|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 16, 2008, 07:42 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 16, 2008
Location: Behind a computer
Posts: 100
|
The Spiller & Burr Revolver
Hi. Newbie here.
I handled a used Spiller & Burr yesterday and liked it better than my Remington. It fit my hand well. Are the Pietta/Traditions S&Bs well made? Is there anything I should know before ordering one from Dixie? Would love to see some pics of S&Bs! Regards, IO |
December 16, 2008, 07:57 PM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: December 8, 2007
Posts: 53
|
Been thinking about 'em also, and have the same questions.
http://www.csarmory.org/spiller/page2.html |
December 16, 2008, 08:12 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 27, 2005
Location: northeast
Posts: 521
|
They're based on the Whitney revolvers. Mine is pretty old. Because they're brass, you should keep the loads fairly low (15 grs of black powder). Great guns.
|
December 16, 2008, 08:26 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,188
|
Dunno bout the Spiller and Burr but Pietta's 60 Colt's and 58 Remingtons are top notch.
|
December 17, 2008, 08:25 AM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Posts: 68
|
The originals have a higher hammer spur and a different grip. There is more room behind the triggerguard on the originals.
Some people say they're loud, for a .36 BP revolver. http://vhs3.vahistorical.org/vhsimag...990.100.13.jpg Last edited by Riot Earp; December 17, 2008 at 08:52 AM. |
December 17, 2008, 09:23 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2005
Posts: 3,733
|
I have an older Italian S&B clone which I got years ago second hand. The nipples are beat to snot and will not take a cap. Anybody know where to get them and what load to use. I have not shot the thing in 15 years.
__________________
"Religions are all alike - founded upon fables and mythologies." Thomas Jefferson "The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason." Benjamin Franklin |
December 17, 2008, 11:06 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 6, 2006
Location: Hernando , Ms.
Posts: 579
|
My Pietta made Spiller & Burr is one of my favorite 36 cal .Revolvers .
|
December 17, 2008, 12:43 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 19, 2008
Location: High & Dry in Missouri Ozarks
Posts: 2,113
|
Quote:
FM
__________________
Fingers (Show Me MO smoke) McGee - AKA Man of Many Colts - Alter ego of Diabolical Ken; SASS Regulator 28564-L-TG; Rangemaster and stage writer extraordinaire; Frontiersman, Pistoleer, NRA Endowment Life, NMLRA, SAF, CCRKBA, STORM 327, SV115; Charter member, Central Ozarks Western Shooters Cynic: A blackguard whose faulty vision see things as they are, not as they should be. Ambrose Bierce |
|
December 18, 2008, 01:57 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 15, 2005
Location: Central Connecticut
Posts: 3,166
|
If I had a gun with a nipple of an unknown size, I would ask this outfit to help me because they're a specialty nipple manufacturer.
1-800-337-1243 http://blomquistpercussionworks.com/products.html |
December 18, 2008, 11:04 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 16, 2008
Location: Behind a computer
Posts: 100
|
Gonna get me one.
|
December 18, 2008, 12:37 PM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: December 8, 2007
Posts: 53
|
I'm going to order a pair. I'll keep the better of the two and send the other back. I might do something different and have Turnbull case harden the loading lever. Will also replace the nipples with Tresos.
|
December 18, 2008, 01:32 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 6, 2006
Location: Hernando , Ms.
Posts: 579
|
Never have had a nipple problem with my Pietta made Spiller ...I use #10 Remington caps ...they fit like a glove ..no problems .
|
December 18, 2008, 07:37 PM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Posts: 68
|
Forgot to mention that the originals also have a smaller, rounder triggerguard.
So, for example, you can tell that pohill's gun is a replica by the large triggerguard, the grip shape/angle, and the low hammer spur. Caveat Emptor: There are fake S&Bs out there. |
December 18, 2008, 07:59 PM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 27, 2005
Location: northeast
Posts: 521
|
Quote:
|
|
December 18, 2008, 08:11 PM | #15 |
Member
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Posts: 68
|
Check out the two links posted above and study the originals very closely, paying particular attention to the triggerguards, hammers, and grips.
