The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The North Corral > Black Powder and Cowboy Action Shooting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old February 4, 2021, 06:00 AM   #1
9245
Member
 
Join Date: January 30, 2021
Posts: 21
35 grains of triple 7?

I know normally triple seven loads are supposed to be reduced because of pressure, but also that it gives a velocity bonus.

I have also heard that the cylinders in the Italian reproduction revolvers are actually very tough.

So could a reproduction cap and ball revolver tolerate a non reduced triple seven load? Specifically a Pietta (or Army San Marco, I now have both) 1858 Remington with about 35 grains?

It would be cool to break 1,000 feet per second in one of these but only if it can be done safely.

I have another reason to ask too, even the black powder stuff has become scarce, I could find no real fffg, and the only substitutes I could find were Pyrodex and Triple 7, and most of that was in pellet form, though I did find some actual powder also. I went with the Pyrodex because I knew the load data did not have to be modified, but it makes me wonder, if all I can find is Triple 7, could I get away with using the same load data without modifying it?
9245 is offline  
Old February 4, 2021, 07:44 AM   #2
Schlitz 45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 14, 2018
Location: Colorado
Posts: 383
I don’t believe it’s possible to overload a black powder revolver using the proper powder or substitutes like 777 or Pyrodex. Just a bigger flame of powder chasing the bullet out of the barrel.
Schlitz 45 is offline  
Old February 4, 2021, 11:08 AM   #3
Aguila Blanca
Staff
 
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,433
I wouldn't try to exceed 1,000 fps with a black powder revolver, even a modern one.

https://www.muzzle-loaders.com/artic...-powder-loads/

22 to 28 grains.
__________________
NRA Life Member / Certified Instructor
NRA Chief RSO / CMP RSO
1911 Certified Armorer
Jeepaholic
Aguila Blanca is offline  
Old February 4, 2021, 04:20 PM   #4
9245
Member
 
Join Date: January 30, 2021
Posts: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aguila Blanca View Post
I wouldn't try to exceed 1,000 fps with a black powder revolver, even a modern one.

https://www.muzzle-loaders.com/artic...-powder-loads/

22 to 28 grains.
That link does not give load data for .44 caliber.

Also, I believe the historical loads were between about 25 and 35 grains depending on cartridge maker, Colt cartridges being on the low end. I know some people have claimed to have gotten as much as 40 grains to load, albeit with a highly compressed load.
9245 is offline  
Old February 4, 2021, 04:44 PM   #5
Hawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,177
T7 is 15% hotter than bp so if you want a bp equivalent load you need to reduce it by 15%. If you want to load it full up in a steel frame it's not going to hurt anything.
Hawg is offline  
Old February 4, 2021, 07:47 PM   #6
Aguila Blanca
Staff
 
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,433
Quote:
Originally Posted by 9245
That link does not give load data for .44 caliber.
Of course it does. A .44 Remington takes a .454" ball. I know this -- I have two of them. Just look down the list -- ".44 Revolver"

In the normal load table, for .44 Revolver it calls for 22 to 28 grains of FFFG. Below that, in the "Maximum" tables, it says the maximum with black powder (the real stuff) is 35 grains. For Pyrodex the maximum is 28 grains. I have never used either Pyrodex or Triple-7 but my understanding is that Triple-7 is more like Pyrodex than black powder.
__________________
NRA Life Member / Certified Instructor
NRA Chief RSO / CMP RSO
1911 Certified Armorer
Jeepaholic
Aguila Blanca is offline  
Old February 4, 2021, 09:05 PM   #7
9245
Member
 
Join Date: January 30, 2021
Posts: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aguila Blanca View Post
Of course it does. A .44 Remington takes a .454" ball. I know this -- I have two of them. Just look down the list -- ".44 Revolver"

In the normal load table, for .44 Revolver it calls for 22 to 28 grains of FFFG. Below that, in the "Maximum" tables, it says the maximum with black powder (the real stuff) is 35 grains. For Pyrodex the maximum is 28 grains. I have never used either Pyrodex or Triple-7 but my understanding is that Triple-7 is more like Pyrodex than black powder.
Black Powder is measured volumetrically, Pyrodex has less weight than Black Powder but the same volume, it is not necessary to reduce the load as long as you are using Black Powder measures and not a scale, the pressures are near identical, though Pyrodex gives a better velocity, though not by much.

