The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: Bolt, Lever, and Pump Action

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old October 22, 2019, 12:10 AM   #26
Mycin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 20, 2015
Location: North Texas
Posts: 104
BTW, the Point Blank Range calculator at that web site calculates maximum PBR for a 4" target with that cartridge is 188 yards with a near zero range of 24 yards (zero it at 24 yards and it should hit within plus or minus 2" out to 188 yards).

http://www.shooterscalculator.com/po...90&sh=1.5&ts=4
Mycin is offline  
Old October 22, 2019, 12:19 AM   #27
Ernie Bishop
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 21, 2019
Posts: 122
It will all come down to your ability to keep it in the kill zone when shooting from hunting positions under stress.
Ernie Bishop is offline  
Old October 25, 2019, 07:39 PM   #28
Longshot4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 22, 2014
Posts: 868
It's a 30-30 get rid of the scope. learn the sights. That's hunting 101. The next rifle bolt action. Then get a scope. I ounce met a young guy that just bought a Marlin 30-30 and he put a scope on it and with a iron sight set of rings. I suggested get rid of the scope. He was mad. Oh well. The next day a nice buck came bounding through the woods and jumped right over him. He tried to shoot him at 4'. Heck he didn't have a chance with all those gizmos. Couldn't see and couldn't decide what to use. Dump the scope.

Last edited by Longshot4; October 25, 2019 at 07:49 PM.
Longshot4 is offline  
Old October 25, 2019, 07:55 PM   #29
Doyle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Rainbow City, Alabama
Posts: 7,167
Quote:
It's a 30-30 get rid of the scope. learn the sights. That's hunting 101. The next rifle bolt action. Then get a scope. I ounce met a young guy that just bought a Marlin 30-30 and he put a scope on it and with a iron sight set of rings. I suggested get rid of the scope. He was mad. Oh well. The next day a nice buck came bounding through the woods and jumped right over him. He tried to shoot him at 4'. Heck he didn't have a chance with all those gizmos. Couldn't see and couldn't decide what to use. Dump the scope.
Going scopeless worked just fine when I was 30. Now that I'm 60 - forget it. Just wait until you get old.
Doyle is offline  
Old October 25, 2019, 08:01 PM   #30
Longshot4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 22, 2014
Posts: 868
Oh I might have missed some thing. Using a scope from a worm blind. Yea sure. I don't recall the power of the scope. How about a red dot. Fast and all you do is put the dot on the target. No front and rear sight to line up.
Longshot4 is offline  
Old October 25, 2019, 09:52 PM   #31
Doyle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Rainbow City, Alabama
Posts: 7,167
I'm not a huge fan of red-dots for hunting. For one, a dot that is the right sized for a 100 yd shot will look huge on a 20 yd shot. Conversely, one that is the right size for a close shot will look very tiny at distance. Also, Murphy's law will catch up to you. You'll be in the blind and the buck of a lifetime will show up just when your red dot decides to die.

My own preference for a short and light rifle like a lever 30-30 is a lightweight 2-7 power scope. In fact, I've just put another Leupold like that on order yesterday to go on a backup rifle. At just under 12 oz, it won't unbalance your light rifle. When you are in a short-distance stand, keeping it set at 2x means that the only thing you won't be able to see is a VERY short-distance running deer - something it would be unethical to try and shoot anyway.
Doyle is offline  
Old October 26, 2019, 11:24 AM   #32
Don Fischer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 2, 2017
Posts: 1,868
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doyle View Post
I'm not a huge fan of red-dots for hunting. For one, a dot that is the right sized for a 100 yd shot will look huge on a 20 yd shot. Conversely, one that is the right size for a close shot will look very tiny at distance. Also, Murphy's law will catch up to you. You'll be in the blind and the buck of a lifetime will show up just when your red dot decides to die.

My own preference for a short and light rifle like a lever 30-30 is a lightweight 2-7 power scope. In fact, I've just put another Leupold like that on order yesterday to go on a backup rifle. At just under 12 oz, it won't unbalance your light rifle. When you are in a short-distance stand, keeping it set at 2x means that the only thing you won't be able to see is a VERY short-distance running deer - something it would be unethical to try and shoot anyway.
I don't know where you'd get them anymore but my favorite rifle scope combo for yers was a Rem 660 with a 2 3/4x Redfield. Have a 308 now I've only sht cast in and it has a 1-4x Redfield. For hunting, I really like low power scope's. Yet easiest to find are 3-9x! I do have two new Redfield/Leupold's in 2-7x for hunting and do like them!
Don Fischer is offline  
Old October 26, 2019, 11:28 AM   #33
Ernie Bishop
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 21, 2019
Posts: 122
musicmatty,
Use the optic you want to use...Don't worry about others opinions.
Your rifle and your money.
Whatever you use, become proficient with it from the type of field rest you will use for hunting and enjoy yourself
Ernie Bishop is offline  
Old October 26, 2019, 12:20 PM   #34
musicmatty
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 30, 2009
Location: Eastcoast
Posts: 346
Problem solved. I was able to get 100 yard shot at the target and had virtually no drop after sighting in at 50 yards. The biggest factor here is probably the way the shooter See’s the the target with regards to dropping a quarter inch or half-inch or even an inch with this particular cartridge, I feel confident to say beyond 120 yards on out, that real compensation has to start being factored in.

