|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 3, 2012, 01:49 PM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 281
|
We just had a big 22 long rifle shoot in Missouri with 22 rifles and handguns. I took four 22 pistols a Ruger Mark III with a Burris 2x handgun scope and a Ruger Mark III with a Ultradot Red Dot Scope and a Browning Buckmark and a Sig Trailside with iron sights. Took four Ruger 10/22 rifles and a CZ 511 rifle all with scopes others brought a Browning semi auto, a Mossberg bolt action and a vintage Remington pump action.
We tried out various 22 ammo and had a blast with a lot of rounds going downrange, I love the 22 long rifle round but it would be near my last choice for self defense. That being said I have two women friends who are using it for self defense, they are getting their concealed weapons permits and are shooting CCI stingers, one has the new Ruger SR22 pistol and the other lady has not bought a handgun yet. They both were at the shoot and on close self defense ranges at human torso targets shooting dead center mass they were keeping most of the rounds on target shooting speed drills. As with any caliber advised them to keep shooting until the threat was no longer a threat and then no longer shoot, which may or may not take longer with a 22 caliber weapon. I am hoping as they get comfortable shooting that they graduate to a 9mm or 38 Special, but even if they do not, it is comforting to know they are carrying a firearm and learning self defense.
__________________
Life Member,,,Military Order of the Purple Heart, Veterans of Foreign Wars, American Legion, Amvets, Disabled American Veterans, 173rd Airborne Skysoldier Association, National Rifle Association, Member,,,IDPA, USPSA, Iowa Sheriffs and Deputies Association,,Website http://www.handgunholsters.net |
November 3, 2012, 02:26 PM | #27 | |
Member
Join Date: June 4, 2008
Posts: 67
|
Quote:
|
|
November 3, 2012, 02:28 PM | #28 | |
Member
Join Date: June 4, 2008
Posts: 67
|
Quote:
|
|
November 3, 2012, 02:44 PM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 281
|
"Perhaps suggest they lose the Stingers and use 40 grain solids. Less noise and flash, with more penetration." Quote by Elmer
Roger that Elmer. The gals had tried a variety of 22 ammo through the Ruger SR22 and even though Ruger claims it will function reliably with all ammo, they claimed CCI Stingers were the most reliable. I just use Federal Valu Pack and I prefer 22 long rifle ammo in the 1200 fps range but I do not use 22 long rifle for self defense. By the way Federal Value pack is 4 cents a round and Stingers are 13 cents a round. Since the gals wanted the CCI Stingers I looked at probably a dozen ammo sites for them and they were out or backordered, finally found them at Cabelas for $65 for 500 rounds and ordered 4000 rounds.
__________________
Life Member,,,Military Order of the Purple Heart, Veterans of Foreign Wars, American Legion, Amvets, Disabled American Veterans, 173rd Airborne Skysoldier Association, National Rifle Association, Member,,,IDPA, USPSA, Iowa Sheriffs and Deputies Association,,Website http://www.handgunholsters.net |
November 3, 2012, 03:26 PM | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2009
Location: Back in a Non-Free State
Posts: 3,133
|
The 22LR cartirdge has its place in the SD arsenal. It would not be my first choice for nightstand or even CC, but if I ever had to get out of Dodge, I would carry a thousand rounds with me along with a Ruger Charger.
__________________
Simple as ABC . . . Always Be Carrying |
November 3, 2012, 05:13 PM | #31 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 11, 2004
Location: Redwood City, Ca.
Posts: 4,114
|
From SeekerTwo:
Quote:
The problem with the 22 for self defense is that it is far less likely to stop violent aggressive action "right now" than many other rounds. It is more likely, several times over, that an aggressor will take multiple hits from a 22 and show no immediate effect, than with a number of other self defense calibers. So if a person can, choose the round that will be more likely to cause violent action against you to be stopped right away rather than minutes or hours later. The old adage that you should look to get a gun that you can shoot well in the most powerful round you can handle and still shoot well in a gun that is matched to it's purpose, is true. If you want a small hideout gun and the 22 is all you can handle well then go for it. But in guns of the same size you can chamber more potent rounds so why not take those? 22 WMR, 32 H&R, 32 Magnum, 32 acp in a Seecamp or Berretta, 380acp, 32 NAA, 9mm Makarov, etc. A 22 and a thousand rounds is good to have anywhere. But that and something that tends to stop folks sooner, is much more powerful and breaks bone when it hits, is better still. tipoc Last edited by tipoc; November 3, 2012 at 05:20 PM. |
|
November 3, 2012, 06:24 PM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2,313
|
I consider the 22LR to be a viable SD cartridge in the proper firearm using good quality proven ammo. It is an experts SD cartridge and must be used resolutely and with precision.
