|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 5, 2007, 07:53 PM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: January 14, 2005
Posts: 10
|
conical bullets for .36 Navy
I just got a new Lee conical bullet mold for .375 130 gr. bullets. They sure come out pretty, but it seems they are a bit tall to load through the pistol frame. so I am guessing a separate loading press is the answer.... any advice would be much appreciated.
|
December 5, 2007, 10:43 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 16, 2007
Posts: 257
|
just going from memory here, but I think those conicals were meant to be loaded with a separate tool and were usually in the form of combustible cartridges. I don't think they did much loading of conicals out in the field.
Some people say they got poor accuracy with conicals but if you can seat them perfectly straight then your accuracy should be good. |
December 6, 2007, 12:37 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: November 13, 2007
Posts: 84
|
Navy conicals
I have cast the same bullet and never had a problem loading them. Also had good accuracy. The only problem I had was with the heavier bullet the caps would blow back causing caps in the works. I have changed nipples but have not tried the conicals yet. But the new nipples have eliminated the cap problems with round balls. Gus
|
December 6, 2007, 05:02 AM | #4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: January 14, 2005
Posts: 10
|
i have seen the cylinder loading tool before. yes, i dont think they shot these much out in the field just because the round ball is so much easier to load. i am just looking for a little more umph upon the steel target. thanks.
|
December 6, 2007, 05:46 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,190
|
All military ammo was paper cartridges loaded with conicals.
|
|
|