|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 17, 2019, 08:56 PM | #51 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 12,214
|
Quote:
Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk |
|
April 17, 2019, 09:03 PM | #52 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 4, 1999
Location: Rebel South USA
Posts: 2,074
|
Quote:
If EVERYTHING fails and a badguy tries to harm kids in the classroom, the armed teacher could be the last line of defense. In that circumstance, I could set aside all the other issues which make the idea of Teacher/Defender a problematic concept. Outside of that narrow circumstance, the arming of Teachers as "the plan" is counter to most everything I have ever learned about protection. It looks good on paper and it makes people feel good but its just not a competent protection plan for many reason.
__________________
Life is a web woven by necessity and chance... |
|
April 17, 2019, 09:08 PM | #53 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,458
|
Quote:
As for local architects? Let me provide an example from the real world: Several years ago the high school in my home town was planning a major addition and renovation project. $30 million worth of construction ... back when $30 was real money. Much of the money was coming from a state grant, and the rules here are that if the state funds the construction, the state gets to review the plans for code compliance. But the law only gives the state 30 days to review the plans once they've been submitted. If the state can't do it in that time, they let the local building official do it. That's what happened in my town. But it's a small town, with only one guy as the entire building department. He didn't have the time to review a $30 million construction project within a 30-day window. I'm licensed as a building inspector as well as an architect, so the town hired me to review the plans as a consultant to the building department. Fine. This was about a year or maybe two years after Columbine. Security -- and the possibility of a school shooter -- was high on everyone's list of priorities. I attended some of the public meetings on the project. The public asked about it, and the school board assured them that every effort was being made to ensure safety and security. So imagine my surprise when I opened up the plans and found that all the classrooms in the new addition were going to have glass sidelights next to the classroom doors. And not bullet-resistant glass (which is very heavy and VERY expensive), just the same tempered glass you'd find in any storefront near a door. This was not a code violation, so it was outside of my responsibility. Nonetheless, I was bothered by it enough that I went over to the police department and discussed it with the deputy chief. He agreed: "That's pretty stupid." So I took it to the school board, and they referred it to the architects. The architects' response was, "But we like it." So that's the way it was built. So I'm not impressed by mention of the superintendent, a facilities manager, or an architect. Security is a mindset, and if the players aren't committed to understanding security as opposed to paying lip service to it, they're not bringing anything worthwhile to the table. |
|
April 17, 2019, 09:11 PM | #54 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: August 31, 2002
Location: Deep in the Heart of the Lone Star State (TX)
Posts: 2,169
|
Quote:
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk |
||
April 17, 2019, 09:15 PM | #55 |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,458
|
^^^ It's that diverse perspectives part that makes me so upset that the School Shield program is only open to LEOs. There is no diversity of perspective. Of course cops don't have all the answers. Just as architects don't have all the answers. But together, cops and architects might offer a broader range of options than a team made up only of cops.
|
April 17, 2019, 09:35 PM | #56 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 12,214
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I want to roll back to something. You have a good deal of experience in architecture, obviously. That alone qualifies you to comment on physical security. Yet in that previous post you brought up your NRA instructional and shooting background. Why? You don't really need that background to comment about architecture. The reality is when it comes to this type of situation some background with firearms and application of force is sort of expected, hence, imo, why you presented additional background. Is it really that surprising that the NRA would look primarily to law enforcement for this program? While I don't doubt that physical security should be part of the equation, most schools are strapped for money as is. How many will have the money to do major renovations specifically for school shootings? My guess is this Shield program will have more to do with helping schools work with what they have and low-cost changes that might be made rather than serious remodeling.
__________________
Know the status of your weapon Keep your muzzle oriented so that no one will be hurt if the firearm discharges Keep your finger off the trigger until you have an adequate sight picture Maintain situational awareness |
|||
April 18, 2019, 07:07 AM | #57 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 4, 1999
Location: Rebel South USA
Posts: 2,074
|
Quote:
If they are limiting school shield to LEO ( 3+ years experience and up), its likely because the skill set which is paramount to the program is relative to LE training, knowledge, experience and not construction.
