The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Revolver Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old July 30, 2020, 07:00 AM   #26
Buckeye!
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 1, 2008
Posts: 849
686 Plus or GP100 I guess you heard that enough.... My advice is to inspect both closely before purchasing... QC is a thing of the past
Buckeye! is offline  
Old July 30, 2020, 09:24 AM   #27
BillM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 20, 2009
Location: Amity Oregon
Posts: 791
If you want to shoot IPSC and 9mm, there are really only 2 choices.
S&W 929 or Ruger 5066.

If you decide to go the .357 route, a 627 S&W? I shoot a 627
with short colt brass in USPSA revolver.

If IPSC wasn't in the mix, I always have one suggestion for a first
revolver (and for the "Everybody should have at least one") revolver:

K frame size 6 shot 357 Magnum. 4" with adjustable sights. Ruger, S&W,
whatever. Shoot anything from cowboy bunny fart loads to full house 357.

Personally I'm partial to older pinned and recessed Smith and Wessons.
A nice Model 19 makes me smile.
BillM is offline  
Old July 30, 2020, 10:56 AM   #28
dgang
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 14, 2000
Location: Colorado
Posts: 204
Like most others that got into reloading I started with a .357. Easy to reload in powder puff .38 wad cutters up to powerhouse 170gr.-180 gr hunting loads. Lots of room to experiment Cast bullets help keep the cost down and no scrambling around for the brass. Good luck.
__________________
I shoot, therefore I am.
dgang is offline  
Old July 31, 2020, 11:24 AM   #29
Reloadron
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 8, 2016
Location: Cleveland, Ohio Suburbs
Posts: 1,750
Well live and learn I was not aware of the Canadian law on barrel length. Interesting stuff. I guess part of what you get will involve cost. Personally I like the S&W older guns and blued steel but that's just my taste. I also like the S&W Model 19 or the 586 and when a pocket book permits the Models 27 and 28 are both nice heavier frame guns. I also like the Ruger revolvers so what this comes down to is how any given revolver feels in your hands since after all this will be your gun and your wallet.

Ron
Reloadron is offline  
Old August 8, 2020, 11:32 AM   #30
dgang
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 14, 2000
Location: Colorado
Posts: 204
Quote:
Originally Posted by pathdoc View Post
SPECIFICATION

Intended use: Casual shooting, possibly IPSC revolver.

Restrictions: I live in Canada, so ultra-compact revolvers are off the table (minimum barrel length is at least 4 inches IIRC) and self-defence use is not a consideration. The silver lining is that I don't have to be able to wear it all day, it doesn't have to be concealable, and I can carry it holstered openly when on the range.

Considerations for calibre: I have all the necessary gear for reloading 9mm, and have considered a 9mm Parabellum revolver for commonality. I could down-load 9mm for low recoil without cycling issues, but this raises the issue of what happens if light loads meant for the revolver end up in the automatic - not dangerous, just frustrating.

The alternatives, therefore, are .357 Magnum and .38 Special. A .357 Magnum revolver suggests itself due to being able to use both types of ammunition, but can the experienced hands tell me if there is any downside at all with feeding a .357 a steady diet of .38 Special? The only downside of this is the need to buy an extra set of reloading dies, have bullets in the ever so slightly larger calibre, etc.
Not quite sure what you mean by "bullets in a slightly larger caliber". The bullets are the same diameter and interchangeable. Use the same dies adjusted for .38 spl. and add a .125" washer to the press to switch to .357. Easily done. I vote for the GP100. The only downside is an erosion of the chamber if you shoot thousands of .38, making high pressure .357 had to extract.
__________________
I shoot, therefore I am.
dgang is offline  
Old August 9, 2020, 07:16 AM   #31
jetinteriorguy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 28, 2013
Posts: 3,170
Interesting, I’ve never heard of throat erosion in a revolver from shooting .38sp in a .357 mag.
jetinteriorguy is offline  
Old August 9, 2020, 10:44 AM   #32
dgang
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 14, 2000
Location: Colorado
Posts: 204
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetinteriorguy View Post
Interesting, I’ve never heard of throat erosion in a revolver from shooting .38sp in a .357 mag.
Not throat erosion, chamber erosion. Each chamber will develop a bit of erosion at the end of the .38 brass due to gases eroding the steel over a period of time.You can see this as a ring and feel it with a pick. Then when you shoot high pressure .357 the brass will flow (fire forming) into the eroded area of the chamber and cause .357 brass difficult to extract. It will take a lot of .38s to cause this due to their low pressure, but can be remedied by careful use of a mop and paste with fine grit to polish the chambers.
__________________
I shoot, therefore I am.
dgang is offline  
Old August 9, 2020, 02:12 PM   #33
Andy Blozinski
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 31, 2013
Posts: 525
It needs some trigger work to lighten it up, but I love my Chiappa Rhino with a 4" barrel. It has no muzzle climb. Strangely, it conceals quite well.
Andy Blozinski is offline  
Old August 10, 2020, 05:30 AM   #34
jetinteriorguy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 28, 2013
Posts: 3,170
Oops, sorry my bad, yes I meant chamber silly me. I’m going to have to check some of my older revolvers with higher round counts to see if any of this is happening.
jetinteriorguy is offline  
Old August 10, 2020, 10:48 AM   #35
dgang
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 14, 2000
Location: Colorado
Posts: 204
I think you will find this to be a problem in .357s if a lot of .38s have been fired. In my case the .357 brass stuck only if I was shooting maxed out loads.
__________________
I shoot, therefore I am.
dgang is offline  
Old August 11, 2020, 11:42 PM   #36
Grizzly2
Member
 
