|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: What do you predict will happen on the Federal level? (Choose all that apply) | |||
Completely outlaw all guns (except for Government and rare cases) | 3 | 8.11% | |
Repeal 2nd Amendment to U.S. Constitution | 4 | 10.81% | |
Overturn Columbia v Heller | 1 | 2.70% | |
Overturn McDonald v Chicago | 1 | 2.70% | |
Gun registration for all guns | 15 | 40.54% | |
Increase tax on guns and/or ammunition | 28 | 75.68% | |
Increase size and number of gun free zones | 15 | 40.54% | |
Make it generally more difficult for legitimate gun stores to operate | 27 | 72.97% | |
Expand violations and increase punishment for gun owning, carrying and/or transport | 18 | 48.65% | |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 23, 2014, 11:19 PM | #26 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 8, 2012
Posts: 2,556
|
Quote:
|
|
March 23, 2014, 11:30 PM | #27 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Quote:
A reversal of Heller would also be a reversal of McDonald, and neither of those seems likely.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|
March 24, 2014, 12:08 PM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 8, 2012
Posts: 2,556
|
Beyond which, We'd have to put a case in front of them. If the court were going to shift like that, people would stop pushing cases to the Court like the States and their reluctance to do so lately. Madigan, San Diego sheriff etc.
|
March 24, 2014, 11:17 PM | #29 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 2, 2013
Posts: 975
|
Quote:
|
|
March 24, 2014, 11:31 PM | #30 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 2, 2013
Posts: 975
|
Quote:
|
|
March 25, 2014, 01:35 AM | #31 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Quote:
No body of human beings is completely impartial, and they're no doubt aware of the scrutiny they've attracted over the last decade.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
|
March 25, 2014, 10:02 AM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
I read a recent law book on the justices' decision processes. The best predictor is their political orientation. They look for past precedents that support these.
There is a uncertainty interval around their core positions, so it is not absolute. Another is that one justice or so might see themselves as a kingpin and varies positions from ideology to wield power. My bet (worth what you paid for it) is that the current court thinks they did their job on the 2nd Amend. and will not take up any grand game changers.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
March 25, 2014, 11:01 AM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 8, 2012
Posts: 2,556
|
So they would decline to hear Peruta if it got there?
|
March 25, 2014, 04:16 PM | #34 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
I'm not Rasputin or Nostradamus but I don't see the fire in the belly for more RKBA expansion out of them.
Here's an interesting piece with an intriguing analysis at the end. http://www.marketwatch.com/story/car...5?pagenumber=2 Quote:
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
|
March 25, 2014, 05:14 PM | #35 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 8, 2012
Posts: 2,556
|
That's an interesting take, considering the projections in the Peruta thread itself on the size and scope of the circuit splits.
|
March 27, 2014, 12:08 AM | #36 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 6, 2012
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 1,057
|
I don't really see any of those happening, at least not within the next several election cycles.
That being said, I admit that have nothing but a seething hatred for the federal government, so I am probably biased in my opinion.
__________________
NRA Lifetime Member Since 1999 "I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people except for a few public officials." George Mason |
March 27, 2014, 09:38 PM | #37 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 25, 2013
Posts: 317
|
Quote:
And I also don't complete agree with the NRA, and consider their occasionally pushing positions on non gun issues, including ones I disagree with them on problematic. I think Lapeirre was a classic case of wrongly using language and arguments for the troops out in the general public, where it was damaging. I think the NRA should have publically repudiated Nugent. BUT, I worked in DC for decades. Strategic and tactical mistakes by advocacy groups are the norm. But lack of support by their constituency is harmful to the constituency's interests. supporting a group because that is what we have does not mean you support everything. If that were the case no one would support the DNC or RNC, the ACLU, moveon, greenpeace, AIPAC, NEA, NAR (realtors), UAW the Chamber of Commerce, or any group with influence Last edited by TDL; March 27, 2014 at 10:06 PM. |
|
|
|