__________________
Life is a web woven by necessity and chance... |
|
April 18, 2019, 10:02 AM | #58 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
Where I used to work has all the glass rooms with glass walls. You could bring down shutters but the idea was an attractive open concept. I asked the building supervisior (a for real ex-SEAL) what it would take to bring down a panel. He said about 4 shots. So much for hiding. Another school was building the same type of labs and I was asked my opinion by a colleague there. I mentioned the shooter aspect. He said it was a good one but probably go nowhere vs. aesthetics.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
April 18, 2019, 11:52 AM | #59 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 15, 2016
Location: Rural PA
Posts: 1,639
|
We live in a shallow society where, often times, aesthetics takes precedence over safety and functionality. As an equipment operator and truck driver, I run into many problems with landscape architecture that make a delivery with a large vehicle nearly impossible. These things are rarely on the mind of the common architects or the people paying for the project. As long as it looks good in the drawings and for the PR photos afterward.
__________________
22lr, 20 gauge, 8mm Mauser, 35 Remington, 30-06, 5.56x45/223, 9mm, 380acp |
April 18, 2019, 12:14 PM | #60 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 22, 2016
Posts: 2,192
|
I reference it as "building monuments to themselves" when aesthetics are given unreasonable precedence (and funding) over functionality. Common around here in schools and hospitals.
Back to a couple questions that came up: What standards should teachers be required to train to and qualify for: IMO teachers seeing to carry a firearm in the classroom should follow the same yearly (or whatever) qualification standards as the minimum standard for a member of the state police force be it highway patrol or state police officer. This gives a "statewide" standard. Who should pay for it: Teachers (or a third party) should be responsible for the bill for their initial training but, once achieved and qualification kept up, the district should pay for ongoing training and qualification - again the minimal training required of officers. No the district is not paying for your trip to Gunsite (or whatever). Liability insurance: On the district. Districts foot the bill for suits pertaining to teacher and administration indiscretion all the time. This at least is intended to do some good. What is the role of the armed teacher? Defense of the classroom / immediate area only. Teachers are not to be used in some active engagement exercise to aggressively pursue and eliminate threats. The role of the armed teacher is a last ditch effort should the defensive measures of the classroom be overcome. |
April 18, 2019, 02:28 PM | #61 | ||
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,458
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
April 18, 2019, 03:23 PM | #62 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: November 4, 1999
Location: Rebel South USA
Posts: 2,074
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Life is a web woven by necessity and chance... |
||
April 18, 2019, 09:35 PM | #63 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,717
|
Well, to add insult to injury, a SRO in Alexandria, VA had a (probable) ND. The quote here is disturbing on many levels...
Quote:
Our local DFW tv news said it was while the SRO was unloading the gun, but I can't find verification for that.
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011 My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange |
|
April 18, 2019, 11:16 PM | #64 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,458
|
Quote:
Last edited by Aguila Blanca; April 19, 2019 at 10:38 AM. Reason: typo |
|
April 19, 2019, 11:03 AM | #65 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 8, 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,787
|
AB, how much training does an architect have in security issues? Is it a routine part of their schooling? And thus is it something that a licensed architect should reasonably be expected to be cognizant of in their designs for facilities such as schools?
|
April 19, 2019, 12:50 PM | #66 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,458
|
Quote:
That said, just as a doctor is expected to develop expertise beyond his M.D. degree to engage in whatever specialty he/she chooses, an architect is also expected to know about factors affecting his/her projects. The specific knowledge required for designing schools is different from that required for hospitals, or prisons, or factories, or research laboratories. That's why most clients hire larger firms for all but very small projects. When a school board hires "an architect" to design a school, they aren't really hiring "an" architect. They're hiring a firm. I've worked for two firms that do a lot of schools. There were about 50 people in each firm, with several licensed architects in each firm who pretty much specialized in just schools. That's a small firm by national standards. For comparison, Gensler has (I think) over 6,000 employees, in multiple offices around the country. I currently work for a mid-size A/E (architecture/engineering) firm that has about 500 employees spread over five regional offices. But, even then, there's the question of priorities. Most architecture schools stress design as THE item of paramount importance. In the example I cited of the glass sidelights next to the classroom doors, even after it was pointed out that the sidelights created a security problem the lead architect for the project wanted to keep it because he liked it. He said some clap-trap about creating a "sense of openness and transparency" in the classrooms. Nonsense. This is the same high school I attended. The classrooms all had windows, and the new classrooms have windows. The classrooms in the old wings of the school, when I was there, didn't have glass sidelights, and nobody cared. Most of the teachers left the door to the corridor open anyway, which would have (a) blocked the sidelight, and (b) left a larger opening than the glass anyway. Fast forward, and I have attended adult ed classes in those new classrooms with the glass sidelights. I can speak with certainty only for myself, but I think I'm safe in saying that most (if not all) the students in my adult ed classes weren't aware of the sidelights and didn't spend any time looking out through them into the corridor. In other words, they created a security vulnerability while providing no actual, quantifiable benefit. They just satisfied the designer's preconception of what he thought was a great idea. And, unfortunately, the school board was made up of people who weren't really committed to security, they were only committed to saying they were committed to security. None of the members bothered to educate themselves on the topic, they completely delegated it to the architects. In a sane world, one might hope that "But I like it" would not be sufficient reason for building a security vulnerability into a new school wing, but we don't live in a sane world. In the immediate aftermath of sandy Hook, the school board in the town next to mine prodly announced that they were going to upgrade security at their two grammar schools. But (for security reasons, of course) they wouldn't say what the upgrades consisted of. I had known the then-building inspector in that town for many years (he has since retired), so I asked him. The "upgrades" they installed were exactly the same "security" features that had just been installed at Sandy Hook, and which had (obviously) completely failed to provide any security against a lone shooter. This is why a valid security analysis can't be done by a "team" that's made up exclusively of people from one specialty. That just institutionalizes tunnel vision. |
|
April 19, 2019, 01:45 PM | #67 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 8, 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,787
|
Thanks for the clarification. I suspected that security was not part of your formal training. I understand about gaining skills after graduation and licensing - I am a veterinarian and my daughter is a structural engineer. I had a dean in vet school who told us that our diploma was a license to start learning. It's a good attitude to take into life, but as you point out convincingly, not terribly common.
|
April 19, 2019, 03:11 PM | #68 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,717
|
ANOTHER SRO also discharged a gun unintentionally inside of a school. This time in Mesquite, Texas...
https://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local/Me...508765901.html
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011 My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange |
April 19, 2019, 07:00 PM | #69 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 4, 1999
Location: Rebel South USA
Posts: 2,074
|
Quote:
I don't know anything about school shield programs but I have worked on building projects transition teams which were full of LE officials and have been a department liaison on similar projects. Although everyone on the team was part of the LE community in some way, we consulted with people all over the United States, Feds and carefully vetted contractors and specialists. Control was a large concern and there wasn't really a provision to "sign up" to help if you were not already selected as part of the team. A lot of that had to do with control as well as requirement placed on us regarding information. It wasn't tunnel vision at all but we picked the people based on our own standards, they didn't pick us. Just because they do not allow non-LE to be part of the program does not mean they are not consulting closely with or receiving services of specialized individuals. I am sure you are a smart guy and I am sure you can find an avenue to help in some sort of capacity, it just might not be exactly in the way you want. Good luck all the same. I wish more people had a desire get involved in the betterment of school safety.
__________________
Life is a web woven by necessity and chance... Last edited by FireForged; April 19, 2019 at 07:27 PM. |
|
April 19, 2019, 10:56 PM | #70 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,458
|
Quote:
|
|
April 19, 2019, 11:25 PM | #71 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 5, 2010
Location: McMurdo Sound Texas
Posts: 4,322
|
Gee,
I’m betting everyone that is in the 55-75 age range is still traumatized from all the early 1960’s “Duck and Cover” drills we all did in grade school... “You can survive a nuclear blast”, etc, etc monikers. Yea, right. “Someone / some groups” need to deal with the current “threat du jour” and get over it. Every other generation has.
__________________
Cave illos in guns et backhoes |
April 19, 2019, 11:41 PM | #72 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2008
Posts: 2,199
|
TZAX, oddly enough, Duck and Cover has some practical uses. At the distances where one has time to react, flying debris and partial structural collapses are significant concerns, while instant vaporization is less an issue. (There are several websites that can do rough damage/survivability estimates for nuclear detonations. The 100% fatality zone is usually smaller than most people think.)
On topic, one wonders why an SRO would have their firearm unholstered at school...? Training helps, but cannot overcome bad habits or momentary stupidity. |
April 20, 2019, 12:50 AM | #73 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 5, 2010
Location: McMurdo Sound Texas
Posts: 4,322
|
True Ramius,
Later in parts of Texas they became “tornado drills”. But the bottom line is every generation has their PTSD generator: The heartiest adapt, overcome and survive. The snowflakes melt and become drama queens. I love the British moniker “Keep a stiff upper lip “. They earned it.
__________________
Cave illos in guns et backhoes |
April 20, 2019, 01:13 AM | #74 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,717
|
Quote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AEmB1pNQMHg
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011 My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange |
|
April 20, 2019, 06:28 AM | #75 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 12,214
|
Quote:
Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|