The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > General Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old January 1, 2021, 08:03 AM   #1
polska
Member
 
Join Date: February 3, 2010
Posts: 55
Lexington and Concord

I don't know why everyone keeps saying the British were coming to take our firearms because they were not. They were coming to take ball and powder. Interesting, sound familiar? Those who don't study history are doomed to repeat it.
polska is offline  
Old January 1, 2021, 09:08 AM   #2
mehavey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 17, 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,896
Yup... make ammunition unobtanium... and who needs guns control?
mehavey is offline  
Old January 1, 2021, 09:09 AM   #3
mikejonestkd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 3, 2006
Location: Brockport, NY
Posts: 3,717
A nice short summary of the event
https://www.battlefields.org/learn/r...on-and-concord
__________________
You are the bows from which your children as living arrows are sent forth.
mikejonestkd is offline  
Old January 1, 2021, 10:32 AM   #4
mehavey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 17, 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,896
Am I reading the usual description wrong?
>
> "The Massachusetts militias had indeed been gathering
> a stock of weapons, powder, and supplies at Concord"
>
https://www.revolutionary-war.net/th...le-of-concord/
mehavey is offline  
Old January 1, 2021, 11:14 AM   #5
Don P
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 17, 2005
Location: Swamp dweller
Posts: 6,187
Quote:
I don't know why everyone keeps saying the British were coming to take our firearms because they were not. They were coming to take ball and powder. Interesting, sound familiar? Those who don't study history are doomed to repeat it
Why did they bury firearms then?

From the above posts link
Quote:
The British Gather Munitions in Concord
They came first to Colonel James foorett’s home, assuming that there was ammunition to be found in the home of the leader of the American militia. What they did not know was that Colonel foorett’s sons had previously plowed crops and buried the weapons there.
__________________
NRA Life Member, NRA Chief Range Safety Officer, NRA Certified Pistol Instructor,, USPSA & Steel Challange NROI Range Officer,
ICORE Range Officer,
,MAG 40 Graduate
As you are, I once was, As I am, You will be.
Don P is offline  
Old January 1, 2021, 02:29 PM   #6
dontcatchmany
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 19, 2010
Posts: 460
It ain't (Southern expression to show emphasis) what they are going to do, it is what we are going to do.

Seems as though the British did not get the ball and powder.

We just need to get some balls and keep Lady Liberty happy!
dontcatchmany is offline  
Old January 1, 2021, 05:15 PM   #7
Kevin Rohrer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 19, 2010
Location: Medina, Ohio
Posts: 1,049
Umm, the British Regulars were also looking for cannons the British Colonials had in their possession.
__________________
Member: Orange Gunsite Family, NRA--Life, ARTCA, and American Legion.

Caveat Emptor: Cavery Grips/AmericanGripz/Prestige Grips/Stealth Grips from Clayton, NC. He is a scammer
Kevin Rohrer is offline  
Old January 1, 2021, 07:41 PM   #8
Shadow9mm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 21, 2012
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 3,976
actually, they did not say the british were coming, as they were British. They said the red coats are coming. Modern day it would be similar to, the militay is coming.

I also understood it to be a cache of powder, bullets, and cannons.
__________________
I don't believe in "range fodder" that is why I reload.
Shadow9mm is offline  
Old January 1, 2021, 08:14 PM   #9
2damnold4this
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 12, 2009
Location: Athens, Georgia
Posts: 2,526
Quote:
Seems as though the British did not get the ball and powder.
They did get some of the ball but not the way they wanted.
2damnold4this is offline  
Old January 1, 2021, 08:53 PM   #10
dontcatchmany
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 19, 2010
Posts: 460
2damnold4this

I stand correted....lol! Proudly!
dontcatchmany is offline  
Old January 1, 2021, 09:10 PM   #11
SIGSHR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 13, 2005
Posts: 4,700
The one account I read, said Paul Revere banged on the door of one acquaintance-at about 0100-when the man angrily demanded to why Revere was creating such a disturbance he said:
"You'll have your disturbance soon enough ! The Regulars are out !"
SIGSHR is offline  
Old January 1, 2021, 10:15 PM   #12
TXAZ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 5, 2010
Location: McMurdo Sound Texas
Posts: 4,322
If the colonials only had a dozen Accuracy International AICS bolts in .338 LM and a few thousand rounds each
It would have been interesting to see a rank and file infantry deal with leadership out of the picture....
__________________

Cave illos in guns et backhoes
TXAZ is offline  
Old January 1, 2021, 10:30 PM   #13
mehavey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 17, 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,896
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Guns_of_the_South
mehavey is offline  
Old January 1, 2021, 10:38 PM   #14
roscoe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 16, 2002
Location: AZ
Posts: 575
Lord.

What if Spartacus had a Piper Cub?


Last edited by roscoe; January 1, 2021 at 10:48 PM.
roscoe is offline  
Old January 2, 2021, 02:50 AM   #15
rickyrick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2010
Posts: 8,238
I just watched a documentary on this.

“The British are coming” is not a phrase that would have been used during that time, because they were all British then.

Most likely it was something like “the Regulars are coming”.
rickyrick is offline  
Old January 2, 2021, 10:22 AM   #16
4V50 Gary
Staff
 
Join Date: November 2, 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 21,841
Quote:
They did get some of the ball but not the way they wanted.
Worth repeating.
__________________
Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt. Molon Labe!
4V50 Gary is offline  
Old January 2, 2021, 02:36 PM   #17
reteach
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 31, 2016
Location: Texas
Posts: 379
Quote:
It would have been interesting to see a rank and file infantry deal with leadership out of the picture....
Many of the American militia were veterans of the French and Indian War. Some of them saw first hand the results in events like the Battle of the Monongahela, aka Braddock's Defeat, where the French and their Indian allies targeted British officers. The British casualties amounted to about 65% of their force, and many of those appear to be the result of the rank and file not having officers to organize and control them.

