|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 6, 2019, 12:42 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 14, 2000
Location: Colorado
Posts: 204
|
Cast bullets labeled .358" 180gr. But weigh 170
Uncovered a stash of ABC cast bullets from years ago. They are labeled .358" 180gr. TC but weigh 170. gr. Would a high alloy mix account for 10 gr. of weight? Do I load for 180gr. or 170gr.? Planning on using 13 gr. of 2400. Sound right?
Thanks in advance, dgang
__________________
I shoot, therefore I am. |
October 6, 2019, 01:04 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 19, 2005
Location: Tx Panhandle Territory
Posts: 4,159
|
It's probably doubtful that such a mistake would occur, but I kind of wonder of the original weigher weighed his with a gas check on it?
Sorry, but I don't know about your recipe- my wonderments got stuck on wondering how much a gas check might weigh.
__________________
Rednecks... Keeping the woods critter-free since March 2, 1836. (TX Independence Day) I suspect a thing or two... because I've seen a thing or two. |
October 6, 2019, 01:13 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 14, 2000
Location: Colorado
Posts: 204
|
The heel of the bullet does not allow for a gas check. Just wondering if an alloy would reduce the weight that much
__________________
I shoot, therefore I am. |
October 6, 2019, 01:40 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 14, 2000
Location: Colorado
Posts: 204
|
Hey 10-06
Agree with you on the use of the word "clip". John Browning referred to the "loading device" on the Model 1911 .45 as a "clip". If it was good enough for Browning it is good enough for me.
__________________
I shoot, therefore I am. |
October 6, 2019, 02:35 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 13, 2006
Posts: 8,286
|
Sometimes questions can be answered by plugging them into a little math.
Divide 170 into 180 or 180 into 170 and you will reveal that the weight discrepancy is about 5 1/2 %. A typical bullet alloy for handgun bullets might be 20 to 1 lead to tin,or roughly 5% Tin. So,if the tin were absolutely weightless,which it is not,the 5% tin would not cause a 5 1/2 % weight shortage. I suspect error in calculating the initial volume of the mold...such as not allowing for the shrinkage,or the lube grooves,etc at the drawing board. It also might not hurt to verify your scale with either test weights,(best) or samples of quality jacketed bullets. Of course,test weights are best,but not always available. Generally bullets from Sierra or Nosler or Hornady or Speer,etc,will be very close to advertised weight. Close enough to confirm the scale is pretty good or grossly off. I don't mean 1/10th grain accurate,or even 1 grain accurate,but they will suggest whether a 10 grain discrepancy is the scale or the bullet. Last edited by HiBC; October 6, 2019 at 02:47 PM. |
October 6, 2019, 04:39 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2017
Posts: 1,868
|
Melt them down and recast yourself. Problem goes away!
|
October 6, 2019, 06:30 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2014
Posts: 1,965
|
To answer the OP's question: yes, alloy affects weight.
None of my cast bullets weight what the mold says they will. Usually a mold is based on wheel weight alloy or Lyman #2 alloy. It should be indicated with the mold. Usually, when a bullet weighs less than the mold design, it is due to someone attempting to make one of those stupid hard cast bullets. Always base your load data on the actual weight of the bullet, not what it is supposed to weigh. That is only common sense. I you do "melt them down and re-cast them" the problem does not go away. They are still going to cast lighter unless you add some lead to the alloy. |
October 6, 2019, 06:33 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 28, 1999
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,802
|
I believe I answered this question on another forum but I'll do it here as well.
Bullet weight cam be noticeably different depending on the alloy used. I have an RCBS mold for the 250 gr. .375 caliber bullet (#37-250-FN) that casts out at 270 gr. in my alloy. IIRC, RCBS uses linotype metal for determining bullet weight for their molds. Lyman used they #2 metal which probably would be heavier than if linotype were used. My alloy is basically wheel weights with linotype, lead free solder and magnum bird shot added and probably would run somewhere between Lyman's #2 and straight wheel weights. Maybe the OP should try scratching one of the bullets with a fingernail. If it's a bit difficult to scratch my guess would be it's most likely linotype. I have a few Lyman #358477 bullets that someone cast out of babbit metal. According to Lyman that bullet should weigh about 150 gr. I know it's close to that with linotype but these very hard babbit metal bullets run right at 141 gr., all because of the high tin content in that particular babbit alloy. did add just a bit more to this answer from the one on another site. Hope it clears up the OP's question. Paul B.
__________________
COMPROMISE IS NOT AN OPTION! |
October 6, 2019, 08:08 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 14, 2000
Location: Colorado
Posts: 204
|
Thanks for the input
I did do a crude hardness test, nail punch and 8oz. hammer from 6", with a known hard cast bullet ( Laser Cast, about 15 bhn according to the new owner Frank) and they appear to be about the same. NBC bullets (sorry not ABC) use to brag about their hardness. I agree, even with a large amount of alloy it would not account for the difference in weight. I will load accordingly. Thanks again.
__________________
I shoot, therefore I am. |
October 7, 2019, 09:19 AM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
|
Quote:
That's why "clip guide (slot)" is the name of the rifle receiver bridge cutout a clip fits in to align the cartridges to charge the magazine. M14 rifles and bolt action NRA match rifles have one to help charge their magazines. From SAAMI's glossary: CARTRIDGE CLIP A separate cartridge container to hold cartridges or shells in proper sequence for feeding into a specific firearm. It is a magazine charger, and unlike a magazine does not contain a feeding spring. Sometimes improperly called a Magazine. Last edited by Bart B.; October 7, 2019 at 12:13 PM. |
|
October 7, 2019, 09:28 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,541
|
I have not heard anybody improperly call a clip a magazine.
Of course calling a magazine a clip is a common error that arouses the ire of the internet experts who think the "bore" of their rifle is .308". |
October 7, 2019, 01:03 PM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 14, 2000
Location: Colorado
Posts: 204
|
Quote:
__________________
I shoot, therefore I am. |
|
October 7, 2019, 01:10 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
|
|
October 7, 2019, 01:34 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 22, 2015
Location: new england
Posts: 1,159
|
I am going to go clip my nails while I read a magazine.
|
October 7, 2019, 02:21 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2012
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Posts: 1,752
|
The cast bullets hardly ever weigh what is listed on the mould casting them...
My answer is...Don't weigh them and use data listed for the weight on the box. But this is with home cast bullets. Store bought cast bullets , 10 grains off is a bit much . Some where along the highway a mistake was made by packaging or labeling or casting . Weigh them and load as 170 grain . If data is hard to come by ...using data for 180 grain bullet will be safe . Gary |
October 7, 2019, 06:51 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 15, 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,566
|
Just a note here. I have a 170 gr Lyman mold, with straight linotype it weighs 163 gr. The alloy makes quite a difference in the actual weight of the bullet.
Cast bullets I buy are all close to advertised weight. Never found any 10 or even 3 gr. off. |
October 8, 2019, 10:33 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 19, 2012
Posts: 297
|
If bullets mike the proper diameter, I'd just load and shoot using 180 grain data. hdbiker
|
October 8, 2019, 12:42 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 10, 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 7,014
|
Per above. Mike em. That tells you a lot.
Used to be a punch tool to give you an idea (not perfect) for hardness and maybe not a bad idea to have one if they still exist if you are going to work with cast. And from memory, I read accounts of the variations in cast so it does not sound like they are wacko off, though 10 grains would seem to be abut the max (for 180 gr weight) .
__________________
Science and Facts are True whether you believe it or not |
|
|