|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 29, 2012, 03:48 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 17, 2002
Posts: 221
|
What’s wrong with the finish of this Taurus 85UL?
This 85UL is for sale in my country (not the U.S.). It is supposed to be as new, but its finish is far from be as good as new.
Barrel and cylinder are perfect, but the frame shows some areas with faulty finish, as shown in the pics. What could be the causes of these defects? Thanks for your help. |
September 29, 2012, 04:13 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 27, 2007
Posts: 5,261
|
Is that stainless or nickle?
Body salt can cause corrosion. Maybe the frame was not throughly cleaned or polished after drop forging and surface corrosion occurred between fitting stations.
__________________
If I'm not shooting, I'm reloading. |
September 29, 2012, 05:08 PM | #3 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: October 12, 2002
Location: The same state as Mordor.
Posts: 5,569
|
Quote:
Taurus' normal matte finish looks better than that -- finer and more even. There's also a turn ring, and an aftermarket grip (looks like Pachmayr (which is a plus)). I don't think this thing is new. Quote:
BTW, look at the first, second and fourth pics. Notice the hole that the grip only half covers. That's there to aid in taking off the sideplate without damage. Remove the sideplate screws, then run a cleaning rod through that hole and tap tap tap gently to help ease the side plate off. It's curious that the grip doesn't properly cover that hole. Is it the correct grip? Is it correctly mounted to the gun? Unfortunately I don't have a Pachmayr grip anymore for my Taurus snub, that I could check how that fits and if it normally covers that hole. Oh, and on top of all that, the cylinder latch is the old style. Check the hammer to see if it has Taurus' hammer mounted internal lock? Anything that came out of Taurus USA for the last few years would have that.
__________________
"As was the man of dust, so also are those who are of the dust, and as is the man of heaven, so also are those who are of heaven. Just as we have borne the image of the man of dust, we shall also bear the image of the man of heaven. " Last edited by lee n. field; September 29, 2012 at 05:30 PM. |
||
September 29, 2012, 05:24 PM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 3, 2009
Location: Not close enough to the beach
Posts: 1,477
|
Quote:
|
|
September 29, 2012, 06:25 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 19, 2010
Location: a little north of Dallas
Posts: 124
|
When I saw it my first thought was that someone had tried to make it look like stainless steel by using a chemical stripper to remove the blue finish and the stripper had etched the alloy frame.
You can check the serial number at this link and it will tell you how old it is and the model number will indicate if it really is stainless or blue. If it is stainless, then I agree with Old Bear, bad casting. http://www.taurususa.com/find-model.cfm Note: You must click the "search" button at that link. "Enter" key won't make it search.
__________________
Wish I didn't know now what I didn't know then. |
September 29, 2012, 06:26 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 17, 2002
Posts: 221
|
It is a Taurus 85 UL. Aluminum frame, with stainless steel cylinder and barrel.
Taurus USA says it was made in 2002. It has Taurus' hammer mounted internal lock Grip is Pachmayr (put it just to compare with the original), made for S&W J frames, that's why it doesn't cover the hole. I was afraid that bad casting could be the cause of the problems ... Too bad cause I like the light weight and the looks, although I haven't fired it yet... and won't do it - thanks old bear Last edited by Ignacio49; September 29, 2012 at 06:31 PM. |
September 29, 2012, 09:01 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 12, 2002
Location: The same state as Mordor.
Posts: 5,569
|
I did a little g00gle-ing to see if sweat could cause effects like what is pictured there.
Maybe. Here are two different threads with pics of S&W Airweight snubs that started to look nasty from sweat. http://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=241718 http://www.okshooters.com/showthread...ter-Exercising Would I buy the gun pictured? Maybe, but I'd want to look it over very closely, and would pay nothing close to "as new" price. The chewed up screw on the cylinder latch is a sign of maybe a history of amateur gunsmithing inflicted.
__________________
"As was the man of dust, so also are those who are of the dust, and as is the man of heaven, so also are those who are of heaven. Just as we have borne the image of the man of dust, we shall also bear the image of the man of heaven. " |
September 29, 2012, 09:04 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 9, 2011
Location: Land of the Free
Posts: 2,834
|
I take it-this is the only one you seen in a while to be considering it? What country? Maybe wait for another one?
Maybe in the shipping to your country it wasn't oiled well and the finish is flaking off? But if it is "NEW" like you say, why the broken/not fitting grips and where is Taurus factory grips. Does your country have weird import law where the grip has to be made in x country? |
September 29, 2012, 09:43 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 1, 2012
Posts: 137
|
A Friend of mine has higher than normal acidic skin oils. Blued guns would eventually rub off if he sweated a lot while handling them. He would normally shoot and work using gloves (while on duty). He eventually had to buy a stainless steel firearm.
But nothing like that.
__________________
CZ82, S&W Mod. 65 .357, Marlin 22mn (22WMR), Mossberg 500. |
September 29, 2012, 10:06 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 7, 2001
Location: Washington State
Posts: 2,166
|
There are a number of areas of concern there.
