December 30, 2015, 11:35 PM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: December 30, 2015
Posts: 8
|
1920 Springfield 1903 MKI
I recently acquired my grandpa's old 1903, and I'm trying to find out some more about it. The serial (11665XX) and barrel match up as being built in 1920, but the stock is sporterized (Bishop, very well done by the way). I think the sight is a Lyman 57, which I think is not original. It's in great condition, with a smooth, shiny bore.
He gave it to me for deer hunting, but now I'm thinking that may not be the best choice. Maybe sell it, or rebuild it? Can anyone tell me anything about this gun? Value, thoughts, suggestions, etc. |
December 31, 2015, 12:06 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 30, 2009
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 7,172
|
Edit: I forgot to mention the most important thing: It's a WWI "MK I" Springfield rifle that was constructed to use the Pedersen device, a slip-in replacement for the bolt that allowed the rifle to shoot a pistol size round semiautomatically. The empties would be ejected out of the port on the left side of the receiver. (If you were aware of this, please excuse the redundancy.)
It's been reblued, it's had the receiver drilled and tapped for the Lyman peep sight, so there's no point in trying to restore it. First off, the holes drilled for the sight would have to be filled in with weld. Next, the high gloss salts blue would have to refinished with original rust blue. Then you would have to find a correct Mk I stock, plus all the original stock hardware such as handguards, barrel bands, retainers, etc. I noticed that your bolt is a Remington replacement, so there's something else. The original barrel would have had a 1903 "sliding ladder" sight mounted on it, forward of the receiver. Assuming that there has been no turning of the barrel to modify the barrel contour, the very least would be an original 1903 sight assembly necessary. If the barrel was recontoured, then a complete barrel replacement would be necessary. To make it completely original, the Mk I trigger/action parts would probably have to be located as well. Quite frankly, if the bore is nice and shiny as you say and the headspace is good, it looks to me to be an excellent hunting rifle. Mk I receivers were nickel steel and are very strong. That will make a hunting rifle that will probably outlast you and your grandkids. Bottom line: You would spend probably close to $2000.00 to "restore" a rifle that would be worth at the most $400-500.00 because of the "restoration." Unfortunately, no collector would want it for that reason, unless they were desperate to have a "fill-in" piece for their collection.
__________________
As always, YMMV. __________________________________________ MIIAA SIFE Last edited by gyvel; December 31, 2015 at 07:44 PM. |
December 31, 2015, 03:17 AM | #3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: December 30, 2015
Posts: 8
|
Thanks Gyvel for the info. It helps point me in the right direction. I love the heritage of anything passed down. My grandpa got it in 1957, and hunted deer with it in his younger years.
I think I'll most likely move ahead with drilling and tapping for a scope, but I'm wondering, will I need to replace or rework the bolt handle to get it to clear any optic? Also, there is a small groove on the barrel just past the serial number (see pic). Is this normal from production? Thanks. |
December 31, 2015, 08:22 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 30, 2011
Location: Savannah TN
Posts: 1,217
|
gyvel is right. There are just too many modifications to that rifle to ever make the price of restoring it cost effective. In addition to having the receiver drilled and tapped for the rear sight and the original stock being long gone, it has a WWII Remington bolt instead of the original J5.
I have never seen a Mk1 stock that was separate from a rifle and if you did find one, it would probably bring serious money. The last J5 marked bolt I saw sell went for $150 and that was for a stripped bolt not a complete one. "03 rear sights complete with the base seem to sell for $60-100. This is all not to mention that it has been refinished. Most likely that Mk1 wasn't "original" when your grandfather got it anyway. After the idea of the sub caliber device was scrapped, the Mk1's went into regular service and as they went through various rebuilds, the parts unique to them were swapped out for standard '03 parts. I was lucky enough to find an original, correct Mk1 last year and I only paid eight bills for it. Some of the features unique to Mk1 rifles: Stock cut to clear the ejection port. Most Mk1's have the "WJS" cartouche. Bolt marked "J5" on the lug: Cut off and spindle are unique to Mk1: |
December 31, 2015, 11:11 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 1, 2000
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 8,511
|
That sporterized '03 is a cool piece. If it will shoot half as good as it looks, I'd definitely use it for hunting.