Tripple 7 as you pointed out is extra pressure, hence reducing the loads, my question was can a non reduced load still be used safely in a modern reproduction given the higher quality steel?
9245 is offline  
Old February 4, 2021, 10:02 PM   #8
Hawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,177
Quote:
Originally Posted by 9245 View Post
my question was can a non reduced load still be used safely in a modern reproduction given the higher quality steel?
I answered that already but yes you can safely load it up to the gills and safely shoot it.
Hawg is offline  
Old February 4, 2021, 10:30 PM   #9
Hellgate
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 18, 2010
Location: Orygun
Posts: 868
bThe only area of caution I would cite is stuffing a full chamber on a Walker. I heard several years ago from a reliable source (since forgotten) of an incident where the barrel assembly of a Colt Walker was sent down range from a load of T7 3F. The owner of the gun was going to try to come up with a salvage operation on his gun to create a weird type of pepperbox revolver from what was left of his gun. The gun came apart at the wedge cutout on the cylinder pin.
__________________
With over 15 perCUSSIN' revolvers, I've been called the Imelda Marcos of cap & ball.
SASS#3302 (Life), SASS Regulator, NRA (Life), Dirty Gamey Bastards #129
Wolverton Mtn. Peacekeepers (WA), former Orygun Cowboy (Ranger, Posse from Hell)
Hellgate is offline  
Old February 5, 2021, 12:33 AM   #10
Aguila Blanca
Staff
 
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,433
Quote:
Originally Posted by 9245
Black Powder is measured volumetrically, Pyrodex has less weight than Black Powder but the same volume, it is not necessary to reduce the load as long as you are using Black Powder measures and not a scale, the pressures are near identical, though Pyrodex gives a better velocity, though not by much.
Black powder is measured volumetrically as an approximation to obtain the weight specified. I didn't come up with the powder charges in grains and grams (both weights, not volumes), the source of that article did. The old-time, black powder cartridge designations were a combination of (nominal) caliber and powder charge -- in weight by grains -- such as .32-20, .44-40, .45-70, etc.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 9245
Tripple 7 as you pointed out is extra pressure, hence reducing the loads, my question was can a non reduced load still be used safely in a modern reproduction given the higher quality steel?
And the chart (which appears to have come from Pietta, the manufacturer you asked about) says no. It says the maximum charge with real FFFG black powder is 35 grains, but the maximum with Pyrodex is 28 grains. If Triple-7 is similar in energy density to Pyrodex, then the same 28 grains would apply. If Triple-7 is 15% more energetic than black powder, as someone posted above, then 35 grains minus 15% is 29.75 grains. That's not a lot more than 28.

It's your gun. How far you wish to push the envelope is your prerogative.
__________________
NRA Life Member / Certified Instructor
NRA Chief RSO / CMP RSO
1911 Certified Armorer
Jeepaholic
Aguila Blanca is offline  
Old February 5, 2021, 02:13 AM   #11
9245
Member
 
Join Date: January 30, 2021
Posts: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aguila Blanca View Post
Black powder is measured volumetrically as an approximation to obtain the weight specified. I didn't come up with the powder charges in grains and grams (both weights, not volumes), the source of that article did. The old-time, black powder cartridge designations were a combination of (nominal) caliber and powder charge -- in weight by grains -- such as .32-20, .44-40, .45-70, etc.


And the chart (which appears to have come from Pietta, the manufacturer you asked about) says no. It says the maximum charge with real FFFG black powder is 35 grains, but the maximum with Pyrodex is 28 grains. If Triple-7 is similar in energy density to Pyrodex, then the same 28 grains would apply. If Triple-7 is 15% more energetic than black powder, as someone posted above, then 35 grains minus 15% is 29.75 grains. That's not a lot more than 28.

