|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 24, 2018, 11:46 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: January 8, 2018
Posts: 28
|
Rear sight for leading airplanes - info
This is a rear sight for leading airplanes. Can anyone provide any information on this?
|
January 24, 2018, 01:06 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 27, 2008
Posts: 555
|
Leading them where?
Good story (if you can fill it out a bit) though. Hope you didn't buy it, the story that is, on a rifle. That looks to be a receiver sight. Maker's name should be on it. These sights were very popular in the days before standard rifle scope use and higher quality versions are still used for target shooting (as in the Olympics). IFAIK, receiver sights like the one you have pictured were never standard issue on U.S. combat rifles. JT Last edited by JT-AR-MG42; January 24, 2018 at 01:12 PM. |
January 24, 2018, 03:47 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 12,453
|
That sight has nothing to do with aircraft. It's a target sight that goes on the receiver like JT-AR-MG42 says. Exactly what receiver is unknown. Might be a .22. Might be an '03A3.
__________________
Spelling and grammar count! |
January 24, 2018, 04:01 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,539
|
Looks like a Lyman No 48 target peep sight. Dead common in its day. Base shape looks like Springfield.
Strangely enough, there was a Lyman sight made for anti-aircraft training with the 1922 .22 rifle. It was the regular No 48 base and elevation slide, but instead of a peep sight aperture, it had an open notch. Very scarce, I have only seen a few pictures, none in person. |
January 24, 2018, 09:28 PM | #5 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
Jim Watson is correct, but the idea soon went away when it became obvious that shooting at airplanes with rifles would not be very production, although some countries (e.g., Japan) continued to issue rifle sights with "wings" that could be opened outward for firing at aircraft. It was probably done more to let the troops feel that hey were doing something to fight off the seemingly invincible airplane than to provide a realistic defense against aerial attack.
Jim |
January 25, 2018, 09:42 AM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: January 8, 2018
Posts: 28
|
Wow, how embarassing. I remember Dad showing me a wings out sight on a rifle for aircraft purposes so I've been looking for it. I found the side mount peep sight and thought that was it. Dad did part with a Japanese sniper rifle years back - maybe that was it.
|
January 25, 2018, 12:21 PM | #7 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,383
|
The rifle your Dad showed you was very likely a Japanese Type 99 Arisaka, which had fold-out anti-aircraft wings.
Good video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2EkEsvwARE
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
January 25, 2018, 01:16 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 28, 2014
Posts: 442
|
Well, we all make a blunder once in awhile, yours just came sooner then expected. welcome to the forum.
__________________
The 6 gun was once as common as the cellphone is today, and just as annoying when it went off in the theater. |
January 25, 2018, 03:43 PM | #9 | |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,820
|
Quote:
The best tactic was for the entire unit (platoon, company, etc.) to volley fire at the aircraft. Ground attack aircraft, especially in the Pacific often flew within rifle range in order to spot their targets. Was it as good as MGs and AA guns? no. On the other hand, all it cost was a few rounds of ammo, and troops were shooting back, and once in a while though rare it did work.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
|
January 25, 2018, 06:57 PM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: January 8, 2018
Posts: 28
|
Of some consolation, maybe Dad didn't part ways with the Japanese sniper rifle - I found his bayonet that would fit the Ariska 99.
|
January 26, 2018, 01:33 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 29, 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 6,126
|
cessna123 You'll want to take some light oil and 0000steel wool to that bayonet.
I heard a story about a p-51 pilot saying he was shot down by a single rifle shot by a German soldier while doing ground cover in Holland. At a different gather describing the same battle an American soldier said he had shot down a Messerschmidt with a single shot from his rifle. |
January 26, 2018, 06:39 AM | #12 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,383
|
A friend of mine was a Cobra pilot in Gulf War I.
He was shot down by an Iraqi with an AK-47. One bullet managed to find that magical entry point and damaged and damaged an oil line, causing the engine to overheat. They had to sit down about 40 miles short of their base.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
January 27, 2018, 09:41 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 2, 2011
Location: West Coast of Michigan
Posts: 132
|
"Leading" sight are built into rifles currently, the standard M16 rifle is set up that way. Those protective ears around the front sight post that seem flared out, are actually used as a leading sight for enemy troops. Running either left or right, use the opposite ear as your front sight post.
|
January 28, 2018, 12:22 AM | #14 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
New one on me. While that could have been done, or maybe even was, I am pretty sure the sight guards were put there to protect the sight blade from damage, not as an aiming point for a running enemy soldier.
FWIW, the early M1 rifle, of WWII fame, originally had front sight guards that were almost straight. Then it was found that too many soldiers were mistaking one or the other guard for the front sight blade, so the guards on both the M1 rifle and M1 carbine were given a greater outward bend. Jim |
January 28, 2018, 08:12 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 2, 2011
Location: West Coast of Michigan
Posts: 132
|
It's covered under the section of "advanced shooting skills" in the marksmanship field manual------ believe it or not
|
|
|