The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > Law and Civil Rights

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old October 14, 2008, 03:03 AM   #1
Bill Akins
Senior Member
Join Date: August 28, 2007
Location: Hudson, Florida
Posts: 1,130
Akins vs ATF federal district court pleadings & briefs

I was unable to post this at the legal/civil rights forum section.

The below has just been released to various 2nd amendment and firearm sites (along with this one) online.

There have been numerous inaccuracies online regarding the recent federal district court order granting the ATF's motion to dismiss my case without hearing it. Until now, people have only had access to and read the federal district court's order and have not seen all the briefs and pleadings regarding the case and therefore could not possibly understand the case and its issues.

In my continuing effort to inform former customers, supporters of the 2nd amendment and the firearms community at large, I have asked my attorney John Monroe to post and make available a link to all briefs and pleadings concerning the case. There is much I would like to be able to say, but since we are appealing the case to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, I cannot answer any questions nor comment on any particulars of the case at this time. All the briefs and pleadings for the federal district court case are contained in the below link with the exception of over 160 pages of discovery information of which many of the pertinent points are covered in the briefs and pleadings. All people have to do is read it. Hopefully this will clear up any misconceptions and misinformation currently existing online. Please feel free to disburse this at your website or any online site. Here is the link....

Sincerely, Bill Akins
Bill Akins is offline  
Old October 14, 2008, 03:16 AM   #2
B. Lahey
Senior Member
Join Date: March 17, 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,857
Good luck, hope you win.
B. Lahey is offline  
Old October 14, 2008, 08:27 AM   #3
Bud Helms
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: December 31, 1999
Location: Middle Georgia
Posts: 13,155
Yes, thanks, Bill.

We are tagging all the 2nd Amendment and CCW related threads posted here for transfer to the new L&CR forum for when and if it opens to the public. For now, if you don't have access to L&CR, here in General is fine.
"The irony of the Information Age is that it has given new respectability to uninformed opinion." - John Lawton, speaking to the American Association of Broadcast Journalists in 1995
Bud Helms is offline  
Old October 14, 2008, 09:55 AM   #4
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: March 11, 2000
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 15,982
Good luck, Bill!

They definitely done you dirt.
2% Unobtainium, 98% Hypetanium.
The Arms Room: An Online Museum.
Tamara is offline  
Old October 14, 2008, 03:39 PM   #5
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 1999
Location: Albuquerque, NM, USA
Posts: 2,541
Good luck with the appeal.
Erich is offline  
Old October 14, 2008, 03:48 PM   #6
Junior member
Join Date: September 28, 2005
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 6,465
I wish Mr. Akins all the best and great success in his appeals process, and I want one (or several) of his product designs...

But somehow I think the only outcome we'll see will be Heller used against us as its first significant precedent, since this is most definitely not an arms design in common use and therefore not protected under the 2A.

Much like Miller has been used against us for decades, a decision that is predominantly pro-2A will be warped to strangle us slowly.

Feeling dark today...
azredhawk44 is offline  
Old October 14, 2008, 05:10 PM   #7
Junior member
Join Date: November 25, 2002
Location: In my own little weird world in Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 14,172
I predict that the decision of the District Court will be upheld on appeal

WildandireaditallAlaska ™
Wildalaska is offline  
Old October 16, 2008, 09:16 AM   #8
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2007
Location: In the oak studded hills near Napa
Posts: 2,203
Akin’s automatic “bump-fire” device is certainly ingenious in that it circumvents the “single pull” concept, but I’m shocked that he actually expected something other than what he’s getting from the courts. I (unlike WA) did not read much past the complaint and the defendant’s motion to dismiss, but I don’t remember seeing if or how many of the devices were actually sold. If some were sold, what happens to the poor schmucks that bought them?
grymster2007 is offline  

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2018 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent:
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.05835 seconds with 10 queries