|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 22, 2012, 01:58 PM | #26 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 16, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,343
|
Rurak is right!
|
July 22, 2012, 02:23 PM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 22, 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 209
|
Hmm very good question. I would say no but then again he is firing on you with what i guess would be called a cheap suppressing fire. But then again he fled. This is a very posing question.
|
July 22, 2012, 06:21 PM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 12, 2005
Posts: 2,536
|
Yep, gas peddle time, screw the light.
|
July 23, 2012, 07:03 AM | #29 |
Member
Join Date: November 12, 2011
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 48
|
As always, I feel if you can avoid shooting someone, you should do just that.
But each situation is different. If the guy was just running away, just let him go. But, in this case, he essentially is running around and shooting randomly (albeit in a specific direction). If I saw just this action I feel I would have a justification to use deadly force. Knowing full well that there will be a defense attorney in my future
__________________
NRA Life Member | NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle & Shotgun Instructor | NRA Chief Range Safety Officer ".. a government and its agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any particular individual citizen..." - Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 (D.C. App.181) |
|
|