The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Revolver Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old March 19, 2018, 07:16 AM   #1
In The Ten Ring
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 26, 2018
Posts: 380
+P in newer vs. older S&W Airweights.

Why are the newer Airweights such as the S&W 438 and 638 +P rated while the older Model 38's aren't?

What has been done to the aluminum frames to allow this?
In The Ten Ring is offline  
Old March 19, 2018, 01:03 PM   #2
T. O'Heir
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
There was no SAAMI standard for what '+P' means until relatively recently. The "P" in +P meaning pressure.
However, it's not terribly difficult to beef up the alloy of Al. Al is used for light tank and AFV armour now.
__________________
Spelling and grammar count!
T. O'Heir is offline  
Old March 19, 2018, 02:17 PM   #3
Slamfire
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 27, 2007
Posts: 5,261
Only S&W can answer if the non +P revolvers are safe with +P loads, and they might not be. All depends on the steel alloys and the heat treatments.

As for the later Airweights, do understand, a continuous diet of +P will accelerate wear on an Airweight. I don't know the limits, but you can expect the timing to be affected, maybe the extractor star to get loose, maybe the hand to batter. No firearm is built to last forever, and these lightweight pistols are designed to be carried a lot, but shot a little. If you want the maximum lifetime out of an Airweight, for practice, shoot standard pressure loads, and load up the +P for self defense.

__________________
If I'm not shooting, I'm reloading.
Slamfire is offline  
Old March 19, 2018, 02:37 PM   #4
Nick_C_S
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 21, 2013
Location: Idaho
Posts: 5,523
Quote:
Only S&W can answer if the non +P revolvers are safe with +P loads
I agree. I have a Model 60 (steel J-frame snubby) I purchased new in 1984. Just a few years ago, I called S&W and asked them specifically about +P ammo. The answer was basically "all of our steel J-frames can safely shoot +P ammo." In 1984, "+P" didn't have a specific definition; otherwise, my gun probably would have been stamped as such on the barrel.

Just speaking for myself, with alloy frames, I'd shoot +P's only occasionally - even if Smith deemed it safe.
__________________
Gun control laws benefit only criminals and politicians - but then, I repeat myself.
Life Member, National Rifle Association
Nick_C_S is offline  
Old March 19, 2018, 03:46 PM   #5
JERRYS.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 23, 2013
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,969
whats already been said above.

next, I find that +p generally doesn't offer me better performance (in back yard water jug tests) but it does offer me slower follow up shots. when I rip off a cylinder full as fast as I can with standard and +p I find that my +p groups are noticeably larger at 7 yards. in other words, (for me) to shoot as good a group with +p as I do standard pressure I have to shoot a little slower.

is that a good trade off for you? I do not have a ported airweight. I do have a ported 640 no dash .357 and it makes a huge difference in speed shooting.
JERRYS. is offline  
Old March 19, 2018, 04:40 PM   #6
bn12gg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 19, 2011
Location: Winter Park, Florida
Posts: 470
For putting holes in paper plates with my SW 37 or Cobra I prefer wadcutters.

.02

David.
bn12gg is offline  
Old March 19, 2018, 08:15 PM   #7
straightshooterjake
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 7, 2016
Posts: 122
The modern +P rated airweight J-frames are quite tough. I shoot them quite a bit, and they do not loosen up or go out of time easily. I have over 3,000 rounds through one of them, and it has not had any problems. I shoot mostly standard pressure rounds, but I do shoot +P when I feel like it, and it does not cause any issues.

The older airweight guns are a different story. They have a reputation for cracking the frames right under where the barrel screws in. I would only shoot one with standard pressure ammo, and probably pretty sparingly. I would not shoot one on a very frequent basis like I do with a modern 642.
__________________
My blog: http://straightshooterjake.blogspot.com/
straightshooterjake is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.04562 seconds with 10 queries