The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > Law and Civil Rights

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old December 6, 2010, 11:25 PM   #26
johnwilliamson062
Junior member
 
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Posts: 9,995
I would have kept this quiet until I had the film in hand.
I doubt anything can come of it even if you get the film and it shows the shenanigans, but don't be surprised if your film is misplaced along the way.
johnwilliamson062 is offline  
Old December 8, 2010, 01:40 AM   #27
9mmHP
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 14, 2007
Location: Indiana/Indpls Metro Area
Posts: 318
If it's the video I remember from '86, it should show ol' Charlie laughing and banging his gavel over the the shouts of "NAY."
9mmHP is offline  
Old December 13, 2010, 03:16 PM   #28
AJAX22
Member
 
Join Date: June 2, 2006
Posts: 27


looks like they processed the order.

So the wait continues...
AJAX22 is offline  
Old January 24, 2011, 06:31 PM   #29
AJAX22
Member
 
Join Date: June 2, 2006
Posts: 27
IT IS HERE!!!!

WATCHING IT NOW!!!

WooooooO!!!!

I'm uploading as soon as i can
AJAX22 is offline  
Old January 24, 2011, 08:02 PM   #30
Crosshair
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 16, 2004
Location: Grand Forks, ND
Posts: 5,332
Remember to post a torrent link so I can seed.
__________________
I don't carry a gun to go looking for trouble, I carry a gun in case trouble finds me.
Crosshair is offline  
Old January 24, 2011, 09:23 PM   #31
johnwilliamson062
Junior member
 
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Posts: 9,995
... ... ...
johnwilliamson062 is offline  
Old January 25, 2011, 11:05 AM   #32
Dead
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 5, 2000
Location: AoW Land, USA
Posts: 1,968
Awaiting link...
__________________
Dead [Black Ops]
www.therallypoint.org
Dead is offline  
Old January 25, 2011, 11:38 AM   #33
Al Norris
Staff
 
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,656
Ajax has posted a small segment, here. He is having trouble with his video editing software (so you will get another link when it's in a more "finished" state), but this will give you an idea of what went on.
Al Norris is offline  
Old January 25, 2011, 12:18 PM   #34
Tom Servo
Staff
 
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 12,610
Actually, the video transfer is excellent. Here's a screencap of the vote to include the amendment:



and on final passage:

__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change.
--Randall Munroe
Tom Servo is offline  
Old January 25, 2011, 12:19 PM   #35
AJAX22
Member
 
Join Date: June 2, 2006
Posts: 27
sorry for not posting the link last night, I fell asleep while uploading the raw footage.

as posted above, here is the highlight reel.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6Mx2UcSEvQ
AJAX22 is offline  
Old January 25, 2011, 01:24 PM   #36
Brian Pfleuger
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,436
I'm still a little confused as to what this is supposed to accomplish?

There's nothing new there, the transcript was already available, the method used to insert the amendment is relatively common practice and used by both parties... and both parties have little pretend conniption fits when the other party uses this (and many other) methods.

It all seems entirely inconsequential to me.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives...
...they just don't plan not to.
-Andy Stanley
Brian Pfleuger is offline  
Old January 25, 2011, 05:09 PM   #37
Hatch
Junior Member
 
Join Date: January 25, 2011
Posts: 1
Your wasting your time. It legally passed.

For people looking at the video you need to look at this

Time - 6:47
That is the vote on the motion to attach the Hughes Amendment to the Volkmer Substitute is voted down.


The time expired to discuss the Hughes Amendment at 7:08
This is were the guy gets up and ask for more time to explain and basically doesn't get more time but he does get another VERBAL vote on it.
This is were the Hughes get passed
8:20. They did a verbal vote and it passed. You can hear someone tell him to let it go because he got it.

at 9:44 they did a vote on adding the Volkmer Substitute (as amended) to the Amendment (hr4332 a02)
It passed.

Its all confusing but it did get passed. We got RAILROADED


The screen captures above do not show the vote on the HUGHES AMENDMENT but on the attaching the Amendment that the HUGHES was attached to to the main bill.
The Passage was of the main bill.

They did a Verbal vote on attaching the Hughes to the Volkmer and that was done at 820
Hatch is offline  
Old January 29, 2011, 09:48 PM   #38
WeedWacker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 13, 2006
Location: Body: Clarkston, Washington. Soul: LaCrosse, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,560
So they got a verbal vote after an elctronic struck it down and Wrangle's "opinion" as the chair was that the amendment was added?
__________________
- Jon
Disequilibrium facilitates accommodation.
9mm vs .45 ACP? The answer is .429
WeedWacker is offline  
Reply

Tags
1986 , ban , fopa , hughes amendment , machine gun

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2018 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.06575 seconds with 8 queries