have real world experiece. concervative estimates on rifle shooting are not meant to be taken completly literaly but as a guideline to those new to reloading. read my post before you defame my charactor |
April 10, 2014, 07:24 AM | #59 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Rainbow City, Alabama
Posts: 7,167
|
Quote:
|
|
April 10, 2014, 08:16 AM | #60 |
Member
Join Date: September 29, 2011
Posts: 56
|
I'm thinking the 140gr bullets in 6.5 would penetrate deeper but I think the caliber would be fine for elk
|
April 10, 2014, 08:16 AM | #61 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 27, 2014
Location: southeastern Vermont,USA
Posts: 325
|
see that it what is great about my "so called" silly over concervative estimates.
one does not need to argue back and forth about the complex physics of bullistics.my range calculations take doubt out of the picture and you always know for sure a gun proxy range. im putting into the vermont moose lottery this year and i view my 6.5-55 as good for 250 yards on moose.some thing people say about the gun ranges on this forum may be true.but i would rather be safe then sorry |
April 10, 2014, 01:00 PM | #62 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 7,839
|
on the opposite side of that coin, one could cite the thousands of hunters that think that just because they have a heavy bullet travelling really fast that they don't have to worry as much about shot placement. I am ashamed to admit it but I've lost deer that were hit with a 300 weatherby magnum at 100 yards, for whatever reason I messed up and the animal got away, though considering the amount of blood probably got away. that was the last animal that I've wounded and lost because that was what forced me to start thinking long and hard before I pull the trigger in a less than "acceptable" situation. overly adequate cartridges are no substitute for marksmanship and good judgement.
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar. I never said half the stuff people said I did-Albert Einstein You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin |
April 10, 2014, 02:13 PM | #63 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 8,249
|
Leave it to the guys from MS and VT to harp the loudest about hunting elk.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
NRA Life Member Last edited by taylorce1; April 11, 2014 at 11:57 AM. Reason: spelling |
|||
April 10, 2014, 04:18 PM | #64 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 30, 2010
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,337
|
Simply put a good quality bullet designed for the task i.e. hunting bullet to match the cartridge and game etc., through the lungs and preferably out the other side, let lots of blood out and air in. Take pictures and post on TFL.
|
April 10, 2014, 06:19 PM | #65 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 6, 2011
Location: Thornton, Texas
Posts: 3,998
|
All this back and forth discussion on the right bullet and 'pressure' and hydrostatic shock, which don't matter for beans if the shot placement is poor. If the OP is a decent shot, then use a good bullet and place it carefully and it's done. I still say I'd use the Partition and only take shots at a reasonable distance (not over 300 is what I'd suggest).
|
April 11, 2014, 09:35 PM | #66 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 7,839
|
well, did some testing with the Etip today, not a lot of penetration and alright expansion at close range but nothing that I would want to add any range onto, I guess I'll try something in the 130gr range.
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar. I never said half the stuff people said I did-Albert Einstein You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin |
April 11, 2014, 10:00 PM | #67 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 8,249
|
What did you use for test media? Rifle Shooter magazine recently tested .30 caliber premium bullets and believe it or not most penetrate a little better at longer ranges than 100 yards. So I wouldn't be discouraged by the E-Tip just yet, but I do still think the Partition would be a better choice if using a premium bullet.
__________________
NRA Life Member |
April 11, 2014, 10:33 PM | #68 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
That's a great test, very interesting. I just wish they had a sample size of more than one. Still, the point is pretty well proven that modern bullets are remarkable. (I'll stick with the TTSX, myself.)
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
April 11, 2014, 11:06 PM | #69 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 8,249
|
I thought it was a good test too, and wished they had a larger sampling as well. I rarely need a premium bullet, but my first choice for them is usually Nosler. I tried a few of the old X bullets from Barnes and didn't like them, I know the TSX & TTSX are supposed to be better but I've had such great luck with Nosler I don't see a need to change.
__________________
NRA Life Member |
April 11, 2014, 11:17 PM | #70 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 7,839
|
believe it or not , I've found that firing at a water bottle in front of a tamarack round gives a pretty good idea of how the bullet will behave at 100 yards. I don't know what it is about those two but 6 inches into the wood translates to about 9 inches on game(roughly 50 percent increase), with nearly identical expansion. this bullet expanded to about the size of a penny but only made it about 3 inches into the wood meaning 4.5 inches roughly estimated tissue penetration. I may try some heavier stuff just to see if I can get better penetration from it. I have some 129gr partitions but only a few and nobody ever seems to have more in stock.
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar. I never said half the stuff people said I did-Albert Einstein You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin |
April 11, 2014, 11:43 PM | #71 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 8,249
|
You probably have 125's as you'll never find a 129 grain partition bullet in 6.5mm since they don't make them.
__________________
NRA Life Member |
April 12, 2014, 12:16 AM | #72 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 7,839
|
apparently they are a discontinued model because the box says 129gr, it is an older style box, probably 15-20 years old.
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar. I never said half the stuff people said I did-Albert Einstein You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin |
April 13, 2014, 02:27 AM | #73 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 27, 2014
Location: southeastern Vermont,USA
Posts: 325
|
god i forgot the name but i just ordered from midsouth the new Sierra bonded hollow point 130gr gameking.
it should be right there on midsouths website. it is 130gr bullet similar to the nosler accubond giving better penetration than a gameking or pro hunter |
April 13, 2014, 04:42 AM | #74 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 8,249
|
Quote:
__________________
NRA Life Member |
|
April 13, 2014, 06:56 AM | #75 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 27, 2014
Location: southeastern Vermont,USA
Posts: 325
|
sierra BTHP 130 grain 6.5mm is in stock at midsouth shooting suplies and i just looked it up a minute ago.
i clicked on the in stock only selection on the search select.it is a tougher bullet than a traditional game king or pro hunter,i dont know if its as tough as the accubond or swift scirocco if a person is looking to mock every post you make they can usually find some hyper technicality to do it with |
|
|