|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 14, 2009, 02:01 AM | #2276 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 26, 2006
Location: North Florida
Posts: 152
|
Thanks again Jim!
|
December 14, 2009, 08:23 AM | #2277 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 20, 2009
Location: Overlooking the Baker River Valley
Posts: 1,727
|
Christobal65: That's a .22 Ladysmith 1st Model, made from 1902 to 1906. It's built on the "M" frame, which is the smallest frame used for S&W Hand Ejectors. According to SCSW, the SN range was from 1 to 4575, so presumably that's how many were made. Prices range from a few hundred $ to a few thousand $, depending on condition.
|
December 14, 2009, 09:45 AM | #2278 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 23, 2000
Posts: 500
|
Jim, I have a S&W 36 square butt serial number 446619 in blue. I figured mid sixties somewhere.
|
December 14, 2009, 01:05 PM | #2279 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 1, 2005
Posts: 4,443
|
Quote:
Jim |
|
December 14, 2009, 01:47 PM | #2280 |
Junior Member
Join Date: December 13, 2009
Posts: 3
|
Sweet thanks, here are some pics of the .22 we have.
|
December 14, 2009, 03:29 PM | #2281 |
Junior Member
Join Date: December 12, 2009
Posts: 4
|
Just curious, what are those grips made of and do you know where to get a set?
Thanks |
December 17, 2009, 01:21 AM | #2282 |
Junior Member
Join Date: December 17, 2009
Posts: 2
|
Early Regulation Police?
My father has a K frame with a serial number of 1587xx.
I know it is a hand ejector, chambered in .38 S&W Special, with the fixed sights (blade front), center diamond grips with gold crests, S&W trade mark on the right side, with the S&W markings to include patents (last one= Sep 14. 09 It is in pretty good condition with solid bluing (mior "pitting"), some holster wear, a few very fine scratches, and clean bore. Could you please help me with proper identification, date of production, and approximate value? I'm also researching a few of his other weapons that he has from his elders. So far I've worked on his 1915 Winchester Model '94, a 1938 Hunter Arms "The Fulton" 16ga SxS, his 1950 Colt Detective Special .38. I'm working on this Smith and just out of curiosity also an Iver Johnson Arms and Cycle Works break action .32 hammerless 5 shot revolver. Thank you! Troy |
December 17, 2009, 06:34 AM | #2283 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 13, 2001
Posts: 449
|
Jake Chandler:
The grips are vulcanised (hard) rubber. They were the standard grip on your gun, as I mentioned over at THR. Your best bet would be to check with Numrich: http://www.e-gunparts.com/ Christobal65: Depending on mechanical condition your gun would probably be considered good to very good condition. In 2006 the Standard Catalog of S&W gave a value of $450 to $600. Please note that these guns were chambered in .22 long, not .22 long rifle and are known to crack the forcing cone when shot with .22lr. If you can't find .22 shorts or longs to shoot through it, it would be best not to shoot it at all. TK14SS: You have a .38 Military & Police Model of 1905 3rd Change manufactured between 1909 & 1915, serial number range was 146900 to 241703. In 2006 the Standard Catalog of S&W gave values of $285 to $385 for very good to excellent condition. Note that this gun was made before heat treating of cylinders and it would be prudent to only shoot it with standard velocity lead ammunition. It also lacks the modern hammer block safety so there is a very small risk that it could discharge if dropped on the hammer. Best to keep the hammer down on an empty chamber if it is kept loaded. |
December 17, 2009, 11:15 AM | #2284 |
Junior Member
Join Date: December 17, 2009
Posts: 2
|
Thank you very much sir!
|
December 18, 2009, 07:01 AM | #2285 |
Junior Member
Join Date: November 8, 2008
Posts: 9
|
S&W J-Frame Stainless Chiefs Special Stainless
Serial # ALA8347 |
December 18, 2009, 08:47 AM | #2286 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 20, 2009
Location: Overlooking the Baker River Valley
Posts: 1,727
|
Quote:
|
|
December 18, 2009, 12:28 PM | #2287 |
Junior Member
Join Date: December 18, 2009
Posts: 2
|
DOB
I would appreciate help knowing year of manufacture for my Highway Patrolman:
N 596XXX Also, any estimates of value for a 9 out of 10 condition level?? |
December 18, 2009, 01:57 PM | #2288 |
Junior Member
Join Date: November 8, 2008
Posts: 9
|
Sweet. I was born Dec1 of 85. So would this Stainless 1985 m60 be safe with the hottest +P .38special? Does it take standard J-frame grips? Are there any quirks about this era model?
