|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 19, 2018, 07:16 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 26, 2018
Posts: 380
|
+P in newer vs. older S&W Airweights.
Why are the newer Airweights such as the S&W 438 and 638 +P rated while the older Model 38's aren't?
What has been done to the aluminum frames to allow this? |
March 19, 2018, 01:03 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
|
There was no SAAMI standard for what '+P' means until relatively recently. The "P" in +P meaning pressure.
However, it's not terribly difficult to beef up the alloy of Al. Al is used for light tank and AFV armour now.
__________________
Spelling and grammar count! |
March 19, 2018, 02:17 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 27, 2007
Posts: 5,261
|
Only S&W can answer if the non +P revolvers are safe with +P loads, and they might not be. All depends on the steel alloys and the heat treatments.
As for the later Airweights, do understand, a continuous diet of +P will accelerate wear on an Airweight. I don't know the limits, but you can expect the timing to be affected, maybe the extractor star to get loose, maybe the hand to batter. No firearm is built to last forever, and these lightweight pistols are designed to be carried a lot, but shot a little. If you want the maximum lifetime out of an Airweight, for practice, shoot standard pressure loads, and load up the +P for self defense.
__________________
If I'm not shooting, I'm reloading. |
March 19, 2018, 02:37 PM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 21, 2013
Location: Idaho
Posts: 5,523
|
Quote:
Just speaking for myself, with alloy frames, I'd shoot +P's only occasionally - even if Smith deemed it safe.
__________________
Gun control laws benefit only criminals and politicians - but then, I repeat myself. Life Member, National Rifle Association |
|
March 19, 2018, 03:46 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 23, 2013
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,969
|
whats already been said above.
next, I find that +p generally doesn't offer me better performance (in back yard water jug tests) but it does offer me slower follow up shots. when I rip off a cylinder full as fast as I can with standard and +p I find that my +p groups are noticeably larger at 7 yards. in other words, (for me) to shoot as good a group with +p as I do standard pressure I have to shoot a little slower. is that a good trade off for you? I do not have a ported airweight. I do have a ported 640 no dash .357 and it makes a huge difference in speed shooting. |
March 19, 2018, 04:40 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 19, 2011
Location: Winter Park, Florida
Posts: 470
|
For putting holes in paper plates with my SW 37 or Cobra I prefer wadcutters.
.02 David. |
March 19, 2018, 08:15 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 7, 2016
Posts: 122
|
The modern +P rated airweight J-frames are quite tough. I shoot them quite a bit, and they do not loosen up or go out of time easily. I have over 3,000 rounds through one of them, and it has not had any problems. I shoot mostly standard pressure rounds, but I do shoot +P when I feel like it, and it does not cause any issues.
The older airweight guns are a different story. They have a reputation for cracking the frames right under where the barrel screws in. I would only shoot one with standard pressure ammo, and probably pretty sparingly. I would not shoot one on a very frequent basis like I do with a modern 642.
__________________
My blog: http://straightshooterjake.blogspot.com/ |
|
|