One good example of a suitable SD 22 pistol would be the Beretta Model 70, which has combat history with the Mossad. Another might be the Ruger SR22. It is combat configured with good sights and a decent trigger...Mine has proven 100% reliable and very accurate. Loaded with MiniMag solids, in the hands of a person who has spent hours shooting thousands of rounds...let's just say I wouldn't want to face that regardless of what more conventional SD caliber pistol was in my hand.
__________________
The past is gone...the future may never happen. Be Here Now. |
November 3, 2012, 07:31 PM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 9, 2004
Posts: 5,173
|
"If you are lucky enough to travel around the world armed and doing it mainly alone do yourself a favor always carry a .22 pistol, regardless of anything else you pack."
How many of us can travel the world with any type of firearm, especially these days? I could copy and paste other passages from this post, but that would only reinforce the idiocy. Yes, the .22LR has a place. It is not in your /James Bond/idiotic Hollywood fantasy. |
November 3, 2012, 07:41 PM | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 11, 2004
Location: Redwood City, Ca.
Posts: 4,114
|
Some information regarding how the Mossad used the 22 lr cartridge from a handgun is available on the internet and other sources. It was not used primarily as a combat or defensive round. It was used for assassinations. Meaning that they literally walked up to unsuspecting folks and shot them multiple times in the head at point blank range. The guns so used were sometimes suppressed. The low report of the 22 made them useful for this type work.
There are a few instances of the 22 being used in gunfights. In some cases successfully. But again, rarely. The Mossad and the IDF standard caliber for defense and combat was and is the 9mm. No army or law enforcement agency issues the 22 as a primary duty sidearm. The Berretta Model 70 weighs close to a pound and a half and is over 6" in length. Some 22 pistols (the High Standard for example) were used by the U.S. military and other armies from suppressed handguns to remove sentries during and after WWII. But here again this was head shots from relatively close range and from hiding. Not from open combat or intended for gun fighting. They were also provided for some pilots as survival tools in the case of forced downing. Here again though the idea was to hunt small game or to signal, not for combat. tipoc Last edited by tipoc; November 3, 2012 at 07:54 PM. |
November 3, 2012, 08:02 PM | #35 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 31, 2002
Location: Deep in the Heart of the Lone Star State (TX)
Posts: 2,169
|
tipoc: So.....shooting someone in the head area with a .22lr for close-range assasination purposes is effective, but shooting someone in the head with a .22lr for self-defense is ineffective?
Also, I don't hear anyone suggesting that the .22lr pistol is the best choice for a gunfight....for me, the 12ga. is minimum caliber for that. Anything in a pistol caliber is, to paraphrase another TFL member, the starting pistol for this fat man's mad dash away from danger. If what I have with me is a .22lr pistol, I won't abandon all hope, either. And I'll try to manage the situation where, if I ever have to shoot a BG, it won't be a gunfight.....I aim to cheat. amd6547: Good insight. The .22lr is definitely not a beginners pistol. Then again, neither is the .38/.357 j-frame snub. And how many times have beginners here gotten that advice?..... But, the .22lr medium-frame pistols and revolvers make great beginners guns that can also be pressed into service as SD weapons. Ten rounds from a 617 or 22/45 can definitely change the immediate desires of any BG.....
__________________
Proud member of Gun Culture 2.0...... |
November 3, 2012, 09:46 PM | #36 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2009
Location: Back in a Non-Free State
Posts: 3,133
|
Quote:
Most folks would not hesitate to carry a snub in 38 for SD, but I'm not sure if they are aware that a 40gr Solid LRN Agulia Interceptor round (this is what I use for non-plinking) from a 10 inch barreled Ruger Charger 10/22 carries as much energy as a range / wadcutter 38 special load or a little less energy than a SD standard pressure 38 special load. Not many of us feel naked carrying a snub in 38 special, though.
__________________
Simple as ABC . . . Always Be Carrying |
|
November 4, 2012, 09:35 AM | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 20, 2009
Location: SC Missouri
Posts: 663
|
I am not an advocate of a 22 for selt defense if you can use anything else bigger.
