The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The North Corral > Curios and Relics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old December 23, 2019, 03:42 AM   #1
Mikef262
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 23, 2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 319
M1 Carbine

Hey guys,

I recently picked up an m1 carbine at a local gun show for $790. I haven't shot it yet, planning to tomorrow, hopefully it goes better than the Iver Johnson carbine I had.

It is definitely not all original, but after some research, I have learned a bit about the different markers of each part. The reciever and rear sight are Springfield. The hammer is Walt Arsenal. The charging handle is Saginaw. The barrel is marked 10-1943, I assume the 10-1943 indicates the month and year the barrel was made? The barrel band is type 3, I believe, and is marked SA2, which I assume is Springfield. The stock is Jamestown Lounge or Jewel Bros? Not positive on the stock. It has a "J" on one side where the sling wraps through. It also has the letter "P" stamped and circled at the bottom of the grip, and another "P" stamped on the front of the grip, but not circled. The handguard is only marked with a "10", and nothing else.

I realize the Springfield's aren't desired like real carbines. But I do hope this shoots better than the Iver Johnson. First shot with the IJ the handguard flew off...

Anyway, at $790 how did I do?
Mikef262 is offline  
Old December 23, 2019, 07:56 AM   #2
AirForceShooter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 21, 2005
Location: Sarasota (sort of) Florida
Posts: 1,274
Price is about right for the decraibed gun.
M-1 carbines generally are quite reliable.
Combat accuracy is acceptable

Have fun

AFS
__________________
'Qui tacet consentit': To remain silent is to consent.
AirForceShooter is offline  
Old December 23, 2019, 10:49 AM   #3
HiBC
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 13, 2006
Posts: 6,581
I think its a misconception that the typical M-1 carbine rolled out of an arsenal with matching parts.

The parts were farmed out to a number of suppliers,and the rifles from day one might have Inland,Saginaw,IBM,and Quality Parts all in the same gun
HiBC is offline  
Old December 23, 2019, 02:04 PM   #4
44 AMP
Staff
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 20,850
Quote:
It is definitely not all original,...
In what way??

with US military firearms there are two "original" conditions, though perhaps authentic is a better word. There is the configuration of the arm as it was when accepted by the military and first issued. Call that original issue if you want.

Then there is the gun "as maintained in service", which is entirely authentic but can, and often is different from the original issue condition.

Additionally, as mentioned, some guns were never made with parts from a single source. SO, even a gun that was never issued (or reworked) could have parts from different makers and be completely "correct" and absolutely authentic and "real".
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
44 AMP is offline  
Old December 23, 2019, 02:35 PM   #5
T. O'Heir
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 11,844
"...The receiver and rear sight are Springfield..." No such thing as a Springfield receiver. Springfield Arsenal did do Post war rebuilds, but they did not make Carbines.
"...made with parts from a single source..." None of the original Carbine makers made all the parts. Most made very few. Some made receivers and nothing else. A lot of the subcontractors(100's of small shops all over the Eastern Seaboard made Carbine parts) did not mark the parts at all. Hence, there's no such thing as an "original" or "all correct" Carbine.
Rummage around here.
http://www.uscarbinecal30.com/
"...better than the Iver Johnson carbine I had..." IJ's can be like that. IJ bought out both Plainfield Machine Co. and Universal Firearms Co. IJ Plainfields are not as good as original Plainfields. Universals come in early and late models. The Early types are ok. They were made before Universal thought they could improve the design. Those are the Late models(toggle for the bolt hold open, poorly made stamped op handle and 2 return springs) and are junk.
__________________
Spelling and grammar count!
T. O'Heir is offline  
Old December 23, 2019, 03:21 PM   #6
Mikef262
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 23, 2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 319
T.O'Heir,

Perhaps I used the wrong terminology, or there was a miscommunication. But, just below the rear sight on my carbine it is marked, "Springfield Armory". The rear sight covers up the "Springfield" portion of it, but you can see it at an angle. If I could figure out how, if it is possible, to remove the rear sight, I would take a picture.

The rear sight is marked "SA" on the side.
Mikef262 is offline  
Old December 23, 2019, 06:07 PM   #7
Mikef262
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 23, 2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 319
On a new note, I just got back from the range. I fired about 100 rounds of cheap Tula steel cased ammo through it. Normally stay away from steel cased, but the gun shop only had steel, and I wanted to shoot it today. It shot very very well! Only two issues, which were magazine and ammo related. Had an issue with one round of the Tula ammo, and after finishing a magazine, I realized the bottom blew out! Luckily, all parts were recovered, and the mag was reassembled. I am very happy to finally have a functioning carbine!
Mikef262 is offline  
Old December 23, 2019, 06:16 PM   #8
Nodak1858
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 7, 2009
Location: N. Dakota
Posts: 241
I think the confusion is the not all original statement. Springfield didn't make USGI carbines, they did make recievers and assemble rifles from left over USGI parts. So it's a carbine, just not a military receiver based one.

Here's the info on them, had a few incarnations

http://www.m1carbinesinc.com/carbine_springfield.html
__________________
We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on a million typewriters will eventually reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet, we know this is not true.

Last edited by Nodak1858; December 23, 2019 at 06:23 PM.
Nodak1858 is offline  
Old December 23, 2019, 09:27 PM   #9
4V50 Gary
Staff
 
Join Date: November 2, 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 20,608
Must be a post-war repro with some GI parts. Does it shoot well? B/Ct that's the bottom line. Enjoy.
__________________
Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt. Molon Labe!
4V50 Gary is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2018 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.06633 seconds with 10 queries