Join Date: September 5, 2017
Posts: 88
If you have very large hands look at the N frame S&W model 27. I never have owned an N frame because they just felt a bit too large for my hands. If you like how they feel then that opens up other calibers to choose from such as .41Mag, .44Special, .44Mag, .45 Colt, .45ACP and then the hotter ones.

You may not be impressed with any of the triggers on new production guns. If you go to the range where they are competing I'm sure most shooters will love to let you check out the feel of some smoothed out revolvers. I'm partial to the older 586/686 but was amazed how smooth a GP100 can be made.

If you are serious about competing and want to be competitive, now is the time to listen to those who do compete so you pick the right model the first time. Otherwise you may be handicapping yourself. Find out now if you will want 6, 7 or 8 rounds in the cylinder and why.
Grizzly2 is offline  
Old August 12, 2020, 05:15 AM   #37
jetinteriorguy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 28, 2013
Posts: 3,170
Probably the best revolver I ever owned was my S&W 627. What a sweet shooter, accurate as heck and just an all around beautiful gun. Unfortunately I accidentally double charge an already hot load of Titegroup and blew the top of the cylinder and top strap off of it. Luckily no one hurt other than a scratch on my forehead where part of it bounced off my head. I no longer use Titegroup and even after over 30 years of safe hand loading learned a lesson the hard way about being vigilant. If using a progressive loader and you have a malfunction, take all the rounds out and set them aside and deal with them later, don’t just put them back in rotation the way you think you took them out. Plus I no longer use a progressive, strictly my Lee Classic Cast turret for pistol.
jetinteriorguy is offline  
Old August 22, 2020, 12:15 PM   #38
pathdoc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 12, 2013
Posts: 669
Have done a little bit of shopping around and was able to handle a .357 Magnum revolver labelled "ALFA Stainless, Model 3551C", apparently made in the Czech Republic. Does anyone here have experience with these revolvers, specifically with regard to long-term reliability? The gun feels OK, if somewhat heavier in the hand than my S&W M&P, although this is probably a matter of attaining familiarity. Single-action trigger feels very, very nice. Double-action is passable, possibly "heavy", but I have no other recent revolver experience against which to compare.

That was all the shop had in at the time. I will try to handle a couple of other brands before committing to a sale.
pathdoc is offline  
Old August 22, 2020, 12:51 PM   #39
dgang
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 14, 2000
Location: Colorado
Posts: 204
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grizzly2 View Post
If you have very large hands look at the N frame S&W model 27. I never have owned an N frame because they just felt a bit too large for my hands. If you like how they feel then that opens up other calibers to choose from such as .41Mag, .44Special, .44Mag, .45 Colt, .45ACP and then the hotter ones.

You may not be impressed with any of the triggers on new production guns. If you go to the range where they are competing I'm sure most shooters will love to let you check out the feel of some smoothed out revolvers. I'm partial to the older 586/686 but was amazed how smooth a GP100 can be made.

If you are serious about competing and want to be competitive, now is the time to listen to those who do compete so you pick the right model the first time. Otherwise you may be handicapping yourself. Find out now if you will want 6, 7 or 8 rounds in the cylinder and why.
Bought my GP100 in 1993. After a couple of months decided the action was too hard and gritty. Using stones and files I polished the sear, the hammer strut and the inside of a the strut spring with a fine rat tail file. Smoothed the the sides of the hammer and the frame and did everything I could to polish the inside of the cylinder, extractor and crane assembly that contacts the cylinder wall. That provided a SA pull that is short and not more than a couple of pounds. Double action is smooth but still fairly heavy, moving a lot of mass when loaded. As the man said, GPs can be made very smooth.
__________________
I shoot, therefore I am.
dgang is offline  
Old August 22, 2020, 01:10 PM   #40
ammo.crafter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 25, 2006
Location: The Keystone State
Posts: 1,970
Revolver choice

Do you have the need for a .357Mag? If not, do not get it.