On the road back to Boston, after the fights at Lexington and Concord, the Americans fought from cover and targeted British officers, causing a lot of confusion among the British. The highest American casualties came at the end of the day when British reinforcements came out from Boston with artillery. The cannon caught Americans clumped together at long range.

The Americans did the same thing at the follow-up Battle of Bunker Hill (which took place on Breed's Hill). They targeted British officers. The British thought this was not at all sporting. The reason the Americans lost that fight was they couldn't move gunpowder up to their fortified position fast enough. They had to retreat, but the casualties were very lopsided, with the British having 55% to the Americans' 32%. Nathanael Greene said "I'd like to sell them another hill at the same price."
reteach is offline  
Old January 2, 2021, 03:06 PM   #18
mehavey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 17, 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,896
The casualty count was the highest suffered by the British in any single encounter during the entire war.
General Clinton, echoing Pyrrhus* of Epirus, remarked in his diary that

"A few more such victories would have shortly put an end to British dominion in America"



*
Ne ego si iterum eodem modo vicero, sine ullo milite Epirum revertar.
mehavey is offline  
Old January 4, 2021, 04:34 AM   #19
shurshot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 25, 2006
Posts: 1,819
"I don't know why everyone keeps saying the British were coming to take our firearms because they were not. They were coming to take ball and powder. Interesting, sound familiar? Those who don't study history are doomed to repeat it."(OP)

In the mid 80's, visiting family in Downeast Maine, my uncle showed me one MINT revolutionary war era flintlock rifle that he had. Several had been located beneath the floorboards of the town hall, hidden from the British back in the day. Flash forward to modern day; during reconstruction, the rifles were located, each of the Town selectman kept one, hence my Uncle getting his. It shined as it had been packed in some kind of grease, looked brand new. Powder and ball were located as well.
I'm pretty sure the rifles were hidden for a good reason... fear of confiscation. Don't believe everything you read.
shurshot is offline  
Old January 4, 2021, 08:31 AM   #20
Kevin Rohrer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 19, 2010
Location: Medina, Ohio
Posts: 1,049
Quote:
Most likely it was something like “the Regulars are coming”.
^^This^^

is correct.
__________________
Member: Orange Gunsite Family, NRA--Life, ARTCA, and American Legion.

Caveat Emptor: Cavery Grips/AmericanGripz/Prestige Grips/Stealth Grips from Clayton, NC. He is a scammer
Kevin Rohrer is offline  
Old January 4, 2021, 09:39 AM   #21
buck460XVR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 28, 2006
Posts: 4,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by polska View Post
I don't know why everyone keeps saying the British were coming to take our firearms because they were not. They were coming to take ball and powder. Interesting, sound familiar? Those who don't study history are doomed to repeat it.
....is this some form of reference to a tin foil hat conspiracy, explaining the lack of availability of ammo and reloading components right now?
buck460XVR is offline  
Old January 4, 2021, 07:23 PM   #22
Howland
Member
 
Join Date: March 10, 2018
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin Rohrer View Post
Umm, the British Regulars were also looking for cannons the British Colonials had in their possession.
Correct! The primary objective of the mission was to seize the cannons and cannonballs. The powder and shot were secondary objectives. The militia had cannons. Artillery. Equal in quantity and quality to that of the British Army. And they considered it their right. The purpose was not for deer or duck hunting. The purpose was to provide a counterbalance to any standing army which would be anyone paid to carry a government gun.

I helped someone study for their citizenship naturalization test. The test asked, "What issue sparked the Revolutionary War?" The answer they were looking for was Taxes. Wrong. It was a gun confiscation raid. The test also asked, "What type of government did the Constitution establish?" They were counting Democracy as the correct answer. I don't think Republic was even one of the choices.
Howland is offline  
Old January 4, 2021, 11:36 PM   #23
44 AMP
Staff
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,846
Do remember the times. There were "standing armies" in North America, Some 20 years before the Revolution the citizen's militia fought a war serving with British regulars against the French and their Indian allies.

The British army was in North America. The French Army was in North America, there were some Spanish troops in Florida, and there were also hostile and aggressive native peoples all of which could be a threat to the colonial citizens.

The various militias had cannon (as they could afford them) because there was a NEED for them. A real need, not just an imagined one.

as to this,
Quote:
"What issue sparked the Revolutionary War?" The answer they were looking for was Taxes. Wrong.
I believe the issue was taxes. Unfair taxes and other requirements all without colonial representation of any kind when the laws were passed in Parliment.

The incident that set things off was the gun confiscation raid.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
44 AMP is online now  
Old January 5, 2021, 08:57 AM   #24
buck460XVR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 28, 2006
Posts: 4,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howland View Post

The test asked, "What issue sparked the Revolutionary War?" The answer they were looking for was Taxes. Wrong.
In Grade school, the phrase beat into out head about the Revolutionary war was " No taxation without representation".
buck460XVR is offline  
Old January 5, 2021, 09:57 AM   #25
mehavey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 17, 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,896
Taxes to pay for the French & Indians War, and to pay for troops thereafter to protect the frontier.
Taxes which the mercantile colonies (the Yankees) found to be an impediment
Taxes which lead to the Boston Tea Party
The Tea Party which led to the `74 Intolerable Acts (including taking away Mass self Gov't and closing Boston Harbor)
The Intolerable Acts which led to the 1st Continental Congress (`74)

From that point it spiralled.

So yes... it was Taxes which sparked the Revolution
mehavey is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.11908 seconds with 8 queries