So how about NJ next?

Willie Sutton · March 8, 2012, 10:28 PM

Maryland outcome is great news. How about a parallel effort in NJ where the laws are "may issue", but are really "never issue" based on the law calling for the issuance of a permit only to those showing a need that benefits the public, not the individual. Seems time to challenge this and end rationing of rights in yet another place.

Gents?

Willie

Al Norris · March 8, 2012, 11:02 PM

You haven't been following the 2A cases thread, have you!

34. Piszczatoski v. Maenz (was Muller): Filed on 11-22-2010, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. David D. Jensen and Robert P. Firriolo attorneys for the plaintiffs. This is another SAF civil rights suit that seeks to divest State authorities, in a facial challenge, of their uncontrolled discretion to deny permits to carry and in the case of Superior Court Judges, uncontrolled discretion to limit or restrict licenses.

This case is now in the 3rd Circuit. See this thread for details: http://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=434336

March 8, 2012, 10:28 PM	#1
Willie Sutton Junior member Join Date: January 26, 2012 Posts: 1,066	So how about NJ next? Maryland outcome is great news. How about a parallel effort in NJ where the laws are "may issue", but are really "never issue" based on the law calling for the issuance of a permit only to those showing a need that benefits the public, not the individual. Seems time to challenge this and end rationing of rights in yet another place. Gents? Willie

March 8, 2012, 11:02 PM	#2
Al Norris Moderator Emeritus Join Date: June 29, 2000 Location: Rupert, Idaho Posts: 9,660	You haven't been following the 2A cases thread, have you! 34. Piszczatoski v. Maenz (was Muller): Filed on 11-22-2010, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. David D. Jensen and Robert P. Firriolo attorneys for the plaintiffs. This is another SAF civil rights suit that seeks to divest State authorities, in a facial challenge, of their uncontrolled discretion to deny permits to carry and in the case of Superior Court Judges, uncontrolled discretion to limit or restrict licenses. This case is now in the 3rd Circuit. See this thread for details: http://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=434336