If you have no need for a .38Splc +P you do not need a heavy frame revolver.

Look at K frame Smiths. Good balance and action is simple to slick up.
__________________
"Peace is that brief glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading".
--Thomas Jefferson
ammo.crafter is offline  
Old August 22, 2020, 08:03 PM   #41
SIGSHR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 13, 2005
Posts: 4,700
What is the used handgun market look like up there ? A Ruger Security Six in stainless is an excellent choice.
SIGSHR is offline  
Old August 22, 2020, 09:23 PM   #42
Grizzly2
Member
 
Join Date: September 5, 2017
Posts: 88
pathdoc: Have done a little bit of shopping around and was able to handle a .357 Magnum revolver labelled "ALFA Stainless, Model 3551C", apparently made in the Czech Republic. Does anyone here have experience with these revolvers, specifically with regard to long-term reliability? The gun feels OK, if somewhat heavier in the hand than my S&W M&P, although this is probably a matter of attaining familiarity. Single-action trigger feels very, very nice. Double-action is passable, possibly "heavy", but I have no other recent revolver experience against which to compare.

That was all the shop had in at the time. I will try to handle a couple of other brands before committing to a sale."

It didn't take but one google search to confirm you don't want one of these. There have been a number of reviews. This was the only one I looked at.
https://www.gun-tests.com/handguns/r...zech-import-2/
Grizzly2 is offline  
Old August 23, 2020, 12:49 AM   #43
AustinTX
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 19, 2010
Posts: 2,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by pathdoc View Post
Have done a little bit of shopping around and was able to handle a .357 Magnum revolver labelled "ALFA Stainless, Model 3551C", apparently made in the Czech Republic. Does anyone here have experience with these revolvers, specifically with regard to long-term reliability? The gun feels OK, if somewhat heavier in the hand than my S&W M&P, although this is probably a matter of attaining familiarity. Single-action trigger feels very, very nice. Double-action is passable, possibly "heavy", but I have no other recent revolver experience against which to compare.

That was all the shop had in at the time. I will try to handle a couple of other brands before committing to a sale.
Not at all impressed with the fit and finish on the one I handled a while back. And who knows what level of customer service you can expect, should you encounter any problems.

Just be patient and wait for the right S&W or Ruger. As I said before, both companies have had their struggles with QC over the last several years, but both have reputations for excellent customer service and will generally do a great job of resolving any issues that arise.
AustinTX is offline  
Old August 23, 2020, 04:07 PM   #44
hseII
Member
 
Join Date: April 11, 2015
Posts: 34
Suggestions for a first revolver invited.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pathdoc View Post
SPECIFICATION



Intended use: Casual shooting, possibly IPSC revolver.



Restrictions: I live in Canada, so ultra-compact revolvers are off the table (minimum barrel length is at least 4 inches IIRC) and self-defence use is not a consideration. The silver lining is that I don't have to be able to wear it all day, it doesn't have to be concealable, and I can carry it holstered openly when on the range.



Considerations for calibre: I have all the necessary gear for reloading 9mm, and have considered a 9mm Parabellum revolver for commonality. I could down-load 9mm for low recoil without cycling issues, but this raises the issue of what happens if light loads meant for the revolver end up in the automatic - not dangerous, just frustrating.



The alternatives, therefore, are .357 Magnum and .38 Special. A .357 Magnum revolver suggests itself due to being able to use both types of ammunition, but can the experienced hands tell me if there is any downside at all with feeding a .357 a steady diet of .38 Special? The only downside of this is the need to buy an extra set of reloading dies, have bullets in the ever so slightly larger calibre, etc.


Ruger GP-100 4” or longer if you prefer.

It will live a boringly long & lazy life on a steady diet of .38 specials & would live forever stout .357s.

Personally in your shoes, I’d search for a Wiley Capp GP.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Last edited by hseII; August 23, 2020 at 04:16 PM.
hseII is offline  
Old August 24, 2020, 07:56 PM   #45
shoebox1.1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 24, 2006
Location: mckinney tx
Posts: 122
Colt night cobra. 6 shot. Super great trigger. Good weight. Not too light. Good sights. No snag grip. 500-600 price range before the C
shoebox1.1 is offline  
Old August 25, 2020, 06:19 AM   #46
jetinteriorguy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 28, 2013
Posts: 3,170
The OP lives in Canada so a snub is no bueno. Minimum barrel length is 4.17”.
jetinteriorguy is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.09656 seconds with 8 queries