Starting with picture #1: a. The cylinder latch screw is messed up. This means that an improper screwdriver was used, and the slot suffered damage as a result. A hallmark of sloppy work. b. (POTENTIAL MAJOR PROBLEM) Picture #2: Note the dissimilar finish on the metal of the frame and the cylinder. This is an indication that the cylinder might, at some point, have been replaced. c. (All pictures) There is extensive pitting on that frame. This appears to have been cleaned up, then painted over or plated. d. Picture #3: Take a look at the sideplate. You'll notice that it appears to be mismatched with the frame--there is a visual difference in the fit of the sideplate to the frame. This is possibly a replacement sideplate. e. Picture #4: Note the discoloration. This is indication of a serious problem with corrosion. Finally, note the blurring of the rollmarks and stamps. This means that some metal refinishing was done with little regard for the outward finish. Personally, I would avoid this revolver like the plague. There are too many things visibly wrong with it--who knows what the inside looks like? Don't buy it.
__________________
Hiding in plain sight... |
September 29, 2012, 10:09 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
Powderman, I mostly agree with you, except for b.
I don't know of any revolvers that use aluminum cylinders; so, the metals had better not be the same between frame and cylinder on this Ultralite. Edit: even given same color coating, aluminum and steel parts tend to look different. |
September 29, 2012, 10:29 PM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 9, 2011
Location: Land of the Free
Posts: 2,834
|
Quote:
Disagree on B, because my S&W J frame cylinder is different color than my frame. The cylinder+barrel are the same coating/color SS, while the finish on the frame/grip area is different. I image the Barrel/Cylinder have a better finish to hold up against firing/wiping down that area more so with cleaners. |
|
September 29, 2012, 11:53 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 17, 2002
Posts: 221
|
Ref some comments concerning grips and dissimilar colors, please read my second post:
"It is a Taurus 85 UL. Aluminum frame, with stainless steel cylinder and barrel. Taurus USA says it was made in 2002. It has Taurus' hammer mounted internal lock. Grip is Pachmayr (put it just to compare with the original), made for S&W J frames, that's why it doesn't cover the hole." By the way, I am not sure if frame is aluminum alloy or just aluminum. lee n. field: difficult to say by just looking at the pics, but the damage from sweat shown in the threads seem to me to be different from what I see in "my" 85 - mine looks more like a finish problem, except last two pics that show a different type of damage - probably aluminum oxide. This gun has been stored for 9-10 years. Maybe humidity caused the problems. |
September 30, 2012, 06:44 AM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 12, 2006
Location: NKY
Posts: 12,463
|
Quote:
Otherwise, I agree, stay away. It looks used but if it is new, even for Taurus that gun looks bad.
__________________
"He who laughs last, laughs dead." Homer Simpson |
|
September 30, 2012, 07:17 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 25, 2010
Posts: 174
|
It is a cobbled together nightmare designed for a quick sale to an unknowledgeable buyer.
Even criminals in America have nicer guns than this. Don't buy it. |
September 30, 2012, 04:22 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2008
Posts: 11,132
|
Along with the ugly finish, turn line and bad casting, "Bubba" has taken a screwdriver to that gun. Just look at the screw on the Cylinder release. If the action appeared to work on that gun, I'd pay about $80 for it.
|
September 30, 2012, 05:52 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 20, 2005
Posts: 2,474
|
Some of the marks near the hammer / side plate look like what happens when you put too much force on something you are wire brushing. I suspect maybe it has been wire brushed or otherwise messed with to remove or restore finish?
I agree stay away. Far away given it's an aluminum frame. You can do many things to steel or stainless that are either fixable, or ugly but harmless as to strength. Alloy is a whole other ball of wax as to messing up the material properties or setting it up for it to oxidize away quickly if someone really messed up the finish. |
October 2, 2012, 08:36 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 15, 2006
Posts: 434
|
Looks like a fire/salvage.
If you have already bought it,sorry.If not,don't. |
October 2, 2012, 05:00 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 14, 2004
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 6,117
|
a. The cylinder latch screw is messed up. This means that an improper screwdriver was used, and the slot suffered damage as a result. A hallmark of sloppy work.
I disagree with part of your statement. I have a 445 that had never been dissembled when I bought it and the screw looked much like that one. From the factory |
October 3, 2012, 08:02 AM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 14, 2009
Location: Sunshine and Keystone States
Posts: 4,461
|
Quote:
|
|
October 3, 2012, 08:11 AM | #21 | ||
Junior member
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: All the way to NEBRASKA
Posts: 8,722
|
Quote:
Quote:
Run. |
||
October 3, 2012, 04:21 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 14, 2004
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 6,117
|
Sorry, didn’t mean to imply you were wrong, just that it wasn’t just somebody, it was the factory that used an incorrect tool.
__________________
It was a sad day when I discovered my universal remote control did not in fact control the universe. Did you hear about the latest study.....5 out of 6 liberals say that Russian Roulette is safe. |
October 3, 2012, 11:38 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 9, 2011
Location: Land of the Free
Posts: 2,834
|
are you buying this from private sale or a gun dealer shop in your country? if a gun dealer shop and they list it as "new" then they are scamming you.
|
|
|