What has me puzzled is this… After taking the rifle completely apart after last year‘s hunting season and giving it a deep cleaning, it definitely change the elevation of the scope after reassembling. Even though the scope was never removed from the barrel, the elevation had somehow changed causing it to shoot several inches high.

We all know that you’re never supposed to go back and torque down the screws in the mounting rings as that will pull the scope all out of alignment. I’m thinking more than anything, it had to be the big screw that sinks down through the tang in to the rear butt of the gun and that is what change the elevation. After reassembling and torquing that big screw back down through the tang, it must’ve change the elevation of the way the scope was sitting on the rifle.
musicmatty is offline  
Old October 26, 2019, 12:23 PM   #35
Ernie Bishop
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 21, 2019
Posts: 122
Awesome Possum!
Ernie Bishop is offline  
Old October 26, 2019, 12:28 PM   #36
Don Fischer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 2, 2017
Posts: 1,868
Quote:
Originally Posted by musicmatty View Post
Problem solved. I was able to get 100 yard shot at the target and had virtually no drop after sighting in at 50 yards. The biggest factor here is probably the way the shooter See’s the the target with regards to dropping a quarter inch or half-inch or even an inch with this particular cartridge, I feel confident to say beyond 120 yards on out, that real compensation has to start being factored in.

What has me puzzled is this… After taking the rifle completely apart after last year‘s hunting season and giving it a deep cleaning, it definitely change the elevation of the scope after reassembling. Even though the scope was never removed from the barrel, the elevation had somehow changed causing it to shoot several inches high.

We all know that you’re never supposed to go back and torque down the screws in the mounting rings as that will pull the scope all out of alignment. I’m thinking more than anything, it had to be the big screw that sinks down through the tang in to the rear butt of the gun and that is what change the elevation. After reassembling and torquing that big screw back down through the tang, it must’ve change the elevation of the way the scope was sitting on the rifle.
If that rear tang screw is your problem, then you have an action bedding problem. Tighten both action screws down. Then loosen the front screw slowly while watching the action just in front of it or even the barrel at the front of the stock. You see any movement at all and your action needs bedded.
Don Fischer is offline  
Old October 26, 2019, 01:01 PM   #37
musicmatty
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 30, 2009
Location: Eastcoast
Posts: 346
Quote:
If that rear tang screw is your problem, then you have an action bedding problem. Tighten both action screws down. Then loosen the front screw slowly while watching the action just in front of it or even the barrel at the front of the stock. You see any movement at all and your action needs bedded.
I don’t know if that was the problem… I’m just assuming. What I do know is this… Last year the rifle was dead on at 100 yards... This year it was several inches high when checking. The only thing I can think of is that something changed when I took the rifle completely apart for cleaning this past season… That’s something I haven’t done in 30 years was take this rifle completely apart.
musicmatty is offline  
Old October 26, 2019, 11:42 PM   #38
bamaranger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 9, 2009
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 8,312
zero shift

Just for conversations sake, I'd highly suspect that the two barrel bands on the M94 would be highly suspect in a zero change. bearing directly on the barrel, and tying the barrel to the forearm and mag tube would be real factors in barrel harmonics. Usually though, M94's are not really put under the microscope for accuracy......minute of venison is usually sufficient.

BTW, I've never pulled a M94 completely down, but I've heard it is a real chore.

Finally, glad Doyle chimed in about iron sights. I used to brashly state, in this forum, "no scopes on your lever carbine" and then my eyes slipped as I got older. A peep helped for a while, and I can still manage a long barreled peep sighted rifle well enough, but scopes are the way for most w/ old man eyes.

Not to sidetrack the post, but I would agree that those goofy see thru mounts that put the scope about a foot above the action, are for the birds. My Dad put them on all his scoped rifles, he didn't trust scopes, and in his era, and for all he was willing to pay for one, I suppose it made a bit of sense. But these days, a perfectly reliable, repeatable , weather proof scope can be had for less than $200 (think used Leupold 4x) and a dandy new low powered variable for a bit over.

Heck, I put a low powered variable scope on a turkey SHOTGUN this spring, and I am here to tell you without reservation it was absolutely grim death on any gobbler unlucky enough to present a shot from 10 to 50 yds.
bamaranger is offline  
Old October 27, 2019, 10:07 AM   #39
Bart B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
Years ago, a friend's favorite hunting rifle was a 30-30 Marlin lever action carbine with a Weaver 1X scope mounted as low as possible.
Bart B. is offline  
Old October 27, 2019, 11:42 AM   #40
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,543
I recall a gunzine article about "The Upside Down Rifle." A Marlin with a Zeiss scope that cost more than the gun. The ballistics and mechanical accuracy were good enough, the high end scope let the owner SEE his game in the early hours.
Jim Watson is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.08741 seconds with 8 queries