The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: General

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old November 30, 2018, 02:34 PM   #26
Mike38
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 28, 2009
Location: North Central Illinois
Posts: 2,710
I'm not so sure "jumping" late into the AR market made that much difference. They probably didn't manufacture / machine one part for their AR line, most companies don't. I worked at a place near me that machined AR15 parts. They don't make a completed rifle under their name, they make them for other companies. Lots of other companies. Ruger, S&W, Bushmaster, Colt, etc. etc. They have four benches in the packaging dept. Pallets and totes and boxes filled up with AR parts, then boxed into other companies labels. I watched one day, a lady placing AR parts into a box with the Ruger logo on it, sealed it, grabbed a box with the Smith & Wesson logo on it and filled it from the very same tote the Ruger parts came from. They are all the same parts! The only thing different is the logo stamped on the receiver. And the receivers are made in the same place, on the same machine, by the same operator, just stamped differently after it comes out of the CNC machine. Sure, some companies have "specialized parts" only available on their AR, but most are generic, coming from only a handful of "no name" companies.
Mike38 is offline  
Old November 30, 2018, 07:41 PM   #27
Art Eatman
Staff in Memoriam
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
A problem for rifle companies who focus or who have focussed on bolt-action hunting rifles is two-fold: First, a hunting rifle lasts beyond a lifetime. Second, the percentage of the population which hunts with bolt-action rifles is not growing to any notable degree.

It seems to me that this leads to all manner of shenanigans to maintain a profitable rate of sales. Tricky names on slightly different models of some rifle; internal cost-cutting, etc.
Art Eatman is offline  
Old November 30, 2018, 08:36 PM   #28
std7mag
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 23, 2013
Location: Central Taxylvania..
Posts: 3,609
Egads, this reeks of Harley Davidson!
Slightly different paint color is a new model.
And a production company should not have more lawyers on the payroll than engineers.
__________________
When our own government declares itself as "tyrannical", where does that leave us??!!

"Januarary 6th insurrection".
Funny, I didn't see a single piece of rope...
std7mag is offline  
Old December 1, 2018, 04:12 AM   #29
bamaranger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 9, 2009
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 8,312
Who's in charge of this outfit?

I probably wouldn't be a success as a CEO, away hunting and fishing too much. Heck, I barely kept my ranger job!!!

But I do think that a gun company should make guns and ammo, ....period. When you see firearms mfg's companies branching out into other markets, I take it as a warning sign. We can't sell enough guns, so lets sell, clothes, cleaning supplies, knives boots....you name it. Pretty soon the outfits up for sale.

Colt is an example of a company that got out of touch with its consumers, and Bill Ruger Sr., cashed in big time with the SA revolver. Remington went the multi product route, and in my book their firearms have not been the same since (1980's?). Winchester went multiproduct, and is gone as we once knew them too.

I sure don't think we need another price point poly rifle. There are so many now, I can't keep up. And I wonder......could the advent of the pricepoint rifle be more driven by the greed of mfg's and CEO's to overly maximize profit? Labor and materials are high priced items these days, and I have no basis for that other than common sense. Everything costs more. But at least on the surface, the boutique custom and semicustom shops that turn out good, higher priced guns, still are doing fine. Kimber, Cooper, Bergara and likely others still make good, hiqh quality guns, and folks plunk down lots of cash to own them.
bamaranger is offline  
Old December 1, 2018, 12:23 PM   #30
old roper
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 11, 2007
Posts: 2,155
might want to read this

https://www.bicycleretailer.com/indu...d#.XALDUuJlA64

In case you don't read it

In the quarter, sales were $571 million, down 1 percent from the prior-year quarter. The company said the decline was caused by lower prices across all ammunition categories due to market conditions, and lower sales in hydration, optics and water sports. It said those declines were partially offset by increased firearms sales due to a product refresh and improved sales in outdoor cooking and its sports protection business.
__________________
Semper Fi
Vietnam 1965
VFW Life member
NRA Life Member

Last edited by old roper; December 1, 2018 at 01:07 PM.
old roper is offline  
Old December 1, 2018, 11:50 PM   #31
J.G. Terry
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 24, 2014
Posts: 577
There was a piece in the paper earlier in the week the firearms sales were down 10%. That's a pretty bad hit across the board. I have several Savage bolt action 110's. You can see the improvement is fit and finish over the years. My entry level rifle is a Ruger American. If we had a particle machine we could make an American. We'd drop an Brown A bolt and Tikka T3 into our machine and a Ruger American would fall out. On the down side look at the Axis compared to Ruger, Marlin, Mossberg and T/C entry level rifles.
__________________
Intentionally Antagonizing Another MemberInsults and Ad Hominems
J.G. Terry is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.03970 seconds with 8 queries