It's your gun. How far you wish to push the envelope is your prerogative.
You missed what I was saying, 35 grains of Black Powder is volumetrically the same as 28 grains of Pyrodex, therefore if you measure for 35 grains of Black Powder the measure will get 28 grains of Pyrodex. The data is only relevant if you are measuring by weight, not volume, if you are measuring by volume 35 grains of Black Powder and 28 grains of Pyrodex are the same, you don’t have to complicate it, you just measure the Pyrodex the same as you would black powder, by volume, not weight.

If you insist on weighing everything then yes, Pyrodex will be 38 grains, but it will still use the same volume as 35 grains of Black Powder would.

Last edited by 9245; February 5, 2021 at 06:06 AM.
9245 is offline  
Old February 5, 2021, 05:39 AM   #12
Hawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,177
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hellgate View Post
bThe only area of caution I would cite is stuffing a full chamber on a Walker. I heard several years ago from a reliable source (since forgotten) of an incident where the barrel assembly of a Colt Walker was sent down range from a load of T7 3F. The owner of the gun was going to try to come up with a salvage operation on his gun to create a weird type of pepperbox revolver from what was left of his gun. The gun came apart at the wedge cutout on the cylinder pin.
I find it hard to believe a load of T7 would do that to a Walker. A Walker will hold 60 grains of powder. A full load of T7 is only 69 grains equivalent.
Hawg is offline  
Old February 5, 2021, 12:39 PM   #13
Aguila Blanca
Staff
 
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,433
Quote:
Originally Posted by 9245
You missed what I was saying, 35 grains of Black Powder is volumetrically the same as 28 grains of Pyrodex, therefore if you measure for 35 grains of Black Powder the measure will get 28 grains of Pyrodex. The data is only relevant if you are measuring by weight, not volume, if you are measuring by volume 35 grains of Black Powder and 28 grains of Pyrodex are the same, you don’t have to complicate it, you just measure the Pyrodex the same as you would black powder, by volume, not weight.
Looking again at that chart I gave you the link to, it does say "Suggested Grains (by Volume)" -- which would never have occurred to me, since both grains and grams are units of weight, not volume.

That said, the chart entries for .44 Revolver show maximum loads of 35 grains of FFFG black powder, but only 28 grains of Pyrodex. So you are saying those are volumetrically equal. I've never used Pyrodex, so I can't comment. You have Pyrodex, so does 28 grains of Pyrodex get you to your 1,000 fps?

As for Triple-7, how does that compare to FFFG and Pyrodex in terms of volumetric energy efficiency?
__________________
NRA Life Member / Certified Instructor
NRA Chief RSO / CMP RSO
1911 Certified Armorer
Jeepaholic
Aguila Blanca is offline  
Old February 5, 2021, 01:55 PM   #14
Hawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,177
Pyrodex is a volume to volume sub for bp. It's about the same as Swiss energy wise. It is a lot more compressible than bp is so you can pack more into a chamber than you can real black. I don't know about T7 other than the 15% thing as I've never used it.
Hawg is offline  
Old February 6, 2021, 02:08 AM   #15
9245
Member
 
Join Date: January 30, 2021
Posts: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aguila Blanca View Post
Looking again at that chart I gave you the link to, it does say "Suggested Grains (by Volume)" -- which would never have occurred to me, since both grains and grams are units of weight, not volume.

That said, the chart entries for .44 Revolver show maximum loads of 35 grains of FFFG black powder, but only 28 grains of Pyrodex. So you are saying those are volumetrically equal. I've never used Pyrodex, so I can't comment. You have Pyrodex, so does 28 grains of Pyrodex get you to your 1,000 fps?

As for Triple-7, how does that compare to FFFG and Pyrodex in terms of volumetric energy efficiency?
Correct, if you used the same 35 grain (volumetric) measure for black powder with Pyrodex you would find that you had 28 grains of Pyrodex in the same volume as 35 grains of Black Powder.