With that said I do carry my LCR-22, 617 S&W, and 4" MK III some of the time, as does my brother. Not everyone who conceal carrys does so worrying about being jumped by thugs. I shoot my concealed carry handguns several times each year while carrying. I shoot Copperheads, CottonMouths and Rattle Snake If I get the chance to. Then we have a deer or whatever seriously injured my vehicles that need finished off. An Armodillo now and again, etc. I find lots of things to shoot at over the course of a year in my rural area. Not to mention plinking opertunities. I live in a low threat area, and I still carry daily. I shoot in Defensive Pistol and 2 gun matches. We have a Rimfire Division in Defensive Handgun, and the 22 is a legal BUG round also. In BUG I normally shoot both my 442 and LCR-22. I shoot my MK III and 617 in Rimfire Division some also. In 2 Gun I shoot my MK III and a Tactical Solutions AR15-22 Upper. We have lots of rimfire entries just due to ammunition expense. Normally everyone makes multiple runs on the course. We charge $10 for the first entry, and $5 for all additional entries. Almost everyone makes atleast 3 runs. As range staff I get to do my fair share of target pasting. We double tap all targets in the match. The rimfire shooters will have lots of double tap rounds that a single target paster will cover both bullet holes. Not common at all with centerfire. A 22 can get the job done with multiple hits. For a survival gun, you can afford to have enough 22 rimfire on hand to feel well armed. Most of us will never stock pile enough centerfire for any serious long term use. Just a matter of $$$. I just picked up another 550 pak of Federal last night at Wal-Mart. I was not low on shells, I just picked up another box, they store well in a Fat 50 ammo can. The 22 is not a bad choice to carry in a low threat area, where varmints are the main targets of your rounds. Better close and head to the Gun Show. Bob |
November 4, 2012, 02:44 PM | #38 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 11, 2004
Location: Redwood City, Ca.
Posts: 4,114
|
Quote:
One: It's not as easy to shoot someone in the head during a rough and tumble fight than some sometimes think it will be. It's easy to make a head shot when the fella is stationary and you are close to them or you have time for a good aim. Not so easy when both shooter and shootee are moving. The head is a small and bony target. This is one reason we are trained to shoot center of mass. Two: We spend a lot of time in self defense speaking and training about the importance of shooting to stop aggressive action. In the ranking of calibers more likely to stop a violent person with several shots the .22 is down towards the bottom of that list. It does not penetrate as deeply as service calibers nor disrupt as much tissue. The 22 is a deadly caliber, but not as deadly as others. Three: A .22 may be just as much a deterrent as any other gun. It could be. But it's not wise in my opinion to count on any gun being a deterrent. You don't carry a gun in the hopes it will be a deterrent. You carry for the time you will need to shoot it to stop someone from being violent to you or others. Don't count on shooting a fella in the butt and he will stop. Assume it won't work and act accordingly. Four: Most folk who want to carry a gun for self defense or want one for home defense, and who will likely ask our opinions on the matter, are not trained fighters, James Bond Jr. or master assassins. I think we can be more realistic. A round with more pop than the 22 will likely do better. I don't recommend the 22 for that role. Five: We emphasize the importance of good shot placement. The reality in defensive encounters is that the majority of shots that hit are less than very well placed. There are more near misses from vital areas than hits on vital areas. This is another reason that rounds other than the 22 are better suited for self defense, they simply do more damege when they do hit. I've carried a Ruger Bearcat, my Mark II, a Browning Buckmark, a S&W M17 and others while out hunting or hiking or around camp etc. They have a role and I've used them. But for defense against humans there are better choices I believe. Fellas will carry what they like. If you feel the 22 is just as good as a the .380, 9mm, 38Spl., etc have at it. tipoc |
|
November 4, 2012, 05:09 PM | #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 31, 2002
Location: Deep in the Heart of the Lone Star State (TX)
Posts: 2,169
|
tipoc: OK, by the numbers....
1. We train for center mass shots. We also train for "failure to stop" drills like the Mozambique Drill....two to the chest, one (or more) to the head. Guess we train for head shots, too... 2. Granted....but, as you said, the .22lr is a lethal round. 3. Granted....but the same has been said for any handgun. Show me any handgun, and there will be stories of how it failed to stop a BG. 4 & 5. So, most handgun owners aren't HSLD operators....kinda obvious a point. But how do shooters get better? Practice, practice, practice. And what will encourage new shooters to practice?.....ammo that costs $15/50rds or ammo that costs $15/500rds? And, if a shooter can shoot .22lr best, how would saddling them with a heavier-recoiling, harder to shoot handgun be any advantage? Shot placement is key, remember? How about letting shooters shoot a gun that will save their lives long enough for them to learn how to shoot something more effective?
__________________
Proud member of Gun Culture 2.0...... |
November 5, 2012, 02:33 AM | #40 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: December 11, 2004
Location: Redwood City, Ca.