I only payed 329 OTD but its a little rough. Looks like it was carried ALLOT but shot a little. Some new grips and the stainless will polish right up. Its still very tight. The cylinder face and cylinder rings aren't very stained and the rifling and forcing cone are still bright and sharp with no powder or jacket fouling. Thanks |
December 18, 2009, 05:13 PM | #2289 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 13, 2001
Posts: 449
|
TX Shooter:
1978 to 1980. In 2006 the Standard Catalog of S&W gave a value of $375 in excellent condition. |
December 18, 2009, 05:17 PM | #2290 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 13, 2001
Posts: 449
|
adam731432:
The first plus P rated Model 60 came out in 1990. Accepted internet wisdom (ie use at your own risk) is that limited use of Plus P in a early model won't harm the gun, regular use will accelerate wear. For the grips, jany round butt J frame grip will fit. If yours is a 60-1 with a three inch heavy barrel and square butt then you will need to look for square but grips. |
December 19, 2009, 11:04 AM | #2291 |
Junior Member
Join Date: December 18, 2009
Posts: 2
|
Thanks very much Radagast!
|
December 19, 2009, 04:24 PM | #2292 |
Junior Member
Join Date: November 8, 2008
Posts: 9
|
I thought mine had the .38/magnum frame and cylinder length but i could be wrong.
I didn't see a -1 on the yoke. The bottom of the the grip frame is flat but with slightly rounded corners. A set of modern 2009 grips from my 642 and 360 airweights fit perfectly. What would that make it? Do you think a steady diet of the FBI lead HPSWC would hurt? |
December 19, 2009, 05:06 PM | #2293 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 1, 2005
Posts: 4,443
|
Quote:
Jim |
|
December 19, 2009, 05:17 PM | #2294 |
Junior Member
Join Date: December 16, 2009
Posts: 14
|
Year of manufacture for S@W model 36 .38 special?
Can anyone please tell me the year of manufacture fora S@W model 36 serial number J825xxx. Thanks in advance.
|
December 19, 2009, 06:01 PM | #2295 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 1, 2005
Posts: 4,443
|
Quote:
Jim |
|
December 19, 2009, 07:28 PM | #2296 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 13, 2001
Posts: 449
|
adam731432: You have a round butt gun, and possibly you could harm the gun. Certainly regular use of plus P will wear the components and throw the timing out faster than standard pressure ammo. If you want to shoot plus P on a regular basis, buy a 60-7 or later gun. Yours is a 60 'no dash' and has not been reinforced for the heavier loads.
|
December 20, 2009, 12:11 AM | #2297 |
Junior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2009
Posts: 1
|
This looks like a newer S&W 41 serial UGK2xxx that I am thinking of purchasing anyone help me with age?
thanks |
December 20, 2009, 02:45 AM | #2298 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 13, 2001
Posts: 449
|
adluginb:
The serial number ranges in the Standard Catalog of S&W are not conrehensive for auto pistols. They do note than UAMxxxx shipped in 1997, so it's probable your gun would be after that, but as to when I can't say. |
December 20, 2009, 04:04 AM | #2299 |
Member
Join Date: December 14, 2009
Posts: 38
|
S&W 27
Jim
have a cherry S&W Mdl 27 3 1/2" Blue, smooth trigger, semi target hammer. Ser # N-2154XX also a S%W Mdl 629-5 Mountain gun Round butt . both were gifts from an uncle who passed. |
December 20, 2009, 11:54 AM | #2300 |
Junior Member
Join Date: December 16, 2009
Posts: 14
|
Thanks Jim for the S@W model 36 date of manufacture, Iappreciate it.
|
Tags |
s&w 686 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|