The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: Semi-automatics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old July 14, 2021, 11:42 PM   #1
Joe_Pike
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 30, 2010
Posts: 1,581
Ruger 10/22 Stock Recommendation

I have the basic carbine Ruger 10/22 with a wood stock. I was going to switch to a Magpul X-22 but I have read some reports that the forend is a bit flimsy. So, I'm looking for some other recommendations for something stiff, reasonably light and comfortable that doesn't break the bank.
__________________
Stay Groovy
Joe_Pike is offline  
Old July 15, 2021, 03:06 AM   #2
ballardw
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 19, 2008
Posts: 1,411
You may get more targeted responses if describe the intended purpose and/or features you want.

A basic field stock could be quite different from one intended for one of the action shooting competitions or something "tacticool" such as making the rifle look more like an M1 Carbine.
__________________
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
All data is flawed, some just less so.
ballardw is offline  
Old July 15, 2021, 04:30 AM   #3
eflyguy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 1, 2021
Posts: 335
Agreed. Without knowing intention, hard to say.

We compete in an offhand, 3-position match and have the Promag Archangel. The quick adjustments make it trivial to reconfigure between rounds. It's not lightweight, by design.
eflyguy is offline  
Old July 15, 2021, 09:06 AM   #4
Joe_Pike
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 30, 2010
Posts: 1,581
I thought mentioning the Magpul X-22 would give people an idea if what I was looking for.
__________________
Stay Groovy
Joe_Pike is offline  
Old July 15, 2021, 01:13 PM   #5
ChasHam
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 27, 2018
Location: Deep South
Posts: 130
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe_Pike View Post
I thought mentioning the Magpul X-22 would give people an idea if what I was looking for.
It would appear not ;-)
ChasHam is offline  
Old July 15, 2021, 03:25 PM   #6
Scorch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,248
I have the Magpul Hunter X22 stock. I picked it up because I do a lot of 10/22 accurizing work so I can test how well the rifles are shooting after the work. I am not absolutely in love with the Magpul, but it's a pretty good stock. Inletting is clean and the adjustable comb and LOP feature is nice.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs.
But what do I know?
Summit Arms Services
Scorch is offline  
Old July 15, 2021, 03:33 PM   #7
Joe_Pike
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 30, 2010
Posts: 1,581
Scorch, let me ask you this. I have read where some say that the forend is a bit flimsy and will be up against the barrel if you set it on a rest or use a bipod. Is this correct? I really like the looks of the stock and would think it would fit my needs but I don't want the barrel in contact with the forend while it is on a rest.
__________________
Stay Groovy

Last edited by Joe_Pike; July 15, 2021 at 04:22 PM.
Joe_Pike is offline  
Old July 15, 2021, 04:30 PM   #8
ms6852
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 3, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,394
Are keeping the same barrel? EABCO.NET has a stock that is a replica of the m1. If you plan to change barrel there are chassis that will accommodate the .920 barrels.
__________________
ONLY TWO DEFINING FORCES HAVE GIVEN UP THEIR LIVES FOR YOU. ONE IS JESUS CHRIST FOR YOUR SOUL AND THE OTHER IS THE AMERICAN SOLDIER FOR YOUR FREEDOM.
ms6852 is offline  
Old July 15, 2021, 04:53 PM   #9
Joe_Pike
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 30, 2010
Posts: 1,581
Quote:
Are keeping the same barrel?
Yep. Just wanting to tinker a little bit. Don't have the money to go too overboard.
__________________
Stay Groovy
Joe_Pike is offline  
Old July 15, 2021, 11:31 PM   #10
Scorch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,248
Quote:
I have read where some say that the forend is a bit flimsy and will be up against the barrel if you set it on a rest or use a bipod.
Never had that problem, and I've used the stock a bit on the bench. The Magpul forearm is plenty sturdy, especially when you take the barrel channel liner and turn it so the big side is up. This gives you plenty of clearance between pretty much any barrel shy of .950" and the stock. And the barrel channel liner acts as a forearm stiffener as well.

As far as what the stock does when putting it on a bipod, I don't do that so I don't know, but it does just fine sitting on sandbags.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs.
But what do I know?
Summit Arms Services
Scorch is offline  
Old July 15, 2021, 11:53 PM   #11
Joe_Pike
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 30, 2010
Posts: 1,581
Thanks. Scorch.
__________________
Stay Groovy
Joe_Pike is offline  
Old July 18, 2021, 12:18 PM   #12
bbqncigars
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 1, 2009
Location: Iowa
Posts: 525
I've been extremely happy with the B&C stock on my gun. It is comfortable, accurate and danged light. It is, however, not cheap or tacticool.
__________________
"Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most." A. Brilliant
bbqncigars is offline  
Old July 18, 2021, 02:37 PM   #13
Joe_Pike
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 30, 2010
Posts: 1,581
I have no interest in tacticool. Mostly light and not terribly expensive. The more I read and learn about the 10/22, I'm finding out that a free float barrel isn't really a good thing for this particular rifle due to its design. I guess I'll just leave the stock alone for now and just install the Volquartsen target hammer and auto bolt release and go have some fun plinking.
__________________
Stay Groovy
Joe_Pike is offline  
Old July 19, 2021, 06:19 AM   #14
Spats McGee
Staff
 
Join Date: July 28, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 8,821
FWIW, I have a Hogue stock on mine. I just recently put it on and only have a couple of hundred rounds through it. That said, I'm really enjoying it.
__________________
I'm a lawyer, but I'm not your lawyer. If you need some honest-to-goodness legal advice, go buy some.
Spats McGee is offline  
Old July 19, 2021, 06:31 AM   #15
jmr40
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,809
I can't stand the shape or short LOP on the common standard 10/22 carbine. If at all possible I prefer to buy one of the sporter versions offered by Ruger. They don't cost significantly more than the standard carbine but you'll probably have to order one.

https://ruger.com/products/1022Sporter/models.html

If going with an aftermarket stock I find the Hogue to be hard to beat. I don't like Hogue stocks on centerfire rifles or shotguns, but the 10/22 version isn't bad at all.

IMO the Magpul is just too heavy and clunky, especially mated to the short, skinny carbine barrel. If used with one of the longer heavy target barrels maybe.
__________________
"If you're still doing things the same way you were doing them 10 years ago, you're doing it wrong"

Winston Churchill
jmr40 is offline  
Old July 20, 2021, 02:56 PM   #16
Shane Tuttle
Staff
 
Join Date: November 28, 2005
Location: Montana
Posts: 9,443
I've been really happy with Boyd's for my Marlin 795. They have oodles of choices for 10/22s at reasonable prices.
__________________
If it were up to me, the word "got" would be deleted from the English language.

Posting and YOU: http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/posting
Shane Tuttle is offline  
Old July 20, 2021, 04:13 PM   #17
Onward Allusion
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 17, 2009
Location: Back in a Non-Free State
Posts: 3,133
I'd dropped one of mine into a Ruger Charger poly stock and got the adapter for a standard 6 position buttstock & tube. Haven't weighed it on a scale but it's light.

Another option is the Blackhawk Axiom with a cheek riser. That one is even lighter.
__________________
Simple as ABC . . . Always Be Carrying
Onward Allusion is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.12869 seconds with 8 queries