The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > The Smithy

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old March 4, 2019, 07:28 PM   #1
308Loader
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 24, 2014
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 639
AR 15 upper receiver

looking for a inexpensive yet functional upper receiver for a 300 bo build. I found a blem from gorilla machining that looks promising. any one have any experience with this company? any other suggestions on where to look?

this is a spare parts build. I picked up a barrel from a friend at a ok price, would like to assemble a separate upper for the 300BO for ease of change out. have 2 lower's I can snap it into.
__________________
Just a dude with stuff.
308Loader is offline  
Old March 5, 2019, 08:01 AM   #2
Mobuck
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
"any other suggestions on where to look?"

just google "AR 15 upper receiver--11 suggestions on the first page and all decent places to order from
Mobuck is offline  
Old March 5, 2019, 08:43 AM   #3
zukiphile
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 13, 2005
Posts: 4,451
Does a "blemished" upper have the correct dimensions? It may be that you can't tell until you order it. That same supplier has regular uppers for $13 more. For $40 you could likely find an unblemished upper for $40-ish.
zukiphile is offline  
Old March 5, 2019, 10:37 AM   #4
308Loader
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 24, 2014
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 639
yes, of course I googled it. that's what brought me to the gorilla company. just never herd of them. midway, cheeper than dirt,... all have one for 15-20 bucks more, just looking to save $ on this one.
__________________
Just a dude with stuff.
308Loader is offline  
Old March 5, 2019, 11:24 AM   #5
FrankenMauser
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
Each company is going to have to be taken on its own, but...

Typically, "blemished" receivers have problems that are only cosmetic. I.e.: Bad anodizing, chunks in the anodizing, blotchy anodizing, flawed engraving, T-marks with no (or unwanted) white fill, etc...
(I've seen all of the above, and more.)

I haven't had a problem with any of my 'blem' receivers (upper and lower). But they were also all from otherwise reputable companies that specifically state that the blems are dimensionally within spec and only cosmetically flawed.

Two examples:
I have a PSA 'blem' upper that has white T-marks, but no fill in the PSA logo -- opposite of what that batch was supposed to get. Thusly, they sold the whole lot as blems.
I have an Aero Precision upper that has small ding/divot in the side, with a shiny spot in the anodizing. It looks like it was dropped on something, or a tool was dropped on the upper. It's purely cosmetic, and there are no other issues; but I got it for less than half price. ("Super blem blowout sale", and it was a special item listed by itself.)


I've heard of Gorilla Machining, but have never done business with them.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe.
FrankenMauser is offline  
Old March 5, 2019, 02:00 PM   #6
zukiphile
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 13, 2005
Posts: 4,451
Quote:
Two examples:
I have a PSA 'blem' upper that has white T-marks, but no fill in the PSA logo -- opposite of what that batch was supposed to get. Thusly, they sold the whole lot as blems.
I posed the question because I bought a PSA blem lower that was supposed to have a cosmetic blemish. I couldn't find any cosmetic blemish, but the fit to any upper was pretty sloppy. I suspected a dimensional problem that left it usable but less desirable.

On the other hand, I ordered an entire blemished upper from PSA. They disclosed the rub mark on the barrel under the handguards; it was a great upper.
zukiphile is offline  
Old March 5, 2019, 06:11 PM   #7
308Loader
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 24, 2014
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 639
Company states "Our blemished products are fully functional, they just didn't meet our high standards. They are a great product at a discounted price for someone who doesn't mind a slight imperfection."

But their is this "We do not accept returns on blemished products."

From the photo on the page I see a small section on the right hand side rear that looks to be cut out or cut into after the finish was applied. could just be the pic.

Seems no one here has done business with these folks. For $29 thinking about giving it a go. Ill give it another day or so to see if any one has input on this company. If I pull the trigger on this product (pun intended) Ill let you all know what I find. If anyone has a functional upper (stripped or complete) they want to get rid of in this price range pm me, we might be able to work something out.

as always thanks for the input.
__________________
Just a dude with stuff.
308Loader is offline  
Old March 6, 2019, 07:41 AM   #8
Mobuck
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
Cosmetic blems may be only a tiny variance in the final finish. I doubt any conscientious seller would let an out of spec part out their door intentionally.
A couple months back I ordered some stripped uppers from Radical Arms. When they showed up, the pin hole for the dust cover retainer pin was mis-aligned. I offered to keep both buggered uppers at a discount but the seller wanted them back--no messed up parts left with a customer. There wasn't anything functionally wrong as long as the user didn't need the dust cover.
Mobuck is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.06695 seconds with 8 queries