Posts: 4,114
|
Quote:
Good to see you acknowledge that there are more effective rounds for self defense than the 22. So why not recommend those rounds? The question we're discussing isn't what to train with. You asked what we thought of the .22 lr as a self defense round. Not what we think of it as a training round. My opinion is that there are better rounds for self defense than the 22 and I don't recommend it for that purpose unless a person has nothing else, can't afford anything else or if a physical condition necessitates it. That's the issue, do you recommend to new shooters that they rely on the 22l.r. for self defense and as a carry gun for defense against other persons? I don't and I explained why. There are better rounds that increase a fellas chance of surviving a deadly encounter. A simple thing. Quote:
Now you asked for people's opinions. You have them. You can see their reasoning. You're under no obligation to agree with it. Do different if you want to. tipoc |
||
November 5, 2012, 06:02 AM | #41 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: August 31, 2002
Location: Deep in the Heart of the Lone Star State (TX)
Posts: 2,169
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Proud member of Gun Culture 2.0...... |
||
November 5, 2012, 06:22 AM | #42 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 9, 1998
Location: Ohio USA
Posts: 8,563
|
Quote:
Perfect practice makes perfect. I stand on the $15/50 side of the fence as being the better choice for perfect practice. When something is more expensive to use - the added cost of the item makes a person tend to pay attention more to how they use it. That's true from owning your own house vs renting, right on down the line to ammo for practice. It's got nothing to do with "trigger time" & everything to do with "quality" time. |
|
November 5, 2012, 06:57 AM | #43 |
Junior Member
Join Date: September 17, 2012
Posts: 7
|
I totally agree that a 22 isn't a preferred SD round, but, if its what ya got, its better then the BG's knife. now if he has anything higher in cal then what you have, well you really better hope he isn't a good shot.
personally i would much rather carry a 22 then nothing, but if i had the choice i would carry a 38 or 9mm, some very basic facts are, even a 22 is loud enough to call attention to the fact that a gun has been fired, most times when you will need it outside of your home will be in a populated environment, like a city where you have come from some show or dinner, shopping whatever, point being, a gun shot much less several will draw attention, and police. and a 22 pistol is plenty loud enough to do that. and lets face it, any situation where you needed a gun is going to go down in very few ways, surprised and unable to do anything but grapple with your attacker hopefully drawing your gun and shooting anywhere they are. or you will see it coming and be able to draw your gun and aim. even in one of the shootings that seems to happen all to often anymore, unless your near the shooter you will have time to take cover and draw, and in most of those cases the shooters were wearing body armor of some kind, your 9mm or 38 in my case wont do any more good then a 22 in that situation so your best bet is to still get away. they make some really nasty 22 ammo these days, at gander mountain of all places i saw pre segmented hollow points will it stop the BG on first or even 3rd shot, probably not, but unless you hit a instantly lethal area with something of higher cal, they wont either, shot is shot, anyone that can shrug off being shot, isn't likely to care about cal. if your normal but still going to commit a crime being shot or even shot at, will usually be enough to cause you to run, if you can take a hit, your not normal and nothing short of a fatal shot will get the job done. while i would want more, if its all i had, i would be very happy to have it, cause it has more reach then my fists and more ammo then throwing my knife |
November 5, 2012, 07:13 AM | #44 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 19, 2012
Location: Somewhere out there
Posts: 184
|
A.22lr is about 10times better than throwing rocks and sticks!
__________________
12 Gauge Fury! |
November 5, 2012, 07:26 AM | #45 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 31, 2002
Location: Deep in the Heart of the Lone Star State (TX)
Posts: 2,169
|
Quote:
Also, how much will someone improve over the course of 50 rounds? Even the best instructors have a 250-500 round minimum for even basic training. Perfect practice may make perfect, but any practice is better than none. And the affordability of .22lr ammo makes practice more likely. 53rdcard: Well said, sir.
__________________
Proud member of Gun Culture 2.0...... |
|
November 5, 2012, 08:06 AM | #46 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 20, 2009
Location: Dallas / Fort Worth Area
Posts: 678
|
Mossad used Beretta 70S & Beretta 71
Fast / fun read http://www.tactical-life.com/online/...mossad-22-lrs/
__________________
Don Davis |
November 5, 2012, 10:44 AM | #47 |
Member
Join Date: February 24, 2012
Posts: 71
|
Whether the blog author is a real spook is up for debate.
I for one see the .22lr as a very limited use SD gun, for me a pocket .22lr pistol Incase something keeps me from carrying and using my pocket .380’s is about as far as I’d go. The popular belief that a .22lr pistol is some type of standalone survival firearm is funny to me and I’d only carry one as a backup to a shotgun or rifle. |
|
|