I have my uncle's Marlin 336 from the mid-'40s, also fitted with a receiver sight, and wouldn't hesitate to use it. Is the J5 bolt specific to the Mk. 1? I have one that's been completely converted to normal '03 specs but for the ejection port, and though the barrel and receiver appear to be parkerized, the bolt is blued, the headspace isn't as good as it should be, and I've wondered if it's not the original bolt.
__________________
Runs off at the mouth about anything 1911 related on this site and half the time is flat out wrong. |
December 31, 2015, 11:38 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 23, 2009
Posts: 3,963
|
Keep it, you've got the best deer rifle made.
Also a good target rifle. Put a good Leupold scope on it, you're golden. |
December 31, 2015, 12:46 PM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 30, 2011
Location: Savannah TN
Posts: 1,217
|
Quote:
Other heat lot coded bolts used during the same time period were "L2, L5, L9" (where the "L" looks like an upside down 7) and J6. So actually I misspoke when I said it had to be a J5 bolt to be correct. Nevertheless, the OP's rifle has a WWII Remington bolt which, while not "correct" will work just fine. |
|
December 31, 2015, 07:46 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 30, 2009
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 7,172
|
Quote:
__________________
As always, YMMV. __________________________________________ MIIAA SIFE |
|
January 1, 2016, 01:38 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 23, 2000
Location: England
Posts: 455
|
So it's a service barrel that's been turned down to lighten it, which explains the rather 'as issued' front sight, which most sportsmen would have replaced with something better.
|
January 1, 2016, 02:44 PM | #10 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
Hi, gyvel and folks,
That hole is for the sight fixed base spline pin, and I have never been able to figure out its purpose. It was drilled at the joint of the barrel and fixed base after the fixed base had already been installed and secured by the securing pin at its lower front. So the spline pin seems to have no purpose except perhaps to double insure against movement of the fixed base during barrel installation. Jim |
January 1, 2016, 03:05 PM | #11 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
OK, I now understand; the little bulb came on!
I went by the operation numbers at Springfield, and Operation 41 is installing the securing pin, while Operation 44 is drilling the spline pin hole. But I didn't read the route sheet, which says Operation 44 comes before Operation 41, so the spline pin is installed first and keeps the fixed base from turning while the securing pin hole is drilled. That makes sense because drilling a hole in a rounded surface will try to torque the work. Jim |
January 1, 2016, 07:39 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 14, 2004
Location: NY State
Posts: 6,575
|
Yours, like mine ,makes a great hunter.Suitable for anything in NA. Shoot and enjoy it !!
__________________
And Watson , bring your revolver ! |
January 2, 2016, 03:28 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 7,839
|
it should make an excellent hunting rifle unless you hunt open fields and prairie. Lyman sights are good and there is a reason so many people ripped off the factory sights and replaced them with lymans that cost as much as the gun did. I don't believe it would be worth restoring. the receiver had to be drilled and tapped for the sights so it would never get any of its value back and the cost of the stock in addition to all the small parts(bayonet lug, stock rings, sling swivels ETC) would be more than the total value of the gun when you were done. just keep it as is, a pretty sporter.
a friend had a MK1 that was drilled and tapped for 3 different scope mounts and was a terrible bubba sporter job. I restored it into a poorly done reproduction 1903A4 with modern glass. still has the same value it did before but it certainly has a little more flair than it did. before After, alongside my 1903A4 rebuild project.
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar. I never said half the stuff people said I did-Albert Einstein You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin |
January 2, 2016, 11:33 AM | #14 |
Junior Member
Join Date: December 30, 2015
Posts: 8
|
Thanks for all the info and feedback. It's great to learn more about the details of this rifle.
Is there a certain scope mount that you would recommend? I'm planning on removing and selling the Lyman sight and adding a scope. I've been looking at an S&K no-drill mount ( http://www.thecountryshed.com/s&k_scope_mounts.htm ), but it looks like I would have to slightly alter the stock and I'm a complete newby to this. Thanks for any advice you can offer! |
January 2, 2016, 11:50 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 23, 2009
Posts: 3,963
|
Just take it to a smith and have a good mount drilled and tapped in, you will end up doing that anyway. Your rifle kinda cries out for a Leupold VX1 scope, they run about $200. You won't be sorry you spent the money on a good mount and glass, cheap is not inexpensive when you have to buy something two or three times.
|
January 2, 2016, 09:18 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 10, 1999
Location: High Desert NV
Posts: 2,850
|
Have you shot it? You might be surprised at how well it shoots even with the iron sights.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|