People say the best way to tell if a dollar bill is a counterfeit is to study the minutest details of the genuine article. Once you know the genuine front and back, the fake becomes easy to spot. The same goes for guns. I'm 99% certain yours is a replica. |
December 18, 2008, 10:23 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 27, 2005
Location: northeast
Posts: 521
|
I'm more like 80% to 90% sure it's a replica, but...
I showed it to a BP shooter at my club and he handled it, examined it and said it was an original. Several others that have actually seen it and handled it are just not sure, like me. I even bought the book, THE CONFEDERATE BRASS-FRAMED COLT & WHITNEY by William Albaugh, and that added to the confusion due to the list of known serial numbers (mine is #82 which is unaccounted for). The only sure way would be to have the cylinder tested to see if it's made of iron, but I don't want to ruin the cylinder. Hey, anything's possible. |
December 19, 2008, 05:27 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,188
|
The CSA alone tells you it's not the real deal. The hammer, grips and trigger guard as mentioned are all different.
|
December 19, 2008, 06:08 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 27, 2005
Location: northeast
Posts: 521
|
Here's the deal and it's real. I never asked if anyone thought my revolver was original, I just posted a pic of it. Never asked. If anyone thinks they can judge anything about any gun by looking at pics, hey, you must be good, you must be exceptional. Like I said, knowledgeable people have handled it and examined it and they're still not sure.
So, if it floats your boat, call it a replica. |
December 19, 2008, 08:20 AM | #19 |
Member
Join Date: December 8, 2007
Posts: 53
|
Earp, you have an eye for detail. I hadn't noticed those differences until you pointed them out.
|
December 19, 2008, 11:54 AM | #20 |
Member
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Posts: 68
|
For a truly expert opinion on the matter, I suggest that you send these pics to the people at www.damonmills.com, or to another premier antique gun site, and ask them to settle the issue. Then please post their response here on the board. I will be very surprised if they can't make a determination from pics alone.
|
December 19, 2008, 12:41 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 27, 2005
Location: northeast
Posts: 521
|
The keys to this gun being identified are actually the cylinder and the topstrap. The original cylinders were made of iron, and the topstraps were very thin and thus took a beating. Other variations, trigger guard, etc, can be attributed to the manufacturing process and the different lcoations where they were made. Some were stamped Spiller & Burr, some CS, some CSA, some not stamped at all.
So, what if this cylinder is made of iron? Does that mean it's an original? Maybe, maybe not. But the topstrap is in great shape, it's not weak, or thin, so to me that is the key. Is it a fake or a defarbed repro? I haven't seen too many, or any, fake Spiller & Burrs, but a few defarbed ones. Fake would imply a conscious effort to deceive on the part of the seller/owner. Do I think it's an original? Like I said, I'm 80% to 90% sure it's not. Someday I might have an "expert" look at it, if I could determine what qualifies someone as an expert in regards to such an obscure revolver (unlike a Colt expert), but until then, it's not really an issue with me. But it is interesting. Check out this gun - is it an original Whitney or a Palmetto repro? |
December 19, 2008, 01:34 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 2, 2007
Location: Northern Orygun
Posts: 4,923
|
Modern replicas of the Spiller and Burr have steel cylinders, that's the easiest way to tell that I know of. Some, not all of the originals had C.S. stamped on the. None had CSA that I am aware of.
This is a modern manufacter, maker unknown. It appears to be defarbed. This one is original |
December 19, 2008, 03:02 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 21, 2008
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 1,393
|
Did anybody think about measuring the rate of twist in the barrels and compare?
|
December 19, 2008, 07:25 PM | #24 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,188
|
Quote:
|
|
December 19, 2008, 08:29 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 27, 2005
Location: northeast
Posts: 521
|
Correct. But the store that sold it to me said it was a pre-Italian Whitney repro. They should have known better. Oh well, my gain.
|
|
|