As for Triple 7, it is NOT a one to one substitute for Black Powder, unlike Pyrodex, the same 35 grain volumetric measure for Black Powder, but using Triple 7, would be the equivalent to about 40.25 grains of Black Powder.
9245 is offline  
Old February 8, 2021, 11:57 AM   #16
rodwhaincamo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 7, 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,246
Triple 7s statement to reduce by 15% is to achieve BP velocity. However T7 is virtually identical to velocity of Swiss and Olde Eynsford, both actual BP. There’s no safety issue with using the same volume of T7.
rodwhaincamo is offline  
Old February 8, 2021, 04:45 PM   #17
rodwhaincamo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 7, 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,246
Had looked on their site and found nothing. They used to have a lot of information. So I dug out a bottle I have. Right here on the label (can’t get a clear pic) it states:

“Use by equivalent volume to FFFg black powder in replica muzzleloading firearms deemed safe by a competent gunsmith.”
rodwhaincamo is offline  
Old February 24, 2021, 09:08 AM   #18
bladesmith 1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 14, 2018
Posts: 240
"Suggested Grains (by Volume)" -- which would never have occurred to me, since both grains and grams are units of weight, not volume." AB, I believe most of us think of grains as a measure of volume, not weight, seeing that's how we measure the loads we use. So, grains can be both measured in both weight, OR volume. Maybe I'm miss interpreting your statement. At one time I measured by volume 70grs of 2F and found it was also 70grs by weight. The amount of moisture the powder had already picked up from the air could have played a part in this, but I have to believe that most days they'd about the same. JMHO
bladesmith 1 is offline  
Old February 25, 2021, 07:33 PM   #19
5whiskey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 23, 2005
Location: US
Posts: 3,649
I say go for it in a steel framed NMA of reputable manufacture. I would call newer model piettas and Ubertis reputable. I doubt it blows the gun. I do believe a steady diet of such loads could develop end shake in your revolver. So... you will be safe, but repeated shooting of such heavy loads is ill advised.
__________________
Support the NRA-ILA Auction, ends 03/09/2018

https://thefiringline.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=593946
5whiskey is offline  
Old February 27, 2021, 04:58 PM   #20
TruthTellers
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 22, 2016
Posts: 3,878
A little bit of endshake would allow more space for fouling to accumulate and after a cylinder or two there wouldn't be anymore of it until it's cleaned.

I've shot 40 grains of T7 in my NMA, it's fine. Normally tho I do about 20-25 grains as that's what my CVA flask throws.
__________________
"We always think there's gonna be more time... then it runs out."
TruthTellers is offline  
Old February 28, 2021, 02:57 AM   #21
BluRidgDav
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 13, 2001
Posts: 314
Something that everyone seems to be missing is that the OP is planning to load a revolver with a relatively short cylinder & chambers. Before he gets too far, he's gonna run outta room in each chamber and still be able to fit a ball in there. Revolvers are not like a single shot muzzleloaders which can be loaded with an unreasonable amount of powder until the whole barrel is full. T7 may be slightly more compressible than BP, but, I'd be surprised if you can actually "overload" a cap & ball cylinder with enough BP (or substitute) to do any real damage.
__________________
Watch your top-knot.
BluRidgDav is offline  
Old February 28, 2021, 08:21 AM   #22
arcticap
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2005
Location: Central Connecticut
Posts: 3,166
There wouldn't be a problem with the safety of the cylinder, only possibly some additional wear & tear on the action parts.

Higher powder charges may cause the hammer to blow back and reset.
That will let you know that the chambers were over-loaded beyond normal limits.

Also, under some circumstances the sharper recoil of 777 could cause some balls to creep forward in the chamber,
or some caps to come off the nipples which could lead to a chain fire.

But 35 grains of 777 doesn't sound like an excessive powder charge.
arcticap is offline  
Old March 1, 2021, 02:21 PM   #23
45 Dragoon
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 14, 2013
Posts: 656
Hmm . . . hammer blow back to that extent would lead me to believe I need new nipples. Too large of an orifice.
When I shot Blackpowder, all I shot for the last few years was trip7 . . . full charges . . . in Armys, Navys and Walkers/Dragoons!! Some folks just over think things . . .

Mike
45 Dragoon is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.11